From: Farhan Ali <alifm@linux.ibm.com>
To: Benjamin Block <bblock@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
alex.williamson@redhat.com, helgaas@kernel.org, clg@redhat.com,
schnelle@linux.ibm.com, mjrosato@linux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 01/10] PCI: Avoid saving error values for config space
Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2025 10:12:03 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ae5b191d-ffc6-4d40-a44b-d08e04cac6be@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251001151543.GB408411@p1gen4-pw042f0m>
On 10/1/2025 8:15 AM, Benjamin Block wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 24, 2025 at 10:16:19AM -0700, Farhan Ali wrote:
>> @@ -1792,6 +1798,14 @@ static void pci_restore_pcix_state(struct pci_dev *dev)
>> int pci_save_state(struct pci_dev *dev)
>> {
>> int i;
>> + u32 val;
>> +
>> + pci_read_config_dword(dev, PCI_COMMAND, &val);
>> + if (PCI_POSSIBLE_ERROR(val)) {
>> + pci_warn(dev, "Device config space inaccessible, will only be partially restored\n");
>> + return -EIO;
> Should it set `dev->state_saved` to `false`, to be on the save side?
> Not sure whether we run a risk of restoring an old, outdated state otherwise.
AFAIU if the state_saved flag was set to true then any state that we
have saved should be valid and should be okay to be restored from. We
just want to avoid saving any invalid data.
>
>> + }
>> +
>> /* XXX: 100% dword access ok here? */
>> for (i = 0; i < 16; i++) {
>> pci_read_config_dword(dev, i * 4, &dev->saved_config_space[i]);
>> @@ -1854,6 +1868,14 @@ static void pci_restore_config_space_range(struct pci_dev *pdev,
>>
>> static void pci_restore_config_space(struct pci_dev *pdev)
>> {
>> + if (!pdev->state_saved) {
>> + pci_warn(pdev, "No saved config space, restoring BARs\n");
>> + pci_restore_bars(pdev);
>> + pci_write_config_word(pdev, PCI_COMMAND,
>> + PCI_COMMAND_MEMORY | PCI_COMMAND_IO);
> Is this really something that ought to be universally enabled? I thought this
> depends on whether attached resources are IO and/or MEM?
>
> int pci_enable_resources(struct pci_dev *dev, int mask)
> {
> ...
> pci_dev_for_each_resource(dev, r, i) {
> ...
> if (r->flags & IORESOURCE_IO)
> cmd |= PCI_COMMAND_IO;
> if (r->flags & IORESOURCE_MEM)
> cmd |= PCI_COMMAND_MEMORY;
> }
> ...
> }
>
> Also IIRC, especially on s390, we never have IO resources?
>
> int zpci_setup_bus_resources(struct zpci_dev *zdev)
> {
> ...
> for (i = 0; i < PCI_STD_NUM_BARS; i++) {
> ...
> /* only MMIO is supported */
> flags = IORESOURCE_MEM;
> if (zdev->bars[i].val & 8)
> flags |= IORESOURCE_PREFETCH;
> if (zdev->bars[i].val & 4)
> flags |= IORESOURCE_MEM_64;
> ...
> }
> ...
> }
>
> So I guess this would have to have some form of the same logic as in
> `pci_enable_resources()`, after restoring the BARs.
>
> Or am I missing something?
As per my understanding of the spec, setting both I/O Space and Memory
Space should be safe. The spec also mentions if a function doesn't
support IO/Memory space access it could hardwire the bit to zero. We
could add the logic to iterate through all the resources and set the
bits accordingly, but in this case trying a best effort restoration it
should be fine?
Also I didn't see any issues testing on s390x with the NVMe, RoCE and
NETD devices, but I could have missed something.
Thanks
Farhan
>
>> + return;
>> + }
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-01 17:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-24 17:16 [PATCH v4 00/10] Error recovery for vfio-pci devices on s390x Farhan Ali
2025-09-24 17:16 ` [PATCH v4 01/10] PCI: Avoid saving error values for config space Farhan Ali
2025-10-01 15:15 ` Benjamin Block
2025-10-01 17:12 ` Farhan Ali [this message]
2025-10-02 9:16 ` Benjamin Block
2025-10-04 14:54 ` Lukas Wunner
2025-10-06 17:54 ` Farhan Ali
2025-10-06 19:26 ` Lukas Wunner
2025-10-06 21:35 ` Farhan Ali
2025-10-08 13:34 ` Lukas Wunner
2025-10-08 17:56 ` Farhan Ali
2025-10-08 18:14 ` Lukas Wunner
2025-10-08 21:55 ` Farhan Ali
2025-10-09 4:52 ` Lukas Wunner
2025-10-09 17:02 ` Farhan Ali
2025-10-12 6:43 ` Lukas Wunner
2025-10-09 9:12 ` Niklas Schnelle
2025-10-12 6:34 ` Lukas Wunner
2025-10-14 12:07 ` Niklas Schnelle
2025-10-16 21:00 ` Farhan Ali
2025-10-19 14:34 ` Lukas Wunner
2025-10-20 8:59 ` Niklas Schnelle
2025-11-22 10:58 ` Lukas Wunner
2025-09-24 17:16 ` [PATCH v4 02/10] PCI: Add additional checks for flr reset Farhan Ali
2025-09-30 10:03 ` Benjamin Block
2025-09-30 17:04 ` Farhan Ali
2025-10-01 8:33 ` Benjamin Block
2025-10-01 14:37 ` Benjamin Block
2025-09-24 17:16 ` [PATCH v4 03/10] PCI: Allow per function PCI slots Farhan Ali
2025-10-01 14:34 ` Benjamin Block
2025-09-24 17:16 ` [PATCH v4 04/10] s390/pci: Add architecture specific resource/bus address translation Farhan Ali
2025-09-25 10:54 ` Niklas Schnelle
2025-10-01 16:04 ` Benjamin Block
2025-10-01 18:01 ` Farhan Ali
2025-10-02 12:58 ` Niklas Schnelle
2025-10-02 17:00 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-10-02 17:16 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2025-10-02 18:14 ` Niklas Schnelle
2025-09-24 17:16 ` [PATCH v4 05/10] s390/pci: Restore IRQ unconditionally for the zPCI device Farhan Ali
2025-09-24 17:16 ` [PATCH v4 06/10] s390/pci: Update the logic for detecting passthrough device Farhan Ali
2025-09-24 17:16 ` [PATCH v4 07/10] s390/pci: Store PCI error information for passthrough devices Farhan Ali
2025-09-25 14:28 ` Niklas Schnelle
2025-09-25 16:29 ` Farhan Ali
2025-09-24 17:16 ` [PATCH v4 08/10] vfio-pci/zdev: Add a device feature for error information Farhan Ali
2025-09-25 8:04 ` kernel test robot
2025-09-24 17:16 ` [PATCH v4 09/10] vfio: Add a reset_done callback for vfio-pci driver Farhan Ali
2025-09-24 17:16 ` [PATCH v4 10/10] vfio: Remove the pcie check for VFIO_PCI_ERR_IRQ_INDEX Farhan Ali
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ae5b191d-ffc6-4d40-a44b-d08e04cac6be@linux.ibm.com \
--to=alifm@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=bblock@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=clg@redhat.com \
--cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mjrosato@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=schnelle@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).