Linux PCI subsystem development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>
To: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>,
	Raag Jadav <raag.jadav@intel.com>,
	Riana Tauro <riana.tauro@intel.com>,
	Yury Murashka <yurypm@arista.com>,
	Matthew W Carlis <mattc@purestorage.com>,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
	Mahesh J Salgaonkar <mahesh@linux.ibm.com>,
	Oliver OHalloran <oohall@gmail.com>,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
	Aravind Iddamsetty <aravind.iddamsetty@intel.com>,
	Srinivasa Adatrao <srinivasa.adatrao@intel.com>,
	Terry Bowman <terry.bowman@amd.com>,
	Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] PCI/DPC: Avoid access to non-existent AER capability
Date: Sun, 15 Nov 2026 18:49:23 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <avnwo7TeDBimPwWG@wunner.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <74fe0d79-dc90-4c05-ba9c-9a0eec1ada48@linux.intel.com>

On Tue, Sep 29, 2026 at 11:49:40AM -0700, Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan wrote:
> On 9/27/2026 11:02 AM, Lukas Wunner wrote:
> > Downstream Port Containment does not mandate presence of an Advanced Error
> > Reporting capability, so a Downstream Port may support DPC, but not AER
> > (PCIe r7.1 sec 6.2.11.2).
[...]
> > - dpc_get_aer_uncorrect_severity() uses it to discern whether a Fatal or
> >   Non-Fatal Error triggered DPC.  Access the Device Status Register
> >   instead, in accordance with PCIe r7.1 sec 6.2.5.
> 
> This changes behavior not only for AER-incapable ports, but also for
> the AER-capable ones.  PCIe r7.1 sec 7.5.3.5 says for the Fatal/
> Non-Fatal Error Detected bits:
> 
>   "For Functions supporting Advanced Error Handling, errors are logged
>    in this register regardless of the settings of the Uncorrectable
>    Error Mask register."
> 
> The old code only considered unmasked errors, the new code also picks
> up masked ones.  So a masked Fatal error (e.g. Surprise Down) alongside
> the unmasked Non-Fatal error which triggered DPC is now reported as
> Fatal.  Stale bits from earlier masked errors can have the same effect.
> 
> Since this is tagged for stable, how about keeping the AER-based logic
> when dev->aer_cap is present and using DEVSTA only as a fallback?

An excellent observation, I've changed it as you've suggested.
Thanks for the thoughtful review!

Lukas

  reply	other threads:[~2026-11-15 17:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-27 18:02 [PATCH 0/7] Error reporting for AER-incapable devices Lukas Wunner
2026-09-27 18:02 ` [PATCH 1/7] PCI/DPC: Avoid access to non-existent AER capability Lukas Wunner
2026-09-27 18:27   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-29 18:49   ` Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
2026-11-15 17:49     ` Lukas Wunner [this message]
2026-09-27 18:02 ` [PATCH 2/7] PCI/DPC: Reinstate support for AER-incapable ports Lukas Wunner
2026-09-27 18:26   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-29 19:04   ` Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
2026-11-15 18:07     ` Lukas Wunner
2026-09-27 18:02 ` [PATCH 3/7] PCI/ERR: Avoid stale error status bits on recovery failure Lukas Wunner
2026-09-27 18:31   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-27 18:57     ` Lukas Wunner
2026-09-29 19:20   ` Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
2026-09-27 18:02 ` [PATCH 4/7] PCI/AER: Drop AER native check from handles_cxl_errors() Lukas Wunner
2026-09-27 18:26   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-28 20:58   ` Bowman, Terry
2026-09-29 19:24   ` Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
2026-09-27 18:02 ` [PATCH 5/7] PCI/AER: Move AER capability check out of pcie_aer_is_native() Lukas Wunner
2026-09-27 18:30   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-29 19:47   ` Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
2026-09-27 18:02 ` [PATCH 6/7] PCI/AER: Renumber severity constants Lukas Wunner
2026-09-27 18:29   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-27 19:23     ` Lukas Wunner
2026-09-29 19:55   ` Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
2026-09-27 18:02 ` [PATCH 7/7] PCI/AER: Enable baseline capability error reporting Lukas Wunner
2026-09-27 18:33   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-29 21:01   ` Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
2026-09-30  7:08     ` Lukas Wunner
2026-10-01 17:44       ` Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=avnwo7TeDBimPwWG@wunner.de \
    --to=lukas@wunner.de \
    --cc=aravind.iddamsetty@intel.com \
    --cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
    --cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=mahesh@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=mattc@purestorage.com \
    --cc=oohall@gmail.com \
    --cc=raag.jadav@intel.com \
    --cc=riana.tauro@intel.com \
    --cc=sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=srinivasa.adatrao@intel.com \
    --cc=terry.bowman@amd.com \
    --cc=yurypm@arista.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox