From: Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>
To: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>,
Raag Jadav <raag.jadav@intel.com>,
Riana Tauro <riana.tauro@intel.com>,
Yury Murashka <yurypm@arista.com>,
Matthew W Carlis <mattc@purestorage.com>,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
Mahesh J Salgaonkar <mahesh@linux.ibm.com>,
Oliver OHalloran <oohall@gmail.com>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
Aravind Iddamsetty <aravind.iddamsetty@intel.com>,
Srinivasa Adatrao <srinivasa.adatrao@intel.com>,
Terry Bowman <terry.bowman@amd.com>,
Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] PCI/DPC: Avoid access to non-existent AER capability
Date: Sun, 15 Nov 2026 18:49:23 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <avnwo7TeDBimPwWG@wunner.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <74fe0d79-dc90-4c05-ba9c-9a0eec1ada48@linux.intel.com>
On Tue, Sep 29, 2026 at 11:49:40AM -0700, Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan wrote:
> On 9/27/2026 11:02 AM, Lukas Wunner wrote:
> > Downstream Port Containment does not mandate presence of an Advanced Error
> > Reporting capability, so a Downstream Port may support DPC, but not AER
> > (PCIe r7.1 sec 6.2.11.2).
[...]
> > - dpc_get_aer_uncorrect_severity() uses it to discern whether a Fatal or
> > Non-Fatal Error triggered DPC. Access the Device Status Register
> > instead, in accordance with PCIe r7.1 sec 6.2.5.
>
> This changes behavior not only for AER-incapable ports, but also for
> the AER-capable ones. PCIe r7.1 sec 7.5.3.5 says for the Fatal/
> Non-Fatal Error Detected bits:
>
> "For Functions supporting Advanced Error Handling, errors are logged
> in this register regardless of the settings of the Uncorrectable
> Error Mask register."
>
> The old code only considered unmasked errors, the new code also picks
> up masked ones. So a masked Fatal error (e.g. Surprise Down) alongside
> the unmasked Non-Fatal error which triggered DPC is now reported as
> Fatal. Stale bits from earlier masked errors can have the same effect.
>
> Since this is tagged for stable, how about keeping the AER-based logic
> when dev->aer_cap is present and using DEVSTA only as a fallback?
An excellent observation, I've changed it as you've suggested.
Thanks for the thoughtful review!
Lukas
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-15 17:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-27 18:02 [PATCH 0/7] Error reporting for AER-incapable devices Lukas Wunner
2026-09-27 18:02 ` [PATCH 1/7] PCI/DPC: Avoid access to non-existent AER capability Lukas Wunner
2026-09-27 18:27 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-29 18:49 ` Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
2026-11-15 17:49 ` Lukas Wunner [this message]
2026-09-27 18:02 ` [PATCH 2/7] PCI/DPC: Reinstate support for AER-incapable ports Lukas Wunner
2026-09-27 18:26 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-29 19:04 ` Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
2026-11-15 18:07 ` Lukas Wunner
2026-09-27 18:02 ` [PATCH 3/7] PCI/ERR: Avoid stale error status bits on recovery failure Lukas Wunner
2026-09-27 18:31 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-27 18:57 ` Lukas Wunner
2026-09-29 19:20 ` Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
2026-09-27 18:02 ` [PATCH 4/7] PCI/AER: Drop AER native check from handles_cxl_errors() Lukas Wunner
2026-09-27 18:26 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-28 20:58 ` Bowman, Terry
2026-09-29 19:24 ` Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
2026-09-27 18:02 ` [PATCH 5/7] PCI/AER: Move AER capability check out of pcie_aer_is_native() Lukas Wunner
2026-09-27 18:30 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-29 19:47 ` Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
2026-09-27 18:02 ` [PATCH 6/7] PCI/AER: Renumber severity constants Lukas Wunner
2026-09-27 18:29 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-27 19:23 ` Lukas Wunner
2026-09-29 19:55 ` Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
2026-09-27 18:02 ` [PATCH 7/7] PCI/AER: Enable baseline capability error reporting Lukas Wunner
2026-09-27 18:33 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-29 21:01 ` Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
2026-09-30 7:08 ` Lukas Wunner
2026-10-01 17:44 ` Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=avnwo7TeDBimPwWG@wunner.de \
--to=lukas@wunner.de \
--cc=aravind.iddamsetty@intel.com \
--cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
--cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=mahesh@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=mattc@purestorage.com \
--cc=oohall@gmail.com \
--cc=raag.jadav@intel.com \
--cc=riana.tauro@intel.com \
--cc=sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com \
--cc=srinivasa.adatrao@intel.com \
--cc=terry.bowman@amd.com \
--cc=yurypm@arista.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox