linux-pci.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Josef Johansson <josef@oderland.se>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com, helgaas@kernel.org, jgross@suse.com,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, maz@kernel.org,
	xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org,
	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
	Jason Andryuk <jandryuk@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI/MSI: Move non-mask check back into low level accessors
Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2021 11:54:19 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <d1cc20aa-5c5c-6c7b-2e5d-bc31362ad891@oderland.se> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87cznqg5k8.ffs@tglx>

On 10/27/21 11:50, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> The recent rework of PCI/MSI[X] masking moved the non-mask checks from the
> low level accessors into the higher level mask/unmask functions.
>
> This missed the fact that these accessors can be invoked from other places
> as well. The missing checks break XEN-PV which sets pci_msi_ignore_mask and
> also violates the virtual MSIX and the msi_attrib.maskbit protections.
>
> Instead of sprinkling checks all over the place, lift them back into the
> low level accessor functions. To avoid checking three different conditions
> combine them into one property of msi_desc::msi_attrib.
>
> Reported-by: Josef Johansson <josef@oderland.se>
> Fixes: fcacdfbef5a1 ("PCI/MSI: Provide a new set of mask and unmask functions")
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> Cc: Jason Andryuk <jandryuk@gmail.com>
> Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
> Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
> Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>
> Cc: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
> Cc: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>
> Cc: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
> ---
>  drivers/pci/msi.c   |   26 ++++++++++++++------------
>  include/linux/msi.h |    2 +-
>  2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>
> --- a/drivers/pci/msi.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/msi.c
> @@ -148,6 +148,9 @@ static noinline void pci_msi_update_mask
>  	raw_spinlock_t *lock = &desc->dev->msi_lock;
>  	unsigned long flags;
>  
> +	if (!desc->msi_attrib.can_mask)
> +		return;
> +
>  	raw_spin_lock_irqsave(lock, flags);
>  	desc->msi_mask &= ~clear;
>  	desc->msi_mask |= set;
> @@ -181,7 +184,8 @@ static void pci_msix_write_vector_ctrl(s
>  {
>  	void __iomem *desc_addr = pci_msix_desc_addr(desc);
>  
> -	writel(ctrl, desc_addr + PCI_MSIX_ENTRY_VECTOR_CTRL);
> +	if (desc->msi_attrib.can_mask)
> +		writel(ctrl, desc_addr + PCI_MSIX_ENTRY_VECTOR_CTRL);
>  }
>  
>  static inline void pci_msix_mask(struct msi_desc *desc)
> @@ -200,23 +204,17 @@ static inline void pci_msix_unmask(struc
>  
>  static void __pci_msi_mask_desc(struct msi_desc *desc, u32 mask)
>  {
> -	if (pci_msi_ignore_mask || desc->msi_attrib.is_virtual)
> -		return;
> -
>  	if (desc->msi_attrib.is_msix)
>  		pci_msix_mask(desc);
> -	else if (desc->msi_attrib.maskbit)
> +	else
>  		pci_msi_mask(desc, mask);
>  }
>  
>  static void __pci_msi_unmask_desc(struct msi_desc *desc, u32 mask)
>  {
> -	if (pci_msi_ignore_mask || desc->msi_attrib.is_virtual)
> -		return;
> -
>  	if (desc->msi_attrib.is_msix)
>  		pci_msix_unmask(desc);
> -	else if (desc->msi_attrib.maskbit)
> +	else
>  		pci_msi_unmask(desc, mask);
>  }
>  
> @@ -484,7 +482,8 @@ msi_setup_entry(struct pci_dev *dev, int
>  	entry->msi_attrib.is_64		= !!(control & PCI_MSI_FLAGS_64BIT);
>  	entry->msi_attrib.is_virtual    = 0;
>  	entry->msi_attrib.entry_nr	= 0;
> -	entry->msi_attrib.maskbit	= !!(control & PCI_MSI_FLAGS_MASKBIT);
> +	entry->msi_attrib.can_mask	= !pci_msi_ignore_mask &&
> +					  !!(control & PCI_MSI_FLAGS_MASKBIT);
>  	entry->msi_attrib.default_irq	= dev->irq;	/* Save IOAPIC IRQ */
>  	entry->msi_attrib.multi_cap	= (control & PCI_MSI_FLAGS_QMASK) >> 1;
>  	entry->msi_attrib.multiple	= ilog2(__roundup_pow_of_two(nvec));
> @@ -495,7 +494,7 @@ msi_setup_entry(struct pci_dev *dev, int
>  		entry->mask_pos = dev->msi_cap + PCI_MSI_MASK_32;
>  
>  	/* Save the initial mask status */
> -	if (entry->msi_attrib.maskbit)
> +	if (entry->msi_attrib.can_mask)
>  		pci_read_config_dword(dev, entry->mask_pos, &entry->msi_mask);
>  
>  out:
> @@ -638,10 +637,13 @@ static int msix_setup_entries(struct pci
>  		entry->msi_attrib.is_virtual =
>  			entry->msi_attrib.entry_nr >= vec_count;
>  
> +		entry->msi_attrib.can_mask	= !pci_msi_ignore_mask &&
> +						  !entry->msi_attrib.is_virtual;
> +
>  		entry->msi_attrib.default_irq	= dev->irq;
>  		entry->mask_base		= base;
>  
> -		if (!entry->msi_attrib.is_virtual) {
> +		if (!entry->msi_attrib.can_mask) {
>  			addr = pci_msix_desc_addr(entry);
>  			entry->msix_ctrl = readl(addr + PCI_MSIX_ENTRY_VECTOR_CTRL);
>  		}
> --- a/include/linux/msi.h
> +++ b/include/linux/msi.h
> @@ -148,7 +148,7 @@ struct msi_desc {
>  				u8	is_msix		: 1;
>  				u8	multiple	: 3;
>  				u8	multi_cap	: 3;
> -				u8	maskbit		: 1;
> +				u8	can_mask	: 1;
>  				u8	is_64		: 1;
>  				u8	is_virtual	: 1;
>  				u16	entry_nr;
Thanks,
I'll test this out ASAP.

  reply	other threads:[~2021-10-27  9:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-10-18  6:22 [PATCH] PCI/MSI: Re-add checks for skip masking MSI-X on Xen PV Josef Johansson
2021-10-19 19:57 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2021-10-19 20:15   ` Josef Johansson
2021-10-19 20:29     ` Bjorn Helgaas
2021-10-19 21:48       ` [PATCH v2] " Josef Johansson
2021-10-20 12:51         ` Marc Zyngier
2021-10-20 14:03           ` Jason Andryuk
2021-10-21  8:25             ` Josef Johansson
2021-10-24 18:55               ` Josef Johansson
2021-10-25  1:25                 ` [PATCH] PCI/MSI: Fix masking MSI/MSI-X " Jason Andryuk
2021-10-25  7:44                   ` David Woodhouse
2021-10-25 11:43                     ` Roger Pau Monné
2021-10-25 11:53                       ` David Woodhouse
2021-10-25 12:58                         ` Roger Pau Monné
2021-10-25 13:02                           ` David Woodhouse
2021-10-25 14:12                             ` Roger Pau Monné
2021-10-25 12:31                     ` Jason Andryuk
2021-10-25 12:27                   ` Jason Andryuk
2021-10-25 16:46                     ` Josef Johansson
2021-10-26 21:17                       ` Josef Johansson
2021-10-27  8:45                   ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-10-27  9:50                     ` [PATCH] PCI/MSI: Move non-mask check back into low level accessors Thomas Gleixner
2021-10-27  9:54                       ` Josef Johansson [this message]
2021-10-27 12:01                         ` Josef Johansson
2021-10-27 15:29                           ` Josef Johansson
2021-11-03 23:26                             ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-11-03 23:27                               ` [PATCH v2] " Thomas Gleixner
2021-11-09 14:53                                 ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-11-10 13:31                                   ` Josef Johansson
2021-11-10 16:05                                     ` Josef Johansson
2021-11-03 23:45                             ` [PATCH] " Thomas Gleixner
2021-11-04  9:00                               ` Josef Johansson
2021-11-04 17:12                               ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-11-04 17:31                               ` Vincent Guittot
2021-11-10 20:30                               ` Josef Johansson
2021-11-10 23:13                                 ` Josef Johansson
2021-10-27  9:57                       ` David Woodhouse
2021-10-25  1:25                 ` [PATCH v2] PCI/MSI: Re-add checks for skip masking MSI-X on Xen PV Jason Andryuk
2021-10-25 19:21                   ` Josef Johansson
2021-10-27  6:24                     ` David Woodhouse
2021-10-27  8:13                       ` Josef Johansson
2021-10-27  8:26                         ` David Woodhouse

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=d1cc20aa-5c5c-6c7b-2e5d-bc31362ad891@oderland.se \
    --to=josef@oderland.se \
    --cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
    --cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
    --cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
    --cc=jandryuk@gmail.com \
    --cc=jgross@suse.com \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).