From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
To: Hans Zhang <hans.zhang@cixtech.com>,
Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org>,
Manikandan Karunakaran Pillai <mpillai@cadence.com>
Cc: "bhelgaas@google.com" <bhelgaas@google.com>,
"lpieralisi@kernel.org" <lpieralisi@kernel.org>,
"kw@linux.com" <kw@linux.com>,
"manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org"
<manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>,
"robh@kernel.org" <robh@kernel.org>,
"krzk+dt@kernel.org" <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
"conor+dt@kernel.org" <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
"peter.chen@cixtech.com" <peter.chen@cixtech.com>,
"linux-pci@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
"devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/5] dt-bindings: pci: cadence: Extend compatible for new EP configurations
Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2025 18:21:50 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b25406dc-affd-48f2-bccb-48ee01bdfcf1@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5334e87c-edf3-4dd9-a6d5-265cd279dbdc@cixtech.com>
On 25/04/2025 17:33, Hans Zhang wrote:
>
>
> On 2025/4/25 22:48, Conor Dooley wrote:
>> On Fri, Apr 25, 2025 at 02:19:11AM +0000, Manikandan Karunakaran Pillai wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Apr 24, 2025 at 04:29:35PM +0100, Conor Dooley wrote:
>>>>> On Thu, Apr 24, 2025 at 09:04:41AM +0800,hans.zhang@cixtech.com wrote:
>>>>>> From: Manikandan K Pillai<mpillai@cadence.com>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Document the compatible property for HPA (High Performance
>>>> Architecture)
>>>>>> PCIe controller EP configuration.
>>>>> Please explain what makes the new architecture sufficiently different
>>>>> from the existing one such that a fallback compatible does not work.
>>>>>
>>>>> Same applies to the other binding patch.
>>>> Additionally, since this IP is likely in use on your sky1 SoC, why is a
>>>> soc-specific compatible for your integration not needed?
>>>>
>>> The sky1 SoC support patches will be developed and submitted by the Sky1
>>> team separately.
>> Why? Cixtech sent this patchset, they should send it with their user.
>
> Hi Conor,
>
> Please look at the communication history of this website.
>
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-pci/patch/CH2PPF4D26F8E1C1CBD2A866C59AA55CD7AA2A12@CH2PPF4D26F8E1C.namprd07.prod.outlook.com/
And in that thread I asked for Soc specific compatible. More than once.
Conor asks again.
I don't understand your answers at all.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-25 16:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-24 1:04 [PATCH v4 0/5] Enhance the PCIe controller driver hans.zhang
2025-04-24 1:04 ` [PATCH v4 1/5] dt-bindings: pci: cadence: Extend compatible for new RP configuration hans.zhang
2025-04-24 1:04 ` [PATCH v4 2/5] dt-bindings: pci: cadence: Extend compatible for new EP configurations hans.zhang
2025-04-24 15:29 ` Conor Dooley
2025-04-24 15:30 ` Conor Dooley
2025-04-25 2:19 ` Manikandan Karunakaran Pillai
2025-04-25 14:48 ` Conor Dooley
2025-04-25 15:33 ` Hans Zhang
2025-04-25 16:21 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski [this message]
2025-04-25 16:47 ` Hans Zhang
2025-04-27 3:55 ` Manikandan Karunakaran Pillai
2025-04-27 19:08 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2025-04-25 2:17 ` Manikandan Karunakaran Pillai
2025-04-24 1:04 ` [PATCH v4 3/5] PCI: cadence: Add header support for PCIe HPA controller hans.zhang
2025-04-24 3:36 ` Peter Chen (CIX)
2025-04-25 4:18 ` kernel test robot
2025-04-24 1:04 ` [PATCH v4 4/5] PCI: cadence: Add support for PCIe Endpoint " hans.zhang
2025-04-24 1:04 ` [PATCH v4 5/5] PCI: cadence: Add callback functions for RP and EP controller hans.zhang
2025-04-25 6:01 ` kernel test robot
2025-04-25 16:27 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2025-04-25 16:51 ` Hans Zhang
2025-04-27 3:52 ` Manikandan Karunakaran Pillai
2025-06-01 14:40 ` manivannan.sadhasivam
2025-06-02 1:24 ` Manikandan Karunakaran Pillai
2025-04-25 16:24 ` [PATCH v4 0/5] Enhance the PCIe controller driver Krzysztof Kozlowski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b25406dc-affd-48f2-bccb-48ee01bdfcf1@kernel.org \
--to=krzk@kernel.org \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=conor@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=hans.zhang@cixtech.com \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=kw@linux.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
--cc=manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org \
--cc=mpillai@cadence.com \
--cc=peter.chen@cixtech.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).