From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Return-Path: Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 1/3] perf: cavium: Support memory controller PMU counters To: Greg KH References: <131179fe-42e7-f286-5bd4-801f4c93d5f9@arm.com> <20170726145522.GC28875@nazgul.tnic> <20170726151314.GA10696@hc> <20170726153502.GE28875@nazgul.tnic> <20170726154515.GA11453@hc> <20170726155548.GF28875@nazgul.tnic> <20170726161949.GB15426@kroah.com> <20170726163049.GG28875@nazgul.tnic> <20170726173353.GB21705@kroah.com> <1a2eedea-040d-c746-eaf0-1d8085b3f2bf@gmail.com> <20170726200802.GA17722@kroah.com> From: David Daney Message-ID: Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2017 14:02:42 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20170726200802.GA17722@kroah.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Mark Rutland , Suzuki K Poulose , linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, Will Deacon , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Jan Glauber , Borislav Petkov , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+bjorn=helgaas.com@lists.infradead.org List-ID: On 07/26/2017 01:08 PM, Greg KH wrote: > On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 01:02:38PM -0700, David Daney wrote: >> On 07/26/2017 10:33 AM, Greg KH wrote: >>> On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 06:30:49PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote: >>>> On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 09:19:49AM -0700, Greg KH wrote: >>>>> On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 05:55:48PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote: >>>>>> On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 05:45:15PM +0200, Jan Glauber wrote: >>>>>>> The PMU/EDAC devices are all PCI devices do I need the 'struct pci_dev *'. >>>>>>> I'm not aware of other ways to access these devices. Please enlighten >>>>>>> me if I'm missing something. >>>>>> >>>>>> Me enlighten you on Cavium hardware?! You're funny. >>>>>> >>>>>> So I don't know whether the PCI hotplug code can run more than one >>>>>> function upon PCI ID detection. Probably Greg will say, write a >>>>>> multiplexer wrapper. :-) >>>>> >>>>> -ENOCONTEXT.... >>>>> >>>>> Anyway, pci questions are best asked on the linux-pci@vger list. And >>>>> yes, all PCI devices end up with a 'struct pci_dev *' automatically. >>>> >>>> Simple: so they have a PCI ID of a memory contoller and want to hotplug >>>> two drivers for it. And those two drivers should remain independent from >>>> each other. >>> >>> Hahahahaha, no. That's crazy, you were right in guessing what my answer >>> was going to be :) >>> >> >> >> Just to be clear about the situation, the device is a memory controller. It >> has two main behaviors we are interested in: >> >> A) Error Detection And Correction (EDAC). This should be connected to the >> kernel's EDAC subsystem. An existing driver (drivers/edac/thunderx_edac.c) >> does exactly this. >> >> B) Performance Counters for actions taken in the corresponding memory. This >> should be connected to the kernel's perf framework as an uncore-PMU (the >> subject of this patch set). >> >> It is a single PCI device. What should the driver architecture look like to >> connect it to two different kernel subsystems? > > Modify the drivers/edac/thunderx_edac.c code to add support for > performance counters. > Thanks Greg. This adds some clarity to the situation. This technique does slightly complicate the mapping of files and directories in the kernel source tree to maintainers. Also, if a given configuration disables CONFIG_EDAC there is some hackery needed to get the perf portion of the driver included. David Daney _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel