linux-pci.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sebastian Ott <sebott@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Yijing Wang <wangyijing@huawei.com>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	Gerald Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@de.ibm.com>,
	Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>,
	Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>,
	linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
	Wuyun <wuyun.wu@huawei.com>, Xinwei Hu <huxinwei@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] s390/MSI: Use standard mask and unmask funtions
Date: Fri, 4 Jul 2014 16:28:32 +0200 (CEST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.11.1407041623560.1624@denkbrett> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1404461764-6520-1-git-send-email-wangyijing@huawei.com>

On Fri, 4 Jul 2014, Yijing Wang wrote:
> MSI irqchip in s390 has its own mask and unmask MSI irq
> functions, zpci_enable_irq() and zpci_disable_irq().
> They mask and unmask MSI irq in standard ways, no arch
> special. MSI driver provides two global standard functions
> mask_msi_irq() and unmask_msi_irq(). Local zpci_enable_irq()
> and zpci_disable_irq() are almost the same as the standard
> two. the difference is local mask/unmask functions
> read the mask status before mask and unmask everytime.
> Then change the value and rewrite to hardware. In standard
> functions, save the mask status after mask and unmask msi
> irq, and use the cached status to change the mask status.
> When we mask or unmask a MSI irq, we always cache its
> mask status except we know need not to cache it, like in
> pci_msi_shutdown. So use the standard functions to replace
> the local is safe.

Thanks, for doing that!
At first glance the last hunk looks funny.

> 
> Signed-off-by: Yijing Wang <wangyijing@huawei.com>
> ---
>  arch/s390/pci/pci.c |   49 ++++++-------------------------------------------
>  1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/s390/pci/pci.c b/arch/s390/pci/pci.c
> index 9ddc51e..01fa289 100644
> --- a/arch/s390/pci/pci.c
> +++ b/arch/s390/pci/pci.c
> @@ -48,13 +48,10 @@
>  static LIST_HEAD(zpci_list);
>  static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(zpci_list_lock);
> 
> -static void zpci_enable_irq(struct irq_data *data);
> -static void zpci_disable_irq(struct irq_data *data);
> -
>  static struct irq_chip zpci_irq_chip = {
>  	.name = "zPCI",
> -	.irq_unmask = zpci_enable_irq,
> -	.irq_mask = zpci_disable_irq,
> +	.irq_unmask = mask_msi_irq,
> +	.irq_mask = unmask_msi_irq,
>  };
> 
>  static DECLARE_BITMAP(zpci_domain, ZPCI_NR_DEVICES);
> @@ -244,43 +241,6 @@ static int zpci_cfg_store(struct zpci_dev *zdev, int offset, u32 val, u8 len)
>  	return rc;
>  }
> 
> -static int zpci_msi_set_mask_bits(struct msi_desc *msi, u32 mask, u32 flag)
> -{
> -	int offset, pos;
> -	u32 mask_bits;
> -
> -	if (msi->msi_attrib.is_msix) {
> -		offset = msi->msi_attrib.entry_nr * PCI_MSIX_ENTRY_SIZE +
> -			PCI_MSIX_ENTRY_VECTOR_CTRL;
> -		msi->masked = readl(msi->mask_base + offset);
> -		writel(flag, msi->mask_base + offset);
> -	} else if (msi->msi_attrib.maskbit) {
> -		pos = (long) msi->mask_base;
> -		pci_read_config_dword(msi->dev, pos, &mask_bits);
> -		mask_bits &= ~(mask);
> -		mask_bits |= flag & mask;
> -		pci_write_config_dword(msi->dev, pos, mask_bits);
> -	} else
> -		return 0;
> -
> -	msi->msi_attrib.maskbit = !!flag;
> -	return 1;
> -}
> -
> -static void zpci_enable_irq(struct irq_data *data)
> -{
> -	struct msi_desc *msi = irq_get_msi_desc(data->irq);
> -
> -	zpci_msi_set_mask_bits(msi, 1, 0);
> -}
> -
> -static void zpci_disable_irq(struct irq_data *data)
> -{
> -	struct msi_desc *msi = irq_get_msi_desc(data->irq);
> -
> -	zpci_msi_set_mask_bits(msi, 1, 1);
> -}
> -
>  void pcibios_fixup_bus(struct pci_bus *bus)
>  {
>  }
> @@ -487,7 +447,10 @@ void arch_teardown_msi_irqs(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> 
>  	/* Release MSI interrupts */
>  	list_for_each_entry(msi, &pdev->msi_list, list) {
> -		zpci_msi_set_mask_bits(msi, 1, 1);
> +		if (msi->msi_attrib.is_msix)
> +			default_msi_mask_irq(msi, 1, 1);
> +		else
> +			default_msix_mask_irq(msi, 1);

This one looks inverted.

>  		irq_set_msi_desc(msi->irq, NULL);
>  		irq_free_desc(msi->irq);
>  		msi->msg.address_lo = 0;

Regards,
Sebastian


  reply	other threads:[~2014-07-04 14:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-07-04  8:16 [PATCH 2/5] s390/MSI: Use standard mask and unmask funtions Yijing Wang
2014-07-04 14:28 ` Sebastian Ott [this message]
2014-07-08  1:33   ` Yijing Wang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.LFD.2.11.1407041623560.1624@denkbrett \
    --to=sebott@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=gerald.schaefer@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=huxinwei@huawei.com \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=wangyijing@huawei.com \
    --cc=wuyun.wu@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).