Re: [PATCH v1 6/8] PCI: brcmstb: Don't conflate the reset rescal with phy ctrl

[Stanimir Varbanov <svarbanov@suse.de>]

On 6/28/24 23:54, Jim Quinlan wrote:
> We've been assuming that if an SOC has a "rescal" reset controller that we
> should automatically invoke brcm_phy_cntl(...).  This will not be true in
> future SOCs, so we create a bool "has_phy" and adjust the cfg_data
> appropriately (we need to give 7216 its own cfg_data structure instead of
> sharing one).
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jim Quinlan <james.quinlan@broadcom.com>
> ---
>  drivers/pci/controller/pcie-brcmstb.c | 17 ++++++++++++++---
>  1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-brcmstb.c b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-brcmstb.c
> index 4e0848e1311f..e740e2966a5c 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-brcmstb.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-brcmstb.c
> @@ -227,6 +227,7 @@ enum pcie_type {
>  struct pcie_cfg_data {
>  	const int *offsets;
>  	const enum pcie_type type;
> +	const bool has_phy;
>  	void (*perst_set)(struct brcm_pcie *pcie, u32 val);
>  	void (*bridge_sw_init_set)(struct brcm_pcie *pcie, u32 val);
>  };
> @@ -277,6 +278,7 @@ struct brcm_pcie {
>  	void			(*bridge_sw_init_set)(struct brcm_pcie *pcie, u32 val);
>  	struct subdev_regulators *sr;
>  	bool			ep_wakeup_capable;
> +	bool			has_phy;
>  };
>  
>  static inline bool is_bmips(const struct brcm_pcie *pcie)
> @@ -1316,12 +1318,12 @@ static int brcm_phy_cntl(struct brcm_pcie *pcie, const int start)
>  
>  static inline int brcm_phy_start(struct brcm_pcie *pcie)
>  {
> -	return pcie->rescal ? brcm_phy_cntl(pcie, 1) : 0;
> +	return pcie->has_phy ? brcm_phy_cntl(pcie, 1) : 0;
>  }
>  
>  static inline int brcm_phy_stop(struct brcm_pcie *pcie)
>  {
> -	return pcie->rescal ? brcm_phy_cntl(pcie, 0) : 0;
> +	return pcie->has_phy ? brcm_phy_cntl(pcie, 0) : 0;
>  }
>  
>  static void brcm_pcie_turn_off(struct brcm_pcie *pcie)
> @@ -1564,12 +1566,20 @@ static const struct pcie_cfg_data bcm2711_cfg = {
>  	.bridge_sw_init_set = brcm_pcie_bridge_sw_init_set_generic,
>  };
>  
> +static const struct pcie_cfg_data bcm7216_cfg = {
> +	.offsets	= pcie_offset_bcm7278,
> +	.type		= BCM7278,

This "type" field is confusing, maybe it would be good to rename it to
"family"? For example BCM72XX family.

> +	.perst_set	= brcm_pcie_perst_set_7278,
> +	.bridge_sw_init_set = brcm_pcie_bridge_sw_init_set_7278,
> +	.has_phy	= true,
> +};
> +
>  static const struct of_device_id brcm_pcie_match[] = {
>  	{ .compatible = "brcm,bcm2711-pcie", .data = &bcm2711_cfg },
>  	{ .compatible = "brcm,bcm4908-pcie", .data = &bcm4908_cfg },
>  	{ .compatible = "brcm,bcm7211-pcie", .data = &generic_cfg },
>  	{ .compatible = "brcm,bcm7278-pcie", .data = &bcm7278_cfg },
> -	{ .compatible = "brcm,bcm7216-pcie", .data = &bcm7278_cfg },
> +	{ .compatible = "brcm,bcm7216-pcie", .data = &bcm7216_cfg },
>  	{ .compatible = "brcm,bcm7445-pcie", .data = &generic_cfg },
>  	{ .compatible = "brcm,bcm7435-pcie", .data = &bcm7435_cfg },
>  	{ .compatible = "brcm,bcm7425-pcie", .data = &bcm7425_cfg },
> @@ -1617,6 +1627,7 @@ static int brcm_pcie_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	pcie->type = data->type;
>  	pcie->perst_set = data->perst_set;
>  	pcie->bridge_sw_init_set = data->bridge_sw_init_set;
> +	pcie->has_phy = data->has_phy;
>  
>  	pcie->base = devm_platform_ioremap_resource(pdev, 0);
>  	if (IS_ERR(pcie->base))

~Stan