From: poza@codeaurora.org
To: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
Cc: Keith Busch <keith.busch@intel.com>,
Linux PCI <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org>,
linux-pci-owner@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 2/7] PCI/DPC: Fix PCI legacy interrupt acknowledgement
Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2018 11:03:22 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ce4d5c59dd5106350a750e656ddbc3c3@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180403203847.GO9322@bhelgaas-glaptop.roam.corp.google.com>
On 2018-04-04 02:08, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> [+cc Thomas, Rafael]
>
> On Mon, Apr 02, 2018 at 10:21:58AM -0600, Keith Busch wrote:
>> From: Oza Pawandeep <poza@codeaurora.org>
>>
>> The DPC driver was acknowledging the DPC interrupt status in deferred
>> work. That works for edge triggered interrupts, but causes an
>> interrupt
>> storm with level triggered legacy interrupts.
>>
>> This patch fixes that by clearing the interrupt status in interrupt
>> handler.
>
> I'm fuzzy on this question of edge vs. level and where the interrupt
> should be cleared. I'd like to understand this better and include the
> general rule in the changelog in case I'm not the only one who is
> unclear on this.
>
> Here's my understanding, gleaned from kernel/irq/chip.c and
> https://notes.shichao.io/lkd/ch7/ :
>
> The generic IRQ handling code ensures that an interrupt handler runs
> with its interrupt masked or disabled. If the interrupt is
> level-triggered, the interrupt handler must tell its device to stop
> asserting the interrupt before returning. If it doesn't, we will
> immediately take the interrupt again when the handler returns and
> the generic code unmasks the interrupt.
>
> The driver doesn't know whether its interrupt is edge- or
> level-triggered, so it must clear its interrupt source directly in
> its interrupt handler.
>
> I'd also like to convince myself that we don't have similar issues
> with other services, e.g., AER, PME, pciehp. Here are my notes about
> those:
>
> 1) pciehp:
> request_irq(irq, pcie_isr, ...)
> pcie_isr
> pciehp_isr
> # clear Slot Status event bits
> pcie_capability_read_word(pdev, PCI_EXP_SLTSTA, &status);
> events = status & (...)
> pcie_capability_write_word(pdev, PCI_EXP_SLTSTA, events);
>
> 2) AER:
> request_irq(dev->irq, aer_irq, ...)
> aer_irq
> # clear AER Root Error Status bits
> pci_read_config_dword(pdev->port, pos + PCI_ERR_ROOT_STATUS,
> &status);
> pci_write_config_dword(pdev->port, pos + PCI_ERR_ROOT_STATUS,
> status);
>
> 3) DPC:
> devm_request_irq(..., dev->irq, dpc_irq, ...)
> dpc_irq
> schedule_work(<dpc_work>)
> ...
> dpc_work
> # clear DPC Interrupt Status
> pci_write_config_word(pdev, cap + PCI_EXP_DPC_STATUS,
> PCI_EXP_DPC_STATUS_INTERRUPT);
>
> 4) PME:
> request_irq(srv->irq, pcie_pme_irq, ...)
> pcie_pme_irq
> pcie_pme_interrupt_enable(port, false);
> # clear PME Interrupt Enable
> pcie_capability_clear_word(dev, PCI_EXP_RTCTL, PCI_EXP_RTCTL_PMEIE);
> schedule_work(<pcie_pme_work_fn>)
> ...
> pcie_pme_work_fn
> # clear PME Status
> pcie_capability_set_dword(dev, PCI_EXP_RTSTA, PCI_EXP_RTSTA_PME);
> pcie_pme_interrupt_enable(port, true);
> # set PME Interrupt Enable
> pcie_capability_set_word(dev, PCI_EXP_RTCTL,
> PCI_EXP_RTCTL_PMEIE);
>
> The pciehp and AER cases look OK to me. DPC looks definitely wrong,
> and this patch should fix it.
>
> I *guess* PME looks OK, although I would feel better about it if it
> used the same strategy as the others. All of these things have both
> "Interrupt Enable" and "Interrupt Status" bits. PME is the only one
> that twiddles the Interrupt Enable in the interrupt path.
>
> Bottom line, I think this patch is fine and I applied it with the
> following changelog:
>
> PCI/DPC: Clear interrupt status in interrupt handler top half
>
> The generic IRQ handling code ensures that an interrupt handler runs
> with
> its interrupt masked or disabled. If the interrupt is
> level-triggered, the
> interrupt handler must tell its device to stop asserting the
> interrupt
> before returning. If it doesn't, we will immediately take the
> interrupt
> again when the handler returns and the generic code unmasks the
> interrupt.
>
> The driver doesn't know whether its interrupt is edge- or
> level-triggered,
> so it must clear its interrupt source directly in its interrupt
> handler.
>
> Previously we cleared the DPC interrupt status in the bottom half,
> i.e., in
> deferred work, which can cause an interrupt storm if the DPC
> interrupt
> happens to be level-triggered, e.g., if we're using INTx instead of
> MSI.
>
> Clear the DPC interrupt status bit in the interrupt handler, not in
> the
> deferred work.
>
> Signed-off-by: Oza Pawandeep <poza@codeaurora.org>
> Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
> [bhelgaas: changelog]
> Reviewed-by: Keith Busch <keith.busch@intel.com>
>
>
>> Signed-off-by: Oza Pawandeep <poza@codeaurora.org>
>> [changelog]
>> Reviewed-by: Keith Busch <keith.busch@intel.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/pci/pcie/pcie-dpc.c | 5 ++++-
>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pcie/pcie-dpc.c b/drivers/pci/pcie/pcie-dpc.c
>> index a9be6938417f..82644245cb4d 100644
>> --- a/drivers/pci/pcie/pcie-dpc.c
>> +++ b/drivers/pci/pcie/pcie-dpc.c
>> @@ -112,7 +112,7 @@ static void dpc_work(struct work_struct *work)
>> }
>>
>> pci_write_config_word(pdev, cap + PCI_EXP_DPC_STATUS,
>> - PCI_EXP_DPC_STATUS_TRIGGER | PCI_EXP_DPC_STATUS_INTERRUPT);
>> + PCI_EXP_DPC_STATUS_TRIGGER);
>>
>> pci_read_config_word(pdev, cap + PCI_EXP_DPC_CTL, &ctl);
>> pci_write_config_word(pdev, cap + PCI_EXP_DPC_CTL,
>> @@ -222,6 +222,9 @@ static irqreturn_t dpc_irq(int irq, void *context)
>> if (dpc->rp_extensions && reason == 3 && ext_reason == 0)
>> dpc_process_rp_pio_error(dpc);
>>
>> + pci_write_config_word(pdev, cap + PCI_EXP_DPC_STATUS,
>> + PCI_EXP_DPC_STATUS_INTERRUPT);
>> +
>> schedule_work(&dpc->work);
>>
>> return IRQ_HANDLED;
>> --
>> 2.14.3
>>
Hi Bjorn,
Is this change left out in 4.17 for some reason ?
Regards,
Oza.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-04-26 5:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-04-02 16:21 [PATCHv2 0/7] DPC updates Keith Busch
2018-04-02 16:21 ` [PATCHv2 1/7] PCI/DPC: Enable ERR_COR Keith Busch
2018-04-02 21:23 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2018-04-02 23:09 ` Keith Busch
2018-04-03 14:16 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2018-04-03 14:31 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-04-03 14:37 ` Keith Busch
2018-04-02 16:21 ` [PATCHv2 2/7] PCI/DPC: Fix PCI legacy interrupt acknowledgement Keith Busch
2018-04-03 20:38 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2018-04-03 23:04 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2018-04-04 8:13 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-04-04 8:38 ` Lukas Wunner
2018-04-26 5:33 ` poza [this message]
2018-05-16 15:16 ` Timur Tabi
2018-05-16 21:04 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2018-04-02 16:21 ` [PATCHv2 3/7] PCI/DPC: Leave interrupts enabled while handling event Keith Busch
2018-04-02 16:22 ` [PATCHv2 4/7] PCI/DPC: Defer event handling to work queue Keith Busch
2018-04-02 16:22 ` [PATCHv2 5/7] PCI/DPC: Remove rp_pio_status from dpc struct Keith Busch
2018-04-02 16:22 ` [PATCHv2 6/7] PCI/AER: API for obtaining AER information Keith Busch
2018-04-09 10:03 ` David Laight
2018-04-09 14:37 ` Keith Busch
2018-04-02 16:22 ` [PATCHv2 7/7] PCI/DPC: Print AER status in DPC event handling Keith Busch
2018-05-17 15:02 ` poza
2018-05-17 15:04 ` poza
2018-06-19 21:31 ` [PATCHv2 0/7] DPC updates Bjorn Helgaas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ce4d5c59dd5106350a750e656ddbc3c3@codeaurora.org \
--to=poza@codeaurora.org \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
--cc=keith.busch@intel.com \
--cc=linux-pci-owner@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=okaya@codeaurora.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).