From: Hans Zhang <18255117159@163.com>
To: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr>
Cc: bhelgaas@google.com, jonathanh@nvidia.com, kw@linux.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org, lpieralisi@kernel.org,
manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org, robh@kernel.org,
thierry.reding@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [v2] PCI: tegra194: Fix debugfs directory creation when CONFIG_PCIEASPM is disabled
Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2025 09:16:33 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c0582215-e09e-44f7-a225-7c255e26d29f@163.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c51bbf38-0c6a-418f-b1e2-763d621186ff@wanadoo.fr>
On 2025/4/7 02:10, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
> Le 06/04/2025 à 15:43, Hans Zhang a écrit :
>> Previously, the debugfs directory was unconditionally created in
>> tegra_pcie_config_rp() regardless of the CONFIG_PCIEASPM setting.
>> This led to unnecessary directory creation when ASPM support was
>> disabled.
>>
>> Move the debugfs directory creation into init_debugfs() which is
>> conditionally compiled based on CONFIG_PCIEASPM. This ensures:
>> - The directory is only created when ASPM-related debugfs entries are
>> needed.
>> - Proper error handling for directory creation failures.
>> - Avoids cluttering debugfs with empty directories when ASPM is disabled.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Hans Zhang <18255117159-9Onoh4P/yGk@public.gmane.org>
>> ---
>> Changes since v1:
>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pci/20250405145459.26800-1-18255117159-9Onoh4P/yGk@public.gmane.org
>>
>> - The first version was committed incorrectly because the judgment
>> parameter in "debugfs_remove_recursive" was not noticed.
>> ---
>> drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-tegra194.c | 27 +++++++++++++---------
>> 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-tegra194.c
>> b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-tegra194.c
>> index 5103995cd6c7..f048b2342af4 100644
>> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-tegra194.c
>> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-tegra194.c
>> @@ -711,16 +711,27 @@ static void init_host_aspm(struct tegra_pcie_dw
>> *pcie)
>> dw_pcie_writel_dbi(pci, PCIE_PORT_AFR, val);
>> }
>> -static void init_debugfs(struct tegra_pcie_dw *pcie)
>> +static int init_debugfs(struct tegra_pcie_dw *pcie)
>
> I would keep it a void function.
> If devm_kasprintf() fails, which is unlikely, then the module should
> still work correctly. So just a return; should be fine IMHO.
>
> Usually, errors related to debugfs are silently ignored as is does not
> prevent this to work.
>
Hi Christophe,
Thanks your for reply. Will change.
Best regards,
Hans
> CJ
>
>> {
>> - debugfs_create_devm_seqfile(pcie->dev, "aspm_state_cnt",
>> pcie->debugfs,
>> + struct device *dev = pcie->dev;
>> + char *name;
>> +
>> + name = devm_kasprintf(dev, GFP_KERNEL, "%pOFP", dev->of_node);
>> + if (!name)
>> + return -ENOMEM;
>> +
>> + pcie->debugfs = debugfs_create_dir(name, NULL);
>> +
>> + debugfs_create_devm_seqfile(dev, "aspm_state_cnt", pcie->debugfs,
>> aspm_state_cnt);
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> }
>> #else
>> static inline void disable_aspm_l12(struct tegra_pcie_dw *pcie) {
>> return; }
>> static inline void disable_aspm_l11(struct tegra_pcie_dw *pcie) {
>> return; }
>> static inline void init_host_aspm(struct tegra_pcie_dw *pcie) {
>> return; }
>> -static inline void init_debugfs(struct tegra_pcie_dw *pcie) { return; }
>> +static inline int init_debugfs(struct tegra_pcie_dw *pcie) { return 0; }
>> #endif
>> static void tegra_pcie_enable_system_interrupts(struct dw_pcie_rp *pp)
>> @@ -1634,7 +1645,6 @@ static void tegra_pcie_deinit_controller(struct
>> tegra_pcie_dw *pcie)
>> static int tegra_pcie_config_rp(struct tegra_pcie_dw *pcie)
>> {
>> struct device *dev = pcie->dev;
>> - char *name;
>> int ret;
>> pm_runtime_enable(dev);
>> @@ -1664,14 +1674,9 @@ static int tegra_pcie_config_rp(struct
>> tegra_pcie_dw *pcie)
>> goto fail_host_init;
>> }
>> - name = devm_kasprintf(dev, GFP_KERNEL, "%pOFP", dev->of_node);
>> - if (!name) {
>> - ret = -ENOMEM;
>> + ret = init_debugfs(pcie);
>> + if (ret < 0)
>> goto fail_host_init;
>> - }
>> -
>> - pcie->debugfs = debugfs_create_dir(name, NULL);
>> - init_debugfs(pcie);
>> return ret;
>>
>> base-commit: a8662bcd2ff152bfbc751cab20f33053d74d0963
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-07 1:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-06 13:43 [v2] PCI: tegra194: Fix debugfs directory creation when CONFIG_PCIEASPM is disabled Hans Zhang
2025-04-06 18:10 ` Christophe JAILLET
2025-04-07 1:16 ` Hans Zhang [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c0582215-e09e-44f7-a225-7c255e26d29f@163.com \
--to=18255117159@163.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr \
--cc=jonathanh@nvidia.com \
--cc=kw@linux.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
--cc=manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox