Linux PCI subsystem development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	x86@kernel.org, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>,
	Benedikt Spranger <b.spranger@linutronix.de>,
	Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>
Subject: Re: x86/PCI: Scan all functions during probing
Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2016 10:39:11 +0200 (CEST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1608241037510.5714@nanos> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160818203348.GK27353@localhost>

On Thu, 18 Aug 2016, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> I looked up the spec: PCI (not PCIe) r3.0, sec 3.2.2.3.4, says:
> 
>   A single-function device may optionally respond to all function
>   numbers as the same function or may ... respond only to function 0
>   and not respond to the other function numbers.
> 
> I'm concerned that a single-function device that responds to all
> function numbers might break with this patch.
> 
>   [multi-function devices] are also required to always implement
>   function 0 in the device.
> 
> Here's the reason we can advance by 8 in the "Go find them" loop.
> 
>   If a single function device is detected (i.e., bit 7 in the Header
>   Type register of function 0 is 0), no more functions for that Device
>   Number will be checked.  If a multi-function device is detected
>   (i.e., bit 7 in the Header Type register of function 0 is 1), then
>   all remaining Function Numbers will be checked.
> 
> This patch does the opposite of what the first sentence recommends.

Fair enough. We'll need to find a way to deal with that in jailhouse then.

Thanks,

	tglx

  reply	other threads:[~2016-08-24  8:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-08-09 11:22 x86/PCI: Scan all functions during probing Thomas Gleixner
2016-08-09 12:13 ` Lukas Wunner
2016-08-09 13:44 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-08-18 20:33   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-08-24  8:39     ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2016-08-24 11:13       ` Jan Kiszka
2016-08-24 17:23         ` Thomas Gleixner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.2.20.1608241037510.5714@nanos \
    --to=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=b.spranger@linutronix.de \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
    --cc=jan.kiszka@siemens.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lukas@wunner.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox