public inbox for linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Ilpo Järvinen" <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
To: "Wassenberg, Dennis" <Dennis.Wassenberg@secunet.com>
Cc: "linux-pci@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
	 "kbusch@kernel.org" <kbusch@kernel.org>,
	 "mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com"
	<mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>,
	 "mpearson-lenovo@squebb.ca" <mpearson-lenovo@squebb.ca>,
	 Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>,
	 Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>
Subject: Re: UAF during boot on MTL based devices with attached dock
Date: Sat, 21 Sep 2024 12:08:02 +0300 (EEST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <c01f8f96-7a42-dd70-3a59-915f9f185929@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6de4b45ff2b32dd91a805ec02ec8ec73ef411bf6.camel@secunet.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3983 bytes --]

On Thu, 19 Sep 2024, Wassenberg, Dennis wrote:

> Hi together,
> 
> we are facing into issues which seems to be PCI related and asking for your estimations.
> 
> Background:
> We want to boot up an Intel MeteorLake based system (e.g. Lenovo ThinkPad X13 Gen5) with the Lenovo Thunderbolt 4
> universal dock attached during boot. On some devices it is nearly 100% reproducible that the boot will fail. Other
> systems will never show this issue (e.g. older devices based on RaptorLake or AlderLake platform).
> 
> We did some debugging on this and came to the conclusion that there is a use-after-free in pci_slot_release.
> The Thunderbolt 4 Dock will expose a PCI hierarchy at first and shortly after that, due to the device is inaccessible,
> it will release the additional buses/ports. This seems to end up in a race where pci_slot_release accesses &slot->bus
> which as already freed:
> 
> 0000:00 [root bus]
>       -> 0000:00:07.0 [bridge to 20-49]
>                      -> 0000:20:00.0 [bridge to 21-49]
>                                     -> 0000:21:00.0 [bridge to 22]
>                                        0000:21:01.0 [bridge to 23-2e]
>                                        0000:21:02.0 [bridge to 2f-3a]
>                                        0000:21:03.0 [bridge to 3b-48]
>                                        0000:21:04.0 [bridge to 49]
>          0000:00:07.2 [bridge to 50-79]
> 
> 
> We are currently running on kernel 6.8.12. Because this kernel is out of support I tried it on 6.11. This kernel shows
> exactly the same issue. I attached two log files:
> dmesg-ramoops-0: Based on kernel 6.11 with added kernel command line option "slab_debug" in order to force a kernel Oops
> while accessing freed memory.
> dmesg-ramoops-0-pci_dbg: This it like dmesg-ramoops-0 with additional kernel command line option '"dyndbg=file
> drivers/pci/* +p" ignore_loglevel' in order to give you more insight whats happening on the pci bus.
> 
> I would appreciate any kind of help on this.

Hi,

Thanks for the report.

Unfortunately I don't really know how this is supposed to work (what in 
which order) but the patch below might help to the immediate issue you 
hit. I'm a bit skeptical it's the _correct_ solution and I expect there's 
going to be just another spot that blows next.


[PATCH 1/1] PCI: Don't access freed bus in pci_slot_release()

Signed-off-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
---
 drivers/pci/remove.c |  2 ++
 drivers/pci/slot.c   | 18 ++++++++++--------
 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pci/remove.c b/drivers/pci/remove.c
index 910387e5bdbf..532604dd722c 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/remove.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/remove.c
@@ -97,6 +97,8 @@ static void pci_remove_bus_device(struct pci_dev *dev)
 
 		pci_remove_bus(bus);
 		dev->subordinate = NULL;
+		if (dev->slot && PCI_SLOT(dev->devfn) == dev->slot->number)
+			dev->slot->bus = NULL;
 	}
 
 	pci_destroy_dev(dev);
diff --git a/drivers/pci/slot.c b/drivers/pci/slot.c
index 0f87cade10f7..4bcc16d484dd 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/slot.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/slot.c
@@ -69,14 +69,16 @@ static void pci_slot_release(struct kobject *kobj)
 	struct pci_dev *dev;
 	struct pci_slot *slot = to_pci_slot(kobj);
 
-	dev_dbg(&slot->bus->dev, "dev %02x, released physical slot %s\n",
-		slot->number, pci_slot_name(slot));
-
-	down_read(&pci_bus_sem);
-	list_for_each_entry(dev, &slot->bus->devices, bus_list)
-		if (PCI_SLOT(dev->devfn) == slot->number)
-			dev->slot = NULL;
-	up_read(&pci_bus_sem);
+	if (slot->bus) {
+		dev_dbg(&slot->bus->dev, "dev %02x, released physical slot %s\n",
+			slot->number, pci_slot_name(slot));
+
+		down_read(&pci_bus_sem);
+		list_for_each_entry(dev, &slot->bus->devices, bus_list)
+			if (PCI_SLOT(dev->devfn) == slot->number)
+				dev->slot = NULL;
+		up_read(&pci_bus_sem);
+	}
 
 	list_del(&slot->list);
 
-- 
2.39.2

  reply	other threads:[~2024-09-21  9:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-09-19  8:06 UAF during boot on MTL based devices with attached dock Wassenberg, Dennis
2024-09-21  9:08 ` Ilpo Järvinen [this message]
2024-09-23  8:38   ` Wassenberg, Dennis
2024-09-23  4:41 ` mika.westerberg
2024-09-23  8:43   ` Wassenberg, Dennis
2024-09-23 11:17     ` mika.westerberg
2024-09-23 13:42       ` Wassenberg, Dennis
2024-09-23 12:23 ` Wassenberg, Dennis
2024-09-24 10:51   ` Ilpo Järvinen
2024-09-25 15:38     ` Wassenberg, Dennis
2024-09-26 13:58       ` Ilpo Järvinen
2024-10-07 16:34         ` Wassenberg, Dennis
2024-10-03 13:46       ` Lukas Wunner
2024-10-04  7:45         ` Lukas Wunner
2024-10-07 16:49           ` Wassenberg, Dennis
2024-10-08 13:58             ` Lukas Wunner
2024-10-08 16:37               ` mika.westerberg
2024-10-08 18:23                 ` Lukas Wunner
2024-10-09  4:44                   ` mika.westerberg
2024-10-09 11:47                     ` Lukas Wunner
2024-10-09 12:55                       ` mika.westerberg
2024-10-09  6:26               ` Wassenberg, Dennis
2024-10-07 16:20         ` Wassenberg, Dennis
2024-09-24  8:54 ` Lukas Wunner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=c01f8f96-7a42-dd70-3a59-915f9f185929@linux.intel.com \
    --to=ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=Dennis.Wassenberg@secunet.com \
    --cc=Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com \
    --cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lukas@wunner.de \
    --cc=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=mpearson-lenovo@squebb.ca \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox