Linux PCI subsystem development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>
To: peng.guo@montage-tech.com
Cc: linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, bhelgaas@google.com,
	dave@stgolabs.net, jic23@kernel.org, dave.jiang@intel.com,
	alison.schofield@intel.com, vishal.l.verma@intel.com,
	ira.weiny@intel.com, djbw@kernel.org, johnny.li@montage-tech.com,
	jingzhong.yang@montage-tech.com, engguopeng@buaa.edu.cn
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] PCI: Add MMIO Capabilities Register Block definitions
Date: Sun, 16 Aug 2026 13:19:48 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aoGc1Ie-S5-Ytsp_@wunner.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260816084957.3316727-2-peng.guo@montage-tech.com>

On Sun, Aug 16, 2026 at 04:49:56PM +0800, peng.guo@montage-tech.com wrote:
> The PCIe Management Message Passthrough via MMIO Mailbox ECN defines
> the MMIO Capabilities Register Block (MCAP). MCAP contains an array
> header followed by capability headers that describe the ID, version,
> location, size, and vendor of each MMIO capability.

That ECN went into PCIe r6.2.  For ECNs that are already part of the
PCIe Base Spec, it's better to cite the section in the latest spec
revision, i.e. PCIe r7.0 sec 6.35, rather than the ECN that originally
introduced the feature.  Reviewers (like me) generally have the latest
spec revision at hand, but not every ECN.

Otherwise this is
Reviewed-by: Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-08-16 11:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-16  8:49 [PATCH 0/2] PCI/CXL: Distinguish CXL capabilities in MCAP peng.guo
2026-08-16  8:49 ` [PATCH 1/2] PCI: Add MMIO Capabilities Register Block definitions peng.guo
2026-08-16  9:15   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-16 11:19   ` Lukas Wunner [this message]
2026-08-16  8:49 ` [PATCH 2/2] cxl/core: Skip non-CXL capabilities in MCAP peng.guo
2026-08-16  9:19   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-16 11:22   ` Lukas Wunner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aoGc1Ie-S5-Ytsp_@wunner.de \
    --to=lukas@wunner.de \
    --cc=alison.schofield@intel.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=dave.jiang@intel.com \
    --cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
    --cc=djbw@kernel.org \
    --cc=engguopeng@buaa.edu.cn \
    --cc=ira.weiny@intel.com \
    --cc=jic23@kernel.org \
    --cc=jingzhong.yang@montage-tech.com \
    --cc=johnny.li@montage-tech.com \
    --cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=peng.guo@montage-tech.com \
    --cc=vishal.l.verma@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox