From: "Ilpo Järvinen" <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
To: Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>
Cc: Stefan Wahren <wahrenst@gmx.net>,
Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@broadcom.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] PCI/PME+pciehp: Request IRQF_ONESHOT because bwctrl shares IRQ
Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2024 18:27:34 +0200 (EET) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ca3008f1-d4ba-a68e-5a3c-a9e2e075eaa0@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZzdF1zrgQNNRlkgP@wunner.de>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1790 bytes --]
On Fri, 15 Nov 2024, Lukas Wunner wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 14, 2024 at 04:20:34PM +0200, Ilpo Järvinen wrote:
> > --- a/drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_hpc.c
> > +++ b/drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_hpc.c
> > @@ -68,7 +68,8 @@ static inline int pciehp_request_irq(struct controller *ctrl)
> >
> > /* Installs the interrupt handler */
> > retval = request_threaded_irq(irq, pciehp_isr, pciehp_ist,
> > - IRQF_SHARED, "pciehp", ctrl);
> > + IRQF_SHARED | IRQF_ONESHOT,
> > + "pciehp", ctrl);
> > if (retval)
> > ctrl_err(ctrl, "Cannot get irq %d for the hotplug controller\n",
> > irq);
>
> I don't think this will work. The IRQ thread pciehp_ist() may write
> to the Slot Control register and await a Command Completed event,
> e.g. when turning Slot Power on/off, changing LEDs, etc.
>
> What happens then is, the hardware sets the Command Completed bit in
> the Slot Status register and signals an interrupt. The hardirq handler
> pciehp_isr() reads the Slot Status register, acknowledges the
> Command Completed event, sets "ctrl->cmd_busy = 0" and wakes up the
> waiting IRQ thread.
>
> In other words, pciehp does need the interrupt to stay enabled while
> the IRQ thread is running so that the hardirq handler can receive
> Command Completed interrupts.
>
> Note that DPC also does not use IRQF_ONESHOT, so you'd have to change
> that as well in this patch. The Raspberry Pi happens to not support
> DPC, so Stefan didn't see an error related to it.
>
> I'm afraid you need to amend bwctrl to work without IRQF_ONESHOT rather
> than changing all the others.
That isn't complicated. The current irq thread handler is simple enough
that it will just work as hardirq handler without any changes.
--
i.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-11-15 16:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-11-14 14:20 [PATCH 1/1] PCI/PME+pciehp: Request IRQF_ONESHOT because bwctrl shares IRQ Ilpo Järvinen
2024-11-15 7:07 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2024-11-15 12:29 ` Stefan Wahren
2024-11-15 13:00 ` Lukas Wunner
2024-11-15 16:27 ` Ilpo Järvinen [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ca3008f1-d4ba-a68e-5a3c-a9e2e075eaa0@linux.intel.com \
--to=ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=florian.fainelli@broadcom.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lukas@wunner.de \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=wahrenst@gmx.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox