From: Niklas Cassel <cassel@kernel.org>
To: sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev
Cc: Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com>, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] PCI: dw-rockchip: Move the INTx irq setup to probe
Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2026 14:03:04 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <arJueF46fIYDiwUp@ryzen> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260922025140.5B4F31F000FF@smtp.kernel.org>
On Tue, Sep 22, 2026 at 02:51:39AM +0000, sashiko-bot@kernel.org wrote:
> Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
> - [High] pcie: missing dw_pcie_host_deinit() on error paths causes UAF
> - [High] pcie: late INTx IRQ domain registration breaks downstream INTx interrupts
> --
>
> commit af2f81da80dcb1ab2a4b7035c602bf3d2a40f1c9
> Author: Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com>
>
> PCI: dw-rockchip: Move the INTx irq setup to probe
>
> The commit moves INTx IRQ domain setup out of the host ops .init() callback
> and into rockchip_pcie_configure_rc() to avoid leaking the domain upon
> controller reset. It performs the IRQ initialization immediately after
> dw_pcie_host_init() completes.
>
> > diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-dw-rockchip.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-dw-rockchip.c
> > index af26a07c0c9e5..59d9a1b095df6 100644
> > --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-dw-rockchip.c
> > +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-dw-rockchip.c
>
> [ ... ]
>
> > @@ -739,6 +725,24 @@ static int rockchip_pcie_configure_rc(struct platform_device *pdev,
> > return ret;
> > }
> >
> > + /*
> > + * This is done here instead of in the host ops .init() callback,
> > + * which is also re-run by .reset_root_port(), so that the INTx irq
> > + * domain is only created once, at probe time.
> > + */
> > + irq = of_irq_get_byname(dev->of_node, "legacy");
>
> [Severity: High]
> Does moving the INTx IRQ domain creation here cause downstream devices to lose
> their INTx interrupts?
>
> Since rockchip_pcie_configure_rc() calls dw_pcie_host_init() right before this,
> which internally invokes pci_host_probe() to enumerate the PCIe bus, downstream
> devices will be probed before this new code is reached. When those devices
> attempt to map their legacy INTx interrupts via the device tree, they won't
> find the IRQ domain since it hasn't been created yet, which seems like it would
> cause the mapping to silently fail.
>
> This architectural issue appears to remain unaddressed at the end of the patch
> series.
This appears like a legit concern.
I was the one who recommended that we call the of_irq_get_byname(), from
looking at e.g. pcie-qcom.c.
But I incorrectly said we should do it after dw_pcie_host_init().
Looking at pcie-qcom.c platform_get_irq_byname_optional() call was before
dw_pcie_host_init(). But if we look at e.g. pcie-tegra194.c, the
platform_get_irq_byname() calls are before the tegra_pcie_config_rp() call,
which calls tegra_pcie_init_controller(), which calls dw_pcie_host_init().
So I think Sashiko is right, of_irq_get_byname() (and the IRQ domain creation)
probably has to be done before calling dw_pcie_host_init().
If we do that, the other problem reported by Sashiko will probably also be
resolved, since you will return error before calling dw_pcie_host_init().
Kind regards,
Niklas
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-22 12:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-22 2:36 [PATCH v3 0/3] Small INTx fixes for Rockchip's dwc based PCIe controller driver Shawn Lin
2026-09-22 2:37 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] PCI: dw-rockchip: Move the INTx irq setup to probe Shawn Lin
2026-09-22 2:51 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-22 12:03 ` Niklas Cassel [this message]
2026-09-22 9:56 ` Niklas Cassel
2026-09-22 2:37 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] PCI: dw-rockchip: Make the INTx irq setup devm-managed Shawn Lin
2026-09-22 2:54 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-22 9:58 ` Niklas Cassel
2026-09-22 2:37 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] PCI: dw-rockchip: Mask the INTx IRQ while the controller clocks are gated Shawn Lin
2026-09-22 2:51 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-23 9:13 ` [PATCH v3 0/3] Small INTx fixes for Rockchip's dwc based PCIe controller driver Diederik de Haas
2026-09-23 9:21 ` Shawn Lin
2026-09-23 15:25 ` Niklas Cassel
2026-09-24 3:27 ` Shawn Lin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=arJueF46fIYDiwUp@ryzen \
--to=cassel@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=shawn.lin@rock-chips.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox