linux-pci.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Keith Busch <keith.busch@intel.com>
To: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
Cc: Keith Busch <keith.busch@intel.com>,
	Yijing Wang <wangyijing@huawei.com>,
	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, Jordan_Hargrave@Dell.com,
	Jon Mason <jdmason@kudzu.us>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI: update device mps when doing pci hotplug
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2014 13:04:19 -0600 (MDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LRH.2.03.1407291151210.5109@AMR> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1406652178.1011.191.camel@ul30vt.home>

On Tue, 29 Jul 2014, Alex Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2014-07-29 at 10:30 -0600, Keith Busch wrote:
>> On Tue, 29 Jul 2014, Alex Williamson wrote:
>>> On Tue, 2014-07-29 at 16:17 +0800, Yijing Wang wrote:
>>>> Currently we don't update device's mps value when doing
>>>> pci device hot-add. The hot-added device's mps will be set
>>>> to default value (128B). But the upstream port device's mps
>>>> may be larger than 128B which was set by firmware during
>>>> system bootup. In this case the new added device may not
>>>> work normally.
>>>
>>> Apologies if we rehash some previously discussed topics while I try to
>>> cover for Bjorn while he's out.  By "normally", do you mean "optimally"?
>>> The device should be functional with a lower mps setting, right?
>>
>> You'd think so, but some platforms don't work. A pci-e trace showed
>> TLPs exceeding MPS when parent device at 256B and the end device left
>> at 128B. Even if that's a platform bug, I think we still want it to work.
>
> But if it's a platform bug for a non-compliant device, should it be
> handled as a quirk rather than standard configuration?  Thanks,

I'm not even sure it is a platform bug, but that was just a guess. The
way the devices are configured, it appears they behave inline with the
spec (from table 7-13):

   "
   Max_Payload_size -- This field sets maximum TLP payload size for the
   Function. As a Receiver, the Function must handle TLPs as large as the set
   value. As a Transmitter, the Function must not generate TLPs exceeding the
   set value.
   "

It sounds like it allows a transmitter to generate a TLP that the receiver
can't handle, but I don't know if that was the intent. :)

  reply	other threads:[~2014-07-29 19:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-07-29  8:17 [PATCH] PCI: update device mps when doing pci hotplug Yijing Wang
2014-07-29 16:18 ` Alex Williamson
2014-07-29 16:30   ` Keith Busch
2014-07-29 16:42     ` Alex Williamson
2014-07-29 19:04       ` Keith Busch [this message]
2014-07-30  3:35       ` Yijing Wang
2014-07-30  3:27   ` Yijing Wang
2014-07-30  3:33 ` Ethan Zhao
2014-07-30  3:42   ` Yijing Wang
2014-07-30  3:58     ` Ethan Zhao
2014-07-30  4:42       ` Yijing Wang
2014-07-30  6:26 ` Ethan Zhao
2014-07-30  6:57   ` Yijing Wang
2014-07-30  7:17     ` Ethan Zhao
2014-07-30  8:13       ` Yijing Wang
2014-07-30  8:38         ` Ethan Zhao
2014-07-30  9:17           ` Yijing Wang
2014-07-30 19:41             ` Jordan_Hargrave
2014-09-03 19:20               ` Bjorn Helgaas
2014-09-03 22:42 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2014-09-04  6:12   ` Yijing Wang
2014-09-04 13:16     ` Bjorn Helgaas
2014-09-05  1:27       ` Yijing Wang
2014-09-05 14:37         ` Keith Busch
2014-09-24 22:41         ` Keith Busch
2014-09-24 23:30           ` Bjorn Helgaas
2014-09-25  1:23             ` Yijing Wang
2014-09-25 16:46               ` Keith Busch
2014-09-26  3:22                 ` Yijing Wang
2014-10-02 15:31                   ` Jordan_Hargrave
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2014-07-29  8:23 Yijing Wang
2013-02-05  3:55 Yijing Wang
2013-05-28  3:15 ` Yijing Wang
2013-07-29 23:33   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2013-07-30  3:20     ` Yijing Wang
2013-07-30  3:42       ` Bjorn Helgaas
2013-07-30 22:29         ` Bjorn Helgaas
2013-07-31  9:15           ` Yijing Wang
2013-07-31 17:53             ` Bjorn Helgaas
2013-07-31 20:42               ` Bjorn Helgaas
2013-08-01  1:23                 ` Yijing Wang
2013-08-01  1:21               ` Yijing Wang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.LRH.2.03.1407291151210.5109@AMR \
    --to=keith.busch@intel.com \
    --cc=Jordan_Hargrave@Dell.com \
    --cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=jdmason@kudzu.us \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=wangyijing@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).