[PATCH v7 0/4] PCI: rockchip: Improve driver quality

[PATCH v7 0/4] PCI: rockchip: Improve driver quality

[Geraldo Nascimento]

During a 30-day debugging-run fighting quirky PCIe devices on RK3399
some quality improvements began to take form and after feedback from
community they reached more polished state.

This will ensure maximum chance of retraining to 5.0GT/s, on all four
lanes and fix async strobe TEST_WRITE disablement. On top of this,
standard PCIe defines are now used to reference registers from offset
at Capabilities Register.

Unfortunately, it seems Rockchip-IP PCIe is unable to handle 16-bit
register writes and there's risk of corrupting state of RW1C registers,
an issue raised by Bjorn Helgaas. There's little I could do to fix that,
so on this issue the situation remains the same.

---
V6 -> V7: drop RFC tag as per Heiko Stuebner's reminder, update cover
letter
V5 -> V6: reflow to 75 cols, use 5.0GTs instead of Gen2 nomenclature,
clarify strobe write adjustment and remove PHY_CFG_RD_MASK
V4 -> V5: fix build failure, reflow commit messages and also convert
registers for EP operation, all suggested by Ilpo
V3 -> V4: fix setting-up of TLS in Link Control and Status Register 2,
also adjust commit titles
V2 -> V3: correctly clean-up with standard PCIe defines as per Bjorn's
suggestion
V1 -> V2: use standard PCIe defines as suggested by Bjorn

Geraldo Nascimento (4):
  PCI: rockchip: Use standard PCIe defines
  PCI: rockchip: Set Target Link Speed before retraining
  phy: rockchip-pcie: Enable all four lanes if required
  phy: rockchip-pcie: Properly disable TEST_WRITE strobe signal

 drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rockchip-ep.c   |  4 +-
 drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rockchip-host.c | 48 +++++++++++----------
 drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rockchip.h      | 12 +-----
 drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-pcie.c    | 15 +++----
 4 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-)

-- 
2.49.0

[PATCH v7 1/4] PCI: rockchip: Use standard PCIe defines

[Geraldo Nascimento]

Current code uses custom-defined register offsets and bitfields for
standard PCIe registers. Change to using standard PCIe defines. Since
we are now using standard PCIe defines, drop unused custom-defined ones,
which are now referenced from offset at added Capabilities Register.

Suggested-By: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Geraldo Nascimento <geraldogabriel@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rockchip-ep.c   |  4 +-
 drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rockchip-host.c | 44 ++++++++++-----------
 drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rockchip.h      | 12 +-----
 3 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rockchip-ep.c b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rockchip-ep.c
index 55416b8311dd..300cd85fa035 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rockchip-ep.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rockchip-ep.c
@@ -518,9 +518,9 @@ static void rockchip_pcie_ep_retrain_link(struct rockchip_pcie *rockchip)
 {
 	u32 status;
 
-	status = rockchip_pcie_read(rockchip, PCIE_EP_CONFIG_LCS);
+	status = rockchip_pcie_read(rockchip, PCIE_EP_CONFIG_BASE + PCI_EXP_LNKCTL);
 	status |= PCI_EXP_LNKCTL_RL;
-	rockchip_pcie_write(rockchip, status, PCIE_EP_CONFIG_LCS);
+	rockchip_pcie_write(rockchip, status, PCIE_EP_CONFIG_BASE + PCI_EXP_LNKCTL);
 }
 
 static bool rockchip_pcie_ep_link_up(struct rockchip_pcie *rockchip)
diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rockchip-host.c b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rockchip-host.c
index b9e7a8710cf0..65653218b9ab 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rockchip-host.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rockchip-host.c
@@ -40,18 +40,18 @@ static void rockchip_pcie_enable_bw_int(struct rockchip_pcie *rockchip)
 {
 	u32 status;
 
-	status = rockchip_pcie_read(rockchip, PCIE_RC_CONFIG_LCS);
+	status = rockchip_pcie_read(rockchip, PCIE_RC_CONFIG_CR + PCI_EXP_LNKCTL);
 	status |= (PCI_EXP_LNKCTL_LBMIE | PCI_EXP_LNKCTL_LABIE);
-	rockchip_pcie_write(rockchip, status, PCIE_RC_CONFIG_LCS);
+	rockchip_pcie_write(rockchip, status, PCIE_RC_CONFIG_CR + PCI_EXP_LNKCTL);
 }
 
 static void rockchip_pcie_clr_bw_int(struct rockchip_pcie *rockchip)
 {
 	u32 status;
 
-	status = rockchip_pcie_read(rockchip, PCIE_RC_CONFIG_LCS);
+	status = rockchip_pcie_read(rockchip, PCIE_RC_CONFIG_CR + PCI_EXP_LNKCTL);
 	status |= (PCI_EXP_LNKSTA_LBMS | PCI_EXP_LNKSTA_LABS) << 16;
-	rockchip_pcie_write(rockchip, status, PCIE_RC_CONFIG_LCS);
+	rockchip_pcie_write(rockchip, status, PCIE_RC_CONFIG_CR + PCI_EXP_LNKCTL);
 }
 
 static void rockchip_pcie_update_txcredit_mui(struct rockchip_pcie *rockchip)
@@ -269,7 +269,7 @@ static void rockchip_pcie_set_power_limit(struct rockchip_pcie *rockchip)
 	scale = 3; /* 0.001x */
 	curr = curr / 1000; /* convert to mA */
 	power = (curr * 3300) / 1000; /* milliwatt */
-	while (power > PCIE_RC_CONFIG_DCR_CSPL_LIMIT) {
+	while (power > FIELD_MAX(PCI_EXP_DEVCAP_PWR_VAL)) {
 		if (!scale) {
 			dev_warn(rockchip->dev, "invalid power supply\n");
 			return;
@@ -278,10 +278,10 @@ static void rockchip_pcie_set_power_limit(struct rockchip_pcie *rockchip)
 		power = power / 10;
 	}
 
-	status = rockchip_pcie_read(rockchip, PCIE_RC_CONFIG_DCR);
-	status |= (power << PCIE_RC_CONFIG_DCR_CSPL_SHIFT) |
-		  (scale << PCIE_RC_CONFIG_DCR_CPLS_SHIFT);
-	rockchip_pcie_write(rockchip, status, PCIE_RC_CONFIG_DCR);
+	status = rockchip_pcie_read(rockchip, PCIE_RC_CONFIG_CR + PCI_EXP_DEVCAP);
+	status |= FIELD_PREP(PCI_EXP_DEVCAP_PWR_VAL, power);
+	status |= FIELD_PREP(PCI_EXP_DEVCAP_PWR_SCL, scale);
+	rockchip_pcie_write(rockchip, status, PCIE_RC_CONFIG_CR + PCI_EXP_DEVCAP);
 }
 
 /**
@@ -309,14 +309,14 @@ static int rockchip_pcie_host_init_port(struct rockchip_pcie *rockchip)
 	rockchip_pcie_set_power_limit(rockchip);
 
 	/* Set RC's clock architecture as common clock */
-	status = rockchip_pcie_read(rockchip, PCIE_RC_CONFIG_LCS);
+	status = rockchip_pcie_read(rockchip, PCIE_RC_CONFIG_CR + PCI_EXP_LNKCTL);
 	status |= PCI_EXP_LNKSTA_SLC << 16;
-	rockchip_pcie_write(rockchip, status, PCIE_RC_CONFIG_LCS);
+	rockchip_pcie_write(rockchip, status, PCIE_RC_CONFIG_CR + PCI_EXP_LNKCTL);
 
 	/* Set RC's RCB to 128 */
-	status = rockchip_pcie_read(rockchip, PCIE_RC_CONFIG_LCS);
+	status = rockchip_pcie_read(rockchip, PCIE_RC_CONFIG_CR + PCI_EXP_LNKCTL);
 	status |= PCI_EXP_LNKCTL_RCB;
-	rockchip_pcie_write(rockchip, status, PCIE_RC_CONFIG_LCS);
+	rockchip_pcie_write(rockchip, status, PCIE_RC_CONFIG_CR + PCI_EXP_LNKCTL);
 
 	/* Enable Gen1 training */
 	rockchip_pcie_write(rockchip, PCIE_CLIENT_LINK_TRAIN_ENABLE,
@@ -341,9 +341,9 @@ static int rockchip_pcie_host_init_port(struct rockchip_pcie *rockchip)
 		 * Enable retrain for gen2. This should be configured only after
 		 * gen1 finished.
 		 */
-		status = rockchip_pcie_read(rockchip, PCIE_RC_CONFIG_LCS);
+		status = rockchip_pcie_read(rockchip, PCIE_RC_CONFIG_CR + PCI_EXP_LNKCTL);
 		status |= PCI_EXP_LNKCTL_RL;
-		rockchip_pcie_write(rockchip, status, PCIE_RC_CONFIG_LCS);
+		rockchip_pcie_write(rockchip, status, PCIE_RC_CONFIG_CR + PCI_EXP_LNKCTL);
 
 		err = readl_poll_timeout(rockchip->apb_base + PCIE_CORE_CTRL,
 					 status, PCIE_LINK_IS_GEN2(status), 20,
@@ -380,15 +380,15 @@ static int rockchip_pcie_host_init_port(struct rockchip_pcie *rockchip)
 
 	/* Clear L0s from RC's link cap */
 	if (of_property_read_bool(dev->of_node, "aspm-no-l0s")) {
-		status = rockchip_pcie_read(rockchip, PCIE_RC_CONFIG_LINK_CAP);
-		status &= ~PCIE_RC_CONFIG_LINK_CAP_L0S;
-		rockchip_pcie_write(rockchip, status, PCIE_RC_CONFIG_LINK_CAP);
+		status = rockchip_pcie_read(rockchip, PCIE_RC_CONFIG_CR + PCI_EXP_LNKCAP);
+		status &= ~PCI_EXP_LNKCAP_ASPM_L0S;
+		rockchip_pcie_write(rockchip, status, PCIE_RC_CONFIG_CR + PCI_EXP_LNKCAP);
 	}
 
-	status = rockchip_pcie_read(rockchip, PCIE_RC_CONFIG_DCSR);
-	status &= ~PCIE_RC_CONFIG_DCSR_MPS_MASK;
-	status |= PCIE_RC_CONFIG_DCSR_MPS_256;
-	rockchip_pcie_write(rockchip, status, PCIE_RC_CONFIG_DCSR);
+	status = rockchip_pcie_read(rockchip, PCIE_RC_CONFIG_CR + PCI_EXP_DEVCTL);
+	status &= ~PCI_EXP_DEVCTL_PAYLOAD;
+	status |= PCI_EXP_DEVCTL_PAYLOAD_256B;
+	rockchip_pcie_write(rockchip, status, PCIE_RC_CONFIG_CR + PCI_EXP_DEVCTL);
 
 	return 0;
 err_power_off_phy:
diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rockchip.h b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rockchip.h
index 5864a20323f2..f5cbf3c9d2d9 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rockchip.h
+++ b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rockchip.h
@@ -155,17 +155,7 @@
 #define PCIE_EP_CONFIG_DID_VID		(PCIE_EP_CONFIG_BASE + 0x00)
 #define PCIE_EP_CONFIG_LCS		(PCIE_EP_CONFIG_BASE + 0xd0)
 #define PCIE_RC_CONFIG_RID_CCR		(PCIE_RC_CONFIG_BASE + 0x08)
-#define PCIE_RC_CONFIG_DCR		(PCIE_RC_CONFIG_BASE + 0xc4)
-#define   PCIE_RC_CONFIG_DCR_CSPL_SHIFT		18
-#define   PCIE_RC_CONFIG_DCR_CSPL_LIMIT		0xff
-#define   PCIE_RC_CONFIG_DCR_CPLS_SHIFT		26
-#define PCIE_RC_CONFIG_DCSR		(PCIE_RC_CONFIG_BASE + 0xc8)
-#define   PCIE_RC_CONFIG_DCSR_MPS_MASK		GENMASK(7, 5)
-#define   PCIE_RC_CONFIG_DCSR_MPS_256		(0x1 << 5)
-#define PCIE_RC_CONFIG_LINK_CAP		(PCIE_RC_CONFIG_BASE + 0xcc)
-#define   PCIE_RC_CONFIG_LINK_CAP_L0S		BIT(10)
-#define PCIE_RC_CONFIG_LCS		(PCIE_RC_CONFIG_BASE + 0xd0)
-#define PCIE_EP_CONFIG_LCS		(PCIE_EP_CONFIG_BASE + 0xd0)
+#define PCIE_RC_CONFIG_CR		(PCIE_RC_CONFIG_BASE + 0xc0)
 #define PCIE_RC_CONFIG_L1_SUBSTATE_CTRL2 (PCIE_RC_CONFIG_BASE + 0x90c)
 #define PCIE_RC_CONFIG_THP_CAP		(PCIE_RC_CONFIG_BASE + 0x274)
 #define   PCIE_RC_CONFIG_THP_CAP_NEXT_MASK	GENMASK(31, 20)
-- 
2.49.0

[PATCH v7 2/4] PCI: rockchip: Set Target Link Speed before retraining

[Geraldo Nascimento]

Current code may fail 5.0GT/s retraining if Target Link Speed is set to
2.5 GT/s in Link Control and Status Register 2. Set it to 5.0 GT/s
accordingly.

Tested-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Geraldo Nascimento <geraldogabriel@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rockchip-host.c | 4 ++++
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rockchip-host.c b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rockchip-host.c
index 65653218b9ab..25890f6c0e17 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rockchip-host.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rockchip-host.c
@@ -341,6 +341,10 @@ static int rockchip_pcie_host_init_port(struct rockchip_pcie *rockchip)
 		 * Enable retrain for gen2. This should be configured only after
 		 * gen1 finished.
 		 */
+		status = rockchip_pcie_read(rockchip, PCIE_RC_CONFIG_CR + PCI_EXP_LNKCTL2);
+		status &= ~PCI_EXP_LNKCTL2_TLS;
+		status |= PCI_EXP_LNKCTL2_TLS_5_0GT;
+		rockchip_pcie_write(rockchip, status, PCIE_RC_CONFIG_CR + PCI_EXP_LNKCTL2);	
 		status = rockchip_pcie_read(rockchip, PCIE_RC_CONFIG_CR + PCI_EXP_LNKCTL);
 		status |= PCI_EXP_LNKCTL_RL;
 		rockchip_pcie_write(rockchip, status, PCIE_RC_CONFIG_CR + PCI_EXP_LNKCTL);
-- 
2.49.0

[PATCH v7 4/4] phy: rockchip-pcie: Properly disable TEST_WRITE strobe signal

[Geraldo Nascimento]

pcie_conf is used to touch TEST_WRITE strobe signal. This signal should
be enabled, a little time waited, and then disabled. Current code clearly
was copy-pasted and never disables the strobe signal. Adjust the define.
While at it, remove PHY_CFG_RD_MASK which has been unused since
64cdc0360811 ("phy: rockchip-pcie: remove unused phy_rd_cfg function").

Signed-off-by: Geraldo Nascimento <geraldogabriel@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-pcie.c | 3 +--
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-pcie.c b/drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-pcie.c
index f22ffb41cdc2..4e2dfd01adf2 100644
--- a/drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-pcie.c
+++ b/drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-pcie.c
@@ -30,9 +30,8 @@
 #define PHY_CFG_ADDR_SHIFT    1
 #define PHY_CFG_DATA_MASK     0xf
 #define PHY_CFG_ADDR_MASK     0x3f
-#define PHY_CFG_RD_MASK       0x3ff
 #define PHY_CFG_WR_ENABLE     1
-#define PHY_CFG_WR_DISABLE    1
+#define PHY_CFG_WR_DISABLE    0
 #define PHY_CFG_WR_SHIFT      0
 #define PHY_CFG_WR_MASK       1
 #define PHY_CFG_PLL_LOCK      0x10
-- 
2.49.0

[PATCH v7 3/4] phy: rockchip-pcie: Enable all four lanes if required

[Geraldo Nascimento]

Current code enables only Lane 0 because pwr_cnt will be incremented on
first call to the function. Let's reorder the enablement code to enable
all 4 lanes through GRF.

Signed-off-by: Geraldo Nascimento <geraldogabriel@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-pcie.c | 12 ++++++------
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-pcie.c b/drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-pcie.c
index bd44af36c67a..f22ffb41cdc2 100644
--- a/drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-pcie.c
+++ b/drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-pcie.c
@@ -160,6 +160,12 @@ static int rockchip_pcie_phy_power_on(struct phy *phy)
 
 	guard(mutex)(&rk_phy->pcie_mutex);
 
+	regmap_write(rk_phy->reg_base,
+		     rk_phy->phy_data->pcie_laneoff,
+		     HIWORD_UPDATE(!PHY_LANE_IDLE_OFF,
+				   PHY_LANE_IDLE_MASK,
+				   PHY_LANE_IDLE_A_SHIFT + inst->index));
+
 	if (rk_phy->pwr_cnt++) {
 		return 0;
 	}
@@ -176,12 +182,6 @@ static int rockchip_pcie_phy_power_on(struct phy *phy)
 				   PHY_CFG_ADDR_MASK,
 				   PHY_CFG_ADDR_SHIFT));
 
-	regmap_write(rk_phy->reg_base,
-		     rk_phy->phy_data->pcie_laneoff,
-		     HIWORD_UPDATE(!PHY_LANE_IDLE_OFF,
-				   PHY_LANE_IDLE_MASK,
-				   PHY_LANE_IDLE_A_SHIFT + inst->index));
-
 	/*
 	 * No documented timeout value for phy operation below,
 	 * so we make it large enough here. And we use loop-break
-- 
2.49.0

Re: [PATCH v7 4/4] phy: rockchip-pcie: Properly disable TEST_WRITE strobe signal

[neil.armstrong]

On 29/06/2025 14:48, Geraldo Nascimento wrote:
> pcie_conf is used to touch TEST_WRITE strobe signal. This signal should
> be enabled, a little time waited, and then disabled. Current code clearly
> was copy-pasted and never disables the strobe signal. Adjust the define.
> While at it, remove PHY_CFG_RD_MASK which has been unused since
> 64cdc0360811 ("phy: rockchip-pcie: remove unused phy_rd_cfg function").
> 
> Signed-off-by: Geraldo Nascimento <geraldogabriel@gmail.com>
> ---
>   drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-pcie.c | 3 +--
>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-pcie.c b/drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-pcie.c
> index f22ffb41cdc2..4e2dfd01adf2 100644
> --- a/drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-pcie.c
> +++ b/drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-pcie.c
> @@ -30,9 +30,8 @@
>   #define PHY_CFG_ADDR_SHIFT    1
>   #define PHY_CFG_DATA_MASK     0xf
>   #define PHY_CFG_ADDR_MASK     0x3f
> -#define PHY_CFG_RD_MASK       0x3ff
>   #define PHY_CFG_WR_ENABLE     1
> -#define PHY_CFG_WR_DISABLE    1
> +#define PHY_CFG_WR_DISABLE    0
>   #define PHY_CFG_WR_SHIFT      0
>   #define PHY_CFG_WR_MASK       1
>   #define PHY_CFG_PLL_LOCK      0x10

Reviewed-by: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@linaro.org>

Re: [PATCH v7 3/4] phy: rockchip-pcie: Enable all four lanes if required

[neil.armstrong]

On 29/06/2025 22:58, Geraldo Nascimento wrote:
> Current code enables only Lane 0 because pwr_cnt will be incremented on
> first call to the function. Let's reorder the enablement code to enable
> all 4 lanes through GRF.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Geraldo Nascimento <geraldogabriel@gmail.com>
> ---
>   drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-pcie.c | 12 ++++++------
>   1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-pcie.c b/drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-pcie.c
> index bd44af36c67a..f22ffb41cdc2 100644
> --- a/drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-pcie.c
> +++ b/drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-pcie.c
> @@ -160,6 +160,12 @@ static int rockchip_pcie_phy_power_on(struct phy *phy)
>   
>   	guard(mutex)(&rk_phy->pcie_mutex);
>   
> +	regmap_write(rk_phy->reg_base,
> +		     rk_phy->phy_data->pcie_laneoff,
> +		     HIWORD_UPDATE(!PHY_LANE_IDLE_OFF,
> +				   PHY_LANE_IDLE_MASK,
> +				   PHY_LANE_IDLE_A_SHIFT + inst->index));
> +
>   	if (rk_phy->pwr_cnt++) {
>   		return 0;
>   	}
> @@ -176,12 +182,6 @@ static int rockchip_pcie_phy_power_on(struct phy *phy)
>   				   PHY_CFG_ADDR_MASK,
>   				   PHY_CFG_ADDR_SHIFT));
>   
> -	regmap_write(rk_phy->reg_base,
> -		     rk_phy->phy_data->pcie_laneoff,
> -		     HIWORD_UPDATE(!PHY_LANE_IDLE_OFF,
> -				   PHY_LANE_IDLE_MASK,
> -				   PHY_LANE_IDLE_A_SHIFT + inst->index));
> -
>   	/*
>   	 * No documented timeout value for phy operation below,
>   	 * so we make it large enough here. And we use loop-break

Reviewed-by: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@linaro.org>

Re: [PATCH v7 3/4] phy: rockchip-pcie: Enable all four lanes if required

[Robin Murphy]

On 29/06/2025 9:58 pm, Geraldo Nascimento wrote:
> Current code enables only Lane 0 because pwr_cnt will be incremented on
> first call to the function. Let's reorder the enablement code to enable
> all 4 lanes through GRF.

As usual the TRM isn't very clear, but the way it describes the 
GRF_SOC_CON_5_PCIE bits does suggest they're driving external input 
signals of the phy block, so it seems reasonable that it could be OK to 
update the register itself without worrying about releasing the phy from 
reset first. In that case I'd agree this seems the cleanest fix, and if 
it works empirically then I think I'm now sufficiently convinced too;

Reviewed-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>

> Signed-off-by: Geraldo Nascimento <geraldogabriel@gmail.com>
> ---
>   drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-pcie.c | 12 ++++++------
>   1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-pcie.c b/drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-pcie.c
> index bd44af36c67a..f22ffb41cdc2 100644
> --- a/drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-pcie.c
> +++ b/drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-pcie.c
> @@ -160,6 +160,12 @@ static int rockchip_pcie_phy_power_on(struct phy *phy)
>   
>   	guard(mutex)(&rk_phy->pcie_mutex);
>   
> +	regmap_write(rk_phy->reg_base,
> +		     rk_phy->phy_data->pcie_laneoff,
> +		     HIWORD_UPDATE(!PHY_LANE_IDLE_OFF,
> +				   PHY_LANE_IDLE_MASK,
> +				   PHY_LANE_IDLE_A_SHIFT + inst->index));
> +
>   	if (rk_phy->pwr_cnt++) {
>   		return 0;
>   	}
> @@ -176,12 +182,6 @@ static int rockchip_pcie_phy_power_on(struct phy *phy)
>   				   PHY_CFG_ADDR_MASK,
>   				   PHY_CFG_ADDR_SHIFT));
>   
> -	regmap_write(rk_phy->reg_base,
> -		     rk_phy->phy_data->pcie_laneoff,
> -		     HIWORD_UPDATE(!PHY_LANE_IDLE_OFF,
> -				   PHY_LANE_IDLE_MASK,
> -				   PHY_LANE_IDLE_A_SHIFT + inst->index));
> -
>   	/*
>   	 * No documented timeout value for phy operation below,
>   	 * so we make it large enough here. And we use loop-break

Re: [PATCH v7 3/4] phy: rockchip-pcie: Enable all four lanes if required

[Geraldo Nascimento]

On Mon, Jun 30, 2025 at 02:48:25PM +0100, Robin Murphy wrote:
> On 29/06/2025 9:58 pm, Geraldo Nascimento wrote:
> > Current code enables only Lane 0 because pwr_cnt will be incremented on
> > first call to the function. Let's reorder the enablement code to enable
> > all 4 lanes through GRF.
> 
> As usual the TRM isn't very clear, but the way it describes the 
> GRF_SOC_CON_5_PCIE bits does suggest they're driving external input 
> signals of the phy block, so it seems reasonable that it could be OK to 
> update the register itself without worrying about releasing the phy from 
> reset first. In that case I'd agree this seems the cleanest fix, and if 
> it works empirically then I think I'm now sufficiently convinced too;
> 
> Reviewed-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>

Hi Robin and Neil,

Thank you both for the positive reviews and the effort.

I must admit however that it looks like this patch was lifted verbatim
from Armbian and I'm missing the Signed-off-by from the original author.

As Robin may attest, I initially started by blindingly enabling all
lanes which, of course, is no good. I tried a suggestion by Robin which
did not work, and eventually settled on this Armbian solution, which at
least has got some battle-testing.

I already contacted Valmintas Paliksa, the original author of the patch,
and asked permission to use his Signed-off-by. I'm aware I could probably
use the Signed-off-by without strict permission, but it does not feel
right to me.

Thanks,
Geraldo Nascimento

Re: [PATCH v7 3/4] phy: rockchip-pcie: Enable all four lanes if required

[Geraldo Nascimento]

On Mon, Jun 30, 2025 at 02:48:25PM +0100, Robin Murphy wrote:
> On 29/06/2025 9:58 pm, Geraldo Nascimento wrote:
> > Current code enables only Lane 0 because pwr_cnt will be incremented on
> > first call to the function. Let's reorder the enablement code to enable
> > all 4 lanes through GRF.
> 
> As usual the TRM isn't very clear, but the way it describes the 
> GRF_SOC_CON_5_PCIE bits does suggest they're driving external input 
> signals of the phy block, so it seems reasonable that it could be OK to 
> update the register itself without worrying about releasing the phy from 
> reset first. In that case I'd agree this seems the cleanest fix, and if 
> it works empirically then I think I'm now sufficiently convinced too;
> 
> Reviewed-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>

Hi everyone,

Patches 1 and 2 of this series were merged thhrough pci git but patches
3 and 4 of present series got R-b's but were completely ignored by phy
maintainers.

Do you think it's fair if I resend these ones with a new, phy only, cover
letter but keep the R-b tags?

Thank you,
Geraldo Nascimento