From: Niklas Cassel <cassel@kernel.org>
To: Koichiro Den <den@valinux.co.jp>
Cc: mani@kernel.org, kwilczynski@kernel.org, kishon@kernel.org,
bhelgaas@google.com, jdmason@kudzu.us, dave.jiang@intel.com,
allenbh@gmail.com, Frank.Li@nxp.com, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ntb@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] PCI: endpoint: pci-epf-vntb: Fix MSI doorbell IRQ unwind
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2026 12:56:18 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aZMF4hsBT-v3fPIW@ryzen> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260215150914.3392479-2-den@valinux.co.jp>
On Mon, Feb 16, 2026 at 12:09:11AM +0900, Koichiro Den wrote:
> epf_ntb_db_bar_init_msi_doorbell() requests ntb->db_count doorbell IRQs
> and then performs additional MSI doorbell setup that may still fail.
> The error path unwinds the requested IRQs, but it uses a loop variable
> that is reused later in the function. When a later step fails, the
> unwind can run with an unexpected index value and leave some IRQs
> requested.
>
> Track the number of successfully requested IRQs separately and use that
> counter for the unwind so all previously requested IRQs are freed on
> failure.
>
> Fixes: dc693d606644 ("PCI: endpoint: pci-epf-vntb: Add MSI doorbell support")
> Signed-off-by: Koichiro Den <den@valinux.co.jp>
> ---
> drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-vntb.c | 11 ++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-vntb.c b/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-vntb.c
> index 20a400e83439..20efa27325f1 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-vntb.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-vntb.c
> @@ -523,6 +523,7 @@ static int epf_ntb_db_bar_init_msi_doorbell(struct epf_ntb *ntb,
> enum pci_barno barno)
> {
> struct pci_epf *epf = ntb->epf;
> + unsigned int req;
> dma_addr_t low, high;
> struct msi_msg *msg;
> size_t sz;
> @@ -533,14 +534,14 @@ static int epf_ntb_db_bar_init_msi_doorbell(struct epf_ntb *ntb,
> if (ret)
> return ret;
>
> - for (i = 0; i < ntb->db_count; i++) {
> - ret = request_irq(epf->db_msg[i].virq, epf_ntb_doorbell_handler,
> + for (req = 0; req < ntb->db_count; req++) {
> + ret = request_irq(epf->db_msg[req].virq, epf_ntb_doorbell_handler,
> 0, "pci_epf_vntb_db", ntb);
>
> if (ret) {
> dev_err(&epf->dev,
> "Failed to request doorbell IRQ: %d\n",
> - epf->db_msg[i].virq);
> + epf->db_msg[req].virq);
> goto err_free_irq;
> }
> }
> @@ -598,8 +599,8 @@ static int epf_ntb_db_bar_init_msi_doorbell(struct epf_ntb *ntb,
> return 0;
>
> err_free_irq:
> - for (i--; i >= 0; i--)
> - free_irq(epf->db_msg[i].virq, ntb);
> + while (req)
> + free_irq(epf->db_msg[--req].virq, ntb);
Please keep the for-loop.
Or if you want to change it, do so in a separate patch.
I understand that you need a separate variable for this,
since "i" is (re-)used in other places in the function,
but changing the for loop to a while is distracting from
the actual fix.
Kind regards,
Niklas
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-02-16 11:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-02-15 15:09 [PATCH 0/4] PCI: endpoint: Doorbell-related fixes Koichiro Den
2026-02-15 15:09 ` [PATCH 1/4] PCI: endpoint: pci-epf-vntb: Fix MSI doorbell IRQ unwind Koichiro Den
2026-02-16 11:56 ` Niklas Cassel [this message]
2026-02-16 14:02 ` Koichiro Den
2026-02-16 14:08 ` Niklas Cassel
2026-02-15 15:09 ` [PATCH 2/4] PCI: endpoint: pci-epf-test: Sanity-check doorbell offset within BAR Koichiro Den
2026-02-16 13:14 ` Niklas Cassel
2026-02-16 14:17 ` Koichiro Den
2026-02-15 15:09 ` [PATCH 3/4] PCI: endpoint: pci-epf-test: Don't free doorbell IRQ unless requested Koichiro Den
2026-02-16 11:35 ` Niklas Cassel
2026-02-16 14:30 ` Koichiro Den
2026-02-17 2:49 ` Koichiro Den
2026-02-15 15:09 ` [PATCH 4/4] PCI: endpoint: pci-ep-msi: Fix error unwind and prevent double alloc Koichiro Den
2026-02-16 11:57 ` Niklas Cassel
2026-02-16 11:51 ` [PATCH 0/4] PCI: endpoint: Doorbell-related fixes Niklas Cassel
2026-02-16 13:48 ` Koichiro Den
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aZMF4hsBT-v3fPIW@ryzen \
--to=cassel@kernel.org \
--cc=Frank.Li@nxp.com \
--cc=allenbh@gmail.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=dave.jiang@intel.com \
--cc=den@valinux.co.jp \
--cc=jdmason@kudzu.us \
--cc=kishon@kernel.org \
--cc=kwilczynski@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mani@kernel.org \
--cc=ntb@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox