From: Niklas Cassel <cassel@kernel.org>
To: Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com>
Cc: Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@kernel.org>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
Diederik de Haas <diederik@cknow-tech.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] PCI: dw-rockchip: Move the INTx irq setup to probe
Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2026 10:51:34 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <arTklmgPsyKzQf93@ryzen> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1790222793-77182-1-git-send-email-shawn.lin@rock-chips.com>
On Thu, Sep 24, 2026 at 12:06:33PM +0800, Shawn Lin wrote:
> Since commit b376b3ff9cb0 ("PCI: dw-rockchip: Implement .reset_root_port()
> and use for link down"), .reset_root_port() re-runs the host ops .init()
> callback to reprogram the Root Complex after a controller reset. That
> works for the register programming, but .init() is not re-entrant: it
> also creates the INTx irq domain and installs the chained INTx handler.
> Every root port reset therefore ends up with a second irq domain
> registered for the same fwnode: the previous one is leaked, as it is
> never removed, and worse, the INTx virqs of the downstream PCI devices
> were allocated in the previous irq domain and are never re-mapped, while
> the chained handler now looks up virqs in the new, empty domain. After a
> link down recovery, INTx interrupts are silently lost.
>
> Fix it by moving the of_irq_get_byname() lookup, the INTx irq domain
> creation and the chained handler installation out of .init() and into
> rockchip_pcie_configure_rc(), just before dw_pcie_host_init(). The
> lookup has to happen before the host is initialized, because
> dw_pcie_host_init() enumerates the bus and probes the downstream
> devices, and pci_assign_irq() maps their INTx interrupts at that point:
> if the domain does not exist yet, the mapping fails and the devices end
> up without a usable INTx. This also mirrors how the qcom driver requests
> its global IRQ, and leaves .init() with nothing but idempotent register
> programming, so both .reset_root_port() and dw_pcie_resume_noirq() can
> safely re-run it. Re-running of_irq_get_byname() on every resume is also
> gone.
>
> Fixes: b376b3ff9cb0 ("PCI: dw-rockchip: Implement .reset_root_port() and use for link down")
> Suggested-by: Niklas Cassel <cassel@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com>
Reviewed-by: Niklas Cassel <cassel@kernel.org>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-24 8:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-24 4:06 [PATCH v4] PCI: dw-rockchip: Move the INTx irq setup to probe Shawn Lin
2026-09-24 4:15 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-24 8:51 ` Niklas Cassel [this message]
2026-09-24 10:17 ` Diederik de Haas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=arTklmgPsyKzQf93@ryzen \
--to=cassel@kernel.org \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=diederik@cknow-tech.com \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=mani@kernel.org \
--cc=shawn.lin@rock-chips.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox