linux-pci.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Baolu Lu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
To: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>,
	robin.murphy@arm.com, joro@8bytes.org, bhelgaas@google.com,
	jgg@nvidia.com
Cc: will@kernel.org, robin.clark@oss.qualcomm.com,
	yong.wu@mediatek.com, matthias.bgg@gmail.com,
	angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com,
	thierry.reding@gmail.com, vdumpa@nvidia.com,
	jonathanh@nvidia.com, rafael@kernel.org, lenb@kernel.org,
	kevin.tian@intel.com, yi.l.liu@intel.com,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, iommu@lists.linux.dev,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
	patches@lists.linux.dev, pjaroszynski@nvidia.com,
	vsethi@nvidia.com, helgaas@kernel.org, etzhao1900@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/5] iommu: Add iommu_get_domain_for_dev_locked() helper
Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2025 13:28:02 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aeb04f91-ffce-4092-8dbc-17d116cd7c7e@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a69557026b7e2353bae67104bbe6a88f0682305e.1754952762.git.nicolinc@nvidia.com>

On 8/12/25 06:59, Nicolin Chen wrote:
> There is a need to attach a PCI device that's under a reset to temporally
> the blocked domain (i.e. detach it from its previously attached domain),
> and then to reattach it back to its previous domain (i.e. detach it from
> the blocked domain) after reset.
> 
> During the reset stage, there can be races from other attach/detachment.
> To solve this, a per-gdev reset flag will be introduced so that all the
> attach functions will bypass the driver-level attach_dev callbacks, but
> only update the group->domain pointer. The reset recovery procedure will
> attach directly to the cached pointer so things will be back to normal.
> 
> On the other hand, the iommu_get_domain_for_dev() API always returns the
> group->domain pointer, and several IOMMMU drivers call this API in their
> attach_dev callback functions to get the currently attached domain for a
> device, which will be broken for the recovery case mentioned above:
>   1. core asks the driver to attach dev from blocked to group->domain
>   2. driver attaches dev from group->domain to group->domain
> 
> So, iommu_get_domain_for_dev() should check the gdev flag and return the
> blocked domain if the flag is set. But the caller of this API could hold
> the group->mutex already or not, making it difficult to add the lock.
> 
> Introduce a new iommu_get_domain_for_dev_locked() helper to be used by
> those drivers in a context that is already under the protection of the
> group->mutex, e.g. those attach_dev callback functions. And roll out the
> new helper to all the existing IOMMU drivers.

Given that iommu_group->mutex is transparent to the iommu driver, how
about

/*
  * Called only by iommu drivers in the callback context where
  * group->mutex has already been held by the core.
  */
struct iommu_domain *iommu_get_domain_for_dev_internal(struct device *dev)
{
	...
	lockdep_assert_held(&group->mutex);
	...
}

?

> 
> Add a lockdep_assert_not_held to the existing iommu_get_domain_for_dev()
> to note that it would be only used outside the group->mutex.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Nicolin Chen<nicolinc@nvidia.com>

Thanks,
baolu

  reply	other threads:[~2025-08-15  5:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 55+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-08-11 22:59 [PATCH v3 0/5] Disable ATS via iommu during PCI resets Nicolin Chen
2025-08-11 22:59 ` [PATCH v3 1/5] iommu: Lock group->mutex in iommu_deferred_attach Nicolin Chen
2025-08-15  5:09   ` Baolu Lu
2025-08-15  8:27     ` Tian, Kevin
2025-08-15  8:24   ` Tian, Kevin
2025-08-15 19:26     ` Nicolin Chen
2025-08-18 14:17     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-08-18 17:45       ` Nicolin Chen
2025-08-18 18:09         ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-08-18 18:29           ` Nicolin Chen
2025-08-11 22:59 ` [PATCH v3 2/5] iommu: Pass in gdev to __iommu_device_set_domain Nicolin Chen
2025-08-15  5:18   ` Baolu Lu
2025-08-15  8:29   ` Tian, Kevin
2025-08-11 22:59 ` [PATCH v3 3/5] iommu: Add iommu_get_domain_for_dev_locked() helper Nicolin Chen
2025-08-15  5:28   ` Baolu Lu [this message]
2025-08-15 18:48     ` Nicolin Chen
2025-08-18 14:40     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-08-19  2:09       ` Baolu Lu
2025-08-15  8:55   ` Tian, Kevin
2025-08-15 18:45     ` Nicolin Chen
2025-08-21  8:07       ` Tian, Kevin
2025-08-21 14:41         ` Nicolin Chen
2025-08-31 23:24           ` Nicolin Chen
2025-08-18 14:39   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-08-18 17:22     ` Nicolin Chen
2025-08-18 23:42       ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-08-19  5:09         ` Nicolin Chen
2025-08-19 12:52           ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-08-19 17:22             ` Nicolin Chen
2025-08-21 13:13               ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-08-21 15:22                 ` Nicolin Chen
2025-08-21 18:37                   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-08-22  5:11                     ` Nicolin Chen
2025-08-21  8:11       ` Tian, Kevin
2025-08-21 13:14         ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-08-22  9:45           ` Tian, Kevin
2025-08-22 13:21             ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-08-11 22:59 ` [PATCH v3 4/5] iommu: Introduce iommu_dev_reset_prepare() and iommu_dev_reset_done() Nicolin Chen
2025-08-15  5:49   ` Baolu Lu
2025-08-15 20:10     ` Nicolin Chen
2025-08-15  9:14   ` Tian, Kevin
2025-08-15 19:45     ` Nicolin Chen
2025-08-11 22:59 ` [PATCH v3 5/5] pci: Suspend iommu function prior to resetting a device Nicolin Chen
2025-08-19 14:12   ` Ethan Zhao
2025-08-19 21:59     ` Nicolin Chen
2025-08-20  3:18       ` Ethan Zhao
2025-08-22  6:14         ` Nicolin Chen
2025-08-21 13:07       ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-08-22  6:35         ` Nicolin Chen
2025-08-22 14:08           ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-08-22 18:50             ` Nicolin Chen
2025-08-28 12:51               ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-08-28 15:08                 ` Nicolin Chen
2025-08-28 18:46                   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-08-28 19:35                     ` Nicolin Chen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aeb04f91-ffce-4092-8dbc-17d116cd7c7e@linux.intel.com \
    --to=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=etzhao1900@gmail.com \
    --cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
    --cc=jonathanh@nvidia.com \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
    --cc=lenb@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
    --cc=nicolinc@nvidia.com \
    --cc=patches@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=pjaroszynski@nvidia.com \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=robin.clark@oss.qualcomm.com \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
    --cc=vdumpa@nvidia.com \
    --cc=vsethi@nvidia.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=yi.l.liu@intel.com \
    --cc=yong.wu@mediatek.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).