From: Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>
To: Smita Koralahalli <Smita.KoralahalliChannabasappa@amd.com>,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
oohall@gmail.com, Mahesh J Salgaonkar <mahesh@linux.ibm.com>,
Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>,
Yazen Ghannam <yazen.ghannam@amd.com>,
Fontenot Nathan <Nathan.Fontenot@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] PCI: pciehp: Add support for OS-First Hotplug and AER/DPC
Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2022 11:12:34 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <cabb5fa2-d1ba-581c-8ccb-79ca8188962a@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221101000719.36828-2-Smita.KoralahalliChannabasappa@amd.com>
Hi,
On 10/31/22 5:07 PM, Smita Koralahalli wrote:
> Current systems support Firmware-First model for hot-plug. In this model,
> firmware holds the responsibilty for executing the HW sequencing actions on
> an async or surprise add and removal events. Additionally, according to
> Section 6.7.6 of PCIe Base Specification [1], firmware must also handle
> the side-effects (DPC/AER events) reported on an async removal and is
> abstract to the OS.
I don't see anything about hotplug firmware-first info in the above
specification reference and I don't think firmware first logic exists for
hotplug. Are you referring to AER/DPC firmware handling support?
>
> This model however, poses issues while rolling out updates or fixing bugs
> as the servers need to be brought down for firmware updates. Hence,
> introduce support for OS-First hot-plug and AER/DPC. Here, OS is
> responsible for handling async add and remove along with handling of
> AER/DPC events which are generated as a side-effect of async remove.
I think for OS handling we use "native" term. So use it instead of "OS-First".
>
> The implementation is as follows: On an async remove a DPC is triggered as
> a side-effect along with an MSI to the OS. Determine it's an async remove
> by checking for DPC Trigger Status in DPC Status Register and Surprise
> Down Error Status in AER Uncorrected Error Status to be non-zero. If true,
> treat the DPC event as a side-effect of async remove, clear the error
> status registers and continue with hot-plug tear down routines. If not,
> follow the existing routine to handle AER/DPC errors.
I am wondering why your recovery fails below? Even if the device is disconnected,
error report handler will return PCI_ERS_RESULT_NEED_RESET and then attempt to do
reset using report_slot_reset(). This should work for your case, right?
>
> Dmesg before:
>
> pcieport 0000:00:01.4: DPC: containment event, status:0x1f01 source:0x0000
> pcieport 0000:00:01.4: DPC: unmasked uncorrectable error detected
> pcieport 0000:00:01.4: PCIe Bus Error: severity=Uncorrected (Fatal), type=Transaction Layer, (Receiver ID)
> pcieport 0000:00:01.4: device [1022:14ab] error status/mask=00000020/04004000
> pcieport 0000:00:01.4: [ 5] SDES (First)
> nvme nvme2: frozen state error detected, reset controller
> pcieport 0000:00:01.4: DPC: Data Link Layer Link Active not set in 1000 msec
> pcieport 0000:00:01.4: AER: subordinate device reset failed
> pcieport 0000:00:01.4: AER: device recovery failed
> pcieport 0000:00:01.4: pciehp: Slot(16): Link Down
> nvme2n1: detected capacity change from 1953525168 to 0
> pci 0000:04:00.0: Removing from iommu group 49
>
> Dmesg after:
>
> pcieport 0000:00:01.4: pciehp: Slot(16): Link Down
> nvme1n1: detected capacity change from 1953525168 to 0
> pci 0000:04:00.0: Removing from iommu group 37
> pcieport 0000:00:01.4: pciehp: Slot(16): Card present
> pci 0000:04:00.0: [8086:0a54] type 00 class 0x010802
> pci 0000:04:00.0: reg 0x10: [mem 0x00000000-0x00003fff 64bit]
> pci 0000:04:00.0: Max Payload Size set to 512 (was 128, max 512)
> pci 0000:04:00.0: enabling Extended Tags
> pci 0000:04:00.0: Adding to iommu group 37
> pci 0000:04:00.0: BAR 0: assigned [mem 0xf2400000-0xf2403fff 64bit]
> pcieport 0000:00:01.4: PCI bridge to [bus 04]
> pcieport 0000:00:01.4: bridge window [io 0x1000-0x1fff]
> pcieport 0000:00:01.4: bridge window [mem 0xf2400000-0xf24fffff]
> pcieport 0000:00:01.4: bridge window [mem 0x20080800000-0x200809fffff 64bit pref]
> nvme nvme1: pci function 0000:04:00.0
> nvme 0000:04:00.0: enabling device (0000 -> 0002)
> nvme nvme1: 128/0/0 default/read/poll queues
>
> [1] PCI Express Base Specification Revision 6.0, Dec 16 2021.
> https://members.pcisig.com/wg/PCI-SIG/document/16609
>
> Signed-off-by: Smita Koralahalli <Smita.KoralahalliChannabasappa@amd.com>
> ---
> drivers/pci/pcie/dpc.c | 61 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 61 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pcie/dpc.c b/drivers/pci/pcie/dpc.c
> index f5ffea17c7f8..e422876f51ad 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/pcie/dpc.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/pcie/dpc.c
> @@ -293,10 +293,71 @@ void dpc_process_error(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> }
> }
>
> +static void pci_clear_surpdn_errors(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> +{
> + u16 reg16;
> + u32 reg32;
> +
> + pci_read_config_dword(pdev, pdev->dpc_cap + PCI_EXP_DPC_RP_PIO_STATUS, ®32);
> + pci_write_config_dword(pdev, pdev->dpc_cap + PCI_EXP_DPC_RP_PIO_STATUS, reg32);
> +
> + pci_read_config_word(pdev, PCI_STATUS, ®16);
> + pci_write_config_word(pdev, PCI_STATUS, reg16);
> +
> + pcie_capability_read_word(pdev, PCI_EXP_DEVSTA, ®16);
> + pcie_capability_write_word(pdev, PCI_EXP_DEVSTA, reg16);
> +}
> +
> +static void pciehp_handle_surprise_removal(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> +{
> + if (pdev->dpc_rp_extensions && dpc_wait_rp_inactive(pdev))
> + return;
> +
> + /*
> + * According to Section 6.7.6 of the PCIe Base Spec 6.0, since async
> + * removal might be unexpected, errors might be reported as a side
> + * effect of the event and software should handle them as an expected
> + * part of this event.
> + */
> + pci_aer_raw_clear_status(pdev);
> + pci_clear_surpdn_errors(pdev);
> +
> + /*
> + * According to Section 6.13 and 6.15 of the PCIe Base Spec 6.0,
> + * following a hot-plug event, clear the ARI Forwarding Enable bit
> + * and AtomicOp Requester Enable as its not determined whether the
> + * next device inserted will support these capabilities. AtomicOp
> + * capabilities are not supported on PCI Express to PCI/PCI-X Bridges
> + * and any newly added component may not be an ARI device.
> + */
> + pcie_capability_clear_word(pdev, PCI_EXP_DEVCTL2,
> + (PCI_EXP_DEVCTL2_ARI | PCI_EXP_DEVCTL2_ATOMIC_REQ));
> +
> + pci_write_config_word(pdev, pdev->dpc_cap + PCI_EXP_DPC_STATUS,
> + PCI_EXP_DPC_STATUS_TRIGGER);
> +}
> +
> +static bool pciehp_is_surprise_removal(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> +{
> + u16 status;
> +
> + pci_read_config_word(pdev, pdev->aer_cap + PCI_ERR_UNCOR_STATUS, &status);
> +
> + if (!(status & PCI_ERR_UNC_SURPDN))
> + return false;
> +
> + pciehp_handle_surprise_removal(pdev);
> +
> + return true;
> +}
> +
> static irqreturn_t dpc_handler(int irq, void *context)
> {
> struct pci_dev *pdev = context;
>
> + if (pciehp_is_surprise_removal(pdev))
> + return IRQ_HANDLED;
> +
> dpc_process_error(pdev);
>
> /* We configure DPC so it only triggers on ERR_FATAL */
--
Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy
Linux Kernel Developer
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-11-09 19:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-11-01 0:07 [PATCH 0/2] PCI: pciehp: Add support for OS-First Hotplug Smita Koralahalli
2022-11-01 0:07 ` [PATCH 1/2] PCI: pciehp: Add support for OS-First Hotplug and AER/DPC Smita Koralahalli
2022-11-02 23:21 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2023-02-14 9:31 ` Smita Koralahalli
2022-11-04 10:15 ` Lukas Wunner
2023-02-14 9:33 ` Smita Koralahalli
2023-03-14 19:31 ` Smita Koralahalli
2023-05-10 20:19 ` Lukas Wunner
2023-05-11 15:23 ` Lukas Wunner
2023-05-15 19:20 ` Smita Koralahalli
2023-05-15 19:38 ` Lukas Wunner
2023-05-15 20:56 ` Smita Koralahalli
2023-05-16 10:14 ` Lukas Wunner
2022-11-09 19:12 ` Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy [this message]
2023-02-14 9:34 ` Smita Koralahalli
2022-11-01 0:07 ` [PATCH 2/2] PCI:pciehp: Clear 10-bit tags unconditionally on a hot-plug event Smita Koralahalli
2022-11-02 23:12 ` Bjorn Helgaas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=cabb5fa2-d1ba-581c-8ccb-79ca8188962a@linux.intel.com \
--to=sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com \
--cc=Nathan.Fontenot@amd.com \
--cc=Smita.KoralahalliChannabasappa@amd.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lukas@wunner.de \
--cc=mahesh@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=oohall@gmail.com \
--cc=yazen.ghannam@amd.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).