From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wm0-f67.google.com ([74.125.82.67]:35468 "EHLO mail-wm0-f67.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754923AbeCSKCg (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Mar 2018 06:02:36 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] PCI: rcar: Poll more often in rcar_pcie_wait_for_dl() To: Simon Horman Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, Marek Vasut , Geert Uytterhoeven , Phil Edworthy , Wolfram Sang , linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org References: <20180318105253.30532-1-marek.vasut+renesas@gmail.com> <20180319083839.h3qdt4obbsbqlx73@verge.net.au> From: Marek Vasut Message-ID: Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2018 10:53:45 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20180319083839.h3qdt4obbsbqlx73@verge.net.au> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Sender: linux-pci-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 03/19/2018 09:38 AM, Simon Horman wrote: > On Sun, Mar 18, 2018 at 11:52:52AM +0100, Marek Vasut wrote: >> The data link active signal usually takes ~20 uSec to be asserted, >> poll the bit more often to avoid useless delays in this function. >> >> Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut >> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven >> Cc: Phil Edworthy >> Cc: Simon Horman >> Cc: Wolfram Sang >> Cc: linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org > > Unless my eyes deceive me this seems to be quite a lot (100x) more often, > but so be it. It's just a higher frequency to avoid slowdown when bringing the link up. > Reviewed-by: Simon Horman > > >> --- >> drivers/pci/host/pcie-rcar.c | 4 ++-- >> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/pci/host/pcie-rcar.c b/drivers/pci/host/pcie-rcar.c >> index 93d59f15c589..099998f1923a 100644 >> --- a/drivers/pci/host/pcie-rcar.c >> +++ b/drivers/pci/host/pcie-rcar.c >> @@ -528,13 +528,13 @@ static void phy_write_reg(struct rcar_pcie *pcie, >> >> static int rcar_pcie_wait_for_dl(struct rcar_pcie *pcie) >> { >> - unsigned int timeout = 10; >> + unsigned int timeout = 10000; >> >> while (timeout--) { >> if ((rcar_pci_read_reg(pcie, PCIETSTR) & DATA_LINK_ACTIVE)) >> return 0; >> >> - msleep(5); >> + udelay(5); >> } >> >> return -ETIMEDOUT; >> -- >> 2.16.2 >> -- Best regards, Marek Vasut