From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 11/27] x86, irq: Add realloc_irq_and_cfg_at()
Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2013 22:13:44 +0200 (CEST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.02.1306102144300.22970@ionos> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1370644273-10495-12-git-send-email-yinghai@kernel.org>
On Fri, 7 Jun 2013, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> For ioapic hot-add support, it would be easy if we put all irqs
> for that ioapic controller together.
>
> We can reserve irq range at first, then reallocate those
No. We do not reallocate something which does not exist in the first
place.
> pre-reserved one when it is needed.
>
> Add realloc_irq_and_cfg_at() to really allocate irq_desc and cfg,
> because pre-reserved only mark bits in allocate_irqs bit maps.
>
> The reasons for not allocating them during reserving:
> 1. only several pins in ioapic are used, allocate for all pins, will
> waste memory for not used pins.
> 2. relocate later could make sure irq_desc is allocated on local node ram.
> as dev->node is set at that point.
This is not relocating. Your changelog sucks as much as your code.
> -v2: update changelog by adding reasons, requested by Konrad.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
> Cc: Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>
> Cc: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
> Cc: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc>
> ---
> arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c | 32 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> include/linux/irq.h | 5 +++++
> kernel/irq/irqdesc.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
No, we do not add new code to the core and use it in the same patch at
some random other place. The core code change wants to be separate and
have a separate changelog.
> --- a/include/linux/irq.h
> +++ b/include/linux/irq.h
> @@ -602,6 +602,11 @@ void irq_free_descs(unsigned int irq, unsigned int cnt);
> int irq_reserve_irqs(unsigned int from, unsigned int cnt);
> int __irq_reserve_irqs(int irq, unsigned int from, unsigned int cnt);
>
> +int __irq_realloc_desc(int at, int node, struct module *owner);
> +/* use macros to avoid needing export.h for THIS_MODULE */
You must be kidding. export.h has been split out from module.h exactly
to avoid horrible comments like the above and nonsense like this:
> +#define irq_realloc_desc_at(at, node) \
> + __irq_realloc_desc(at, node, THIS_MODULE)
> +
> diff --git a/kernel/irq/irqdesc.c b/kernel/irq/irqdesc.c
> index 3b9fb92..b48f65b 100644
> --- a/kernel/irq/irqdesc.c
> +++ b/kernel/irq/irqdesc.c
> @@ -99,6 +99,11 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(nr_irqs);
> static DEFINE_MUTEX(sparse_irq_lock);
> static DECLARE_BITMAP(allocated_irqs, IRQ_BITMAP_BITS);
>
> +static bool __irq_is_reserved(int irq)
> +{
> + return !!test_bit(irq, allocated_irqs);
What's the point of this? Why not use test_bit() directly in the code?
If we really want this to be a function, then it should be inline and
it could do without the pointless and !! nonsense.
> static RADIX_TREE(irq_desc_tree, GFP_KERNEL);
> @@ -410,6 +415,27 @@ __irq_alloc_descs(int irq, unsigned int from, unsigned int cnt, int node,
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__irq_alloc_descs);
>
> /**
> + * irq_realloc_desc - allocate irq descriptor for irq that is already reserved
And of course you are documenting crap again.
> + * @irq: Allocate for specific irq number if irq >= 0
> + * @node: Preferred node on which the irq descriptor should be allocated
> + * @owner: Owning module (can be NULL)
> + *
> + * Returns the irq number or error code
> + */
> +int __ref
> +__irq_realloc_desc(int irq, int node, struct module *owner)
What's the point of this line split ?
> +{
> + if (!__irq_is_reserved(irq))
> + return -EINVAL;
So this function can operate safely w/o holding sparse_irq_lock?
> + if (irq_to_desc(irq))
> + free_desc(irq);
You unconditionally throw away an existing irq descriptor? No, you
should bail out here. The function name is a misnomer as it does not
match the funciton description:
irq_realloc_desc - allocate irq descriptor for irq that is already reserved
You want to allocate an irq descriptor for a reserved irq. That's what
the function is about, not about reallocating an existing irq
descriptor.
So what you want is:
irq_alloc_reserved_desc - allocate irq descriptor for irq that is already reserved
and then bail out if the irq descriptor already exists.
> + return alloc_descs(irq, 1, node, owner);
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__irq_realloc_desc);
What's the point of exporting this?
Thanks,
tglx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-06-10 20:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-06-07 22:30 [PATCH v3 00/27] x86, irq: support ioapic device hotplug Yinghai Lu
2013-06-07 22:30 ` [PATCH v3 01/27] x86, irq: Change irq_remap_modify_chip_defaults to static Yinghai Lu
2013-06-07 22:30 ` [PATCH v3 02/27] x86, irq: Modify irq chip once for irq remapping Yinghai Lu
2013-06-09 14:54 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2013-06-10 23:17 ` Yinghai Lu
2013-06-07 22:30 ` [PATCH v3 03/27] x86, irq: Print out MSI/MSI-X clearly Yinghai Lu
2013-06-07 22:30 ` [PATCH v3 04/27] x86, irq: Show MSI-X in /proc/interrupt Yinghai Lu
2013-06-07 22:30 ` [PATCH v3 05/27] x86, irq: Make dmar_msi/hpet_msi irq_chip name consistent Yinghai Lu
2013-06-09 15:16 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2013-06-10 23:40 ` Yinghai Lu
2013-06-07 22:30 ` [PATCH v3 06/27] ia64, irq: Add dummy create_irq_nr() Yinghai Lu
2013-06-09 15:22 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2013-06-10 23:41 ` Yinghai Lu
2013-06-11 21:52 ` Luck, Tony
2013-06-07 22:30 ` [PATCH v3 07/27] iommu, irq: Allocate irq_desc for dmar_msi with local node Yinghai Lu
2013-06-09 15:31 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2013-06-10 23:43 ` Yinghai Lu
2013-06-07 22:30 ` [PATCH v3 08/27] x86, irq: kill create_irq() Yinghai Lu
2013-06-09 15:35 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2013-06-07 22:30 ` [PATCH v3 09/27] x86, irq: Convert irq_2_pin list to generic list Yinghai Lu
2013-06-09 15:52 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2013-06-07 22:30 ` [PATCH v3 10/27] genirq: Split __irq_reserve_irqs from irq_alloc_descs Yinghai Lu
2013-06-10 13:51 ` Alexander Gordeev
2013-06-10 19:16 ` Yinghai Lu
2013-06-10 19:42 ` Alexander Gordeev
2013-06-10 19:39 ` Thomas Gleixner
2013-06-10 23:55 ` Yinghai Lu
2013-06-07 22:30 ` [PATCH v3 11/27] x86, irq: Add realloc_irq_and_cfg_at() Yinghai Lu
2013-06-09 19:13 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2013-06-10 20:13 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2013-06-07 22:30 ` [PATCH v3 12/27] x86, irq: Move down arch_early_irq_init() Yinghai Lu
2013-06-07 22:30 ` [PATCH v3 13/27] x86, irq: Split out alloc_ioapic_save_registers() Yinghai Lu
2013-06-07 22:31 ` [PATCH v3 14/27] xen, irq: call irq_realloc_desc_at() at first Yinghai Lu
2013-06-07 22:31 ` [PATCH v3 15/27] x86, irq: pre-reserve irq range/realloc for booting path Yinghai Lu
2013-06-07 22:31 ` [PATCH v3 16/27] x86, irq: Add ioapic_gsi_to_irq Yinghai Lu
2013-06-07 22:31 ` [PATCH v3 17/27] genirq: Bail out early in free_desc() Yinghai Lu
2013-06-10 20:43 ` Thomas Gleixner
2013-06-07 22:31 ` [PATCH v3 18/27] x86, irq: More strict checking about registering ioapic Yinghai Lu
2013-06-07 22:31 ` [PATCH v3 19/27] x86, irq: Make mp_register_ioapic handle hot-added ioapic Yinghai Lu
2013-06-07 22:31 ` [PATCH v3 20/27] x86, irq: Add mp_unregister_ioapic to handle hot-remove ioapic Yinghai Lu
2013-06-07 22:31 ` [PATCH v3 21/27] x86, irq: Make ioapics loop skip blank slots Yinghai Lu
2013-06-07 22:31 ` [PATCH v3 22/27] x86, ioapic: Find usable ioapic id for 64bit Yinghai Lu
2013-06-07 22:31 ` [PATCH v3 23/27] x86: Move declaration for mp_register_ioapic() Yinghai Lu
2013-06-07 22:31 ` [PATCH v3 24/27] PCI, x86: Make ioapic hotplug support built-in Yinghai Lu
2013-06-07 22:31 ` [PATCH v3 25/27] PCI, x86, ACPI: Link acpi ioapic register to ioapic Yinghai Lu
2013-06-07 22:31 ` [PATCH v3 26/27] PCI, x86, ACPI: Enable ioapic hotplug support with acpi host bridge Yinghai Lu
2013-06-07 22:31 ` [PATCH v3 27/27] PCI, x86, ACPI: get ioapic address from acpi device Yinghai Lu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.LFD.2.02.1306102144300.22970@ionos \
--to=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=sebastian@breakpoint.cc \
--cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).