From: Josef Johansson <josef@oderland.se>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com, helgaas@kernel.org, jgross@suse.com,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, maz@kernel.org,
xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
Jason Andryuk <jandryuk@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI/MSI: Move non-mask check back into low level accessors
Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2021 11:54:19 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d1cc20aa-5c5c-6c7b-2e5d-bc31362ad891@oderland.se> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87cznqg5k8.ffs@tglx>
On 10/27/21 11:50, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> The recent rework of PCI/MSI[X] masking moved the non-mask checks from the
> low level accessors into the higher level mask/unmask functions.
>
> This missed the fact that these accessors can be invoked from other places
> as well. The missing checks break XEN-PV which sets pci_msi_ignore_mask and
> also violates the virtual MSIX and the msi_attrib.maskbit protections.
>
> Instead of sprinkling checks all over the place, lift them back into the
> low level accessor functions. To avoid checking three different conditions
> combine them into one property of msi_desc::msi_attrib.
>
> Reported-by: Josef Johansson <josef@oderland.se>
> Fixes: fcacdfbef5a1 ("PCI/MSI: Provide a new set of mask and unmask functions")
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> Cc: Jason Andryuk <jandryuk@gmail.com>
> Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
> Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
> Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>
> Cc: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
> Cc: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>
> Cc: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
> ---
> drivers/pci/msi.c | 26 ++++++++++++++------------
> include/linux/msi.h | 2 +-
> 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>
> --- a/drivers/pci/msi.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/msi.c
> @@ -148,6 +148,9 @@ static noinline void pci_msi_update_mask
> raw_spinlock_t *lock = &desc->dev->msi_lock;
> unsigned long flags;
>
> + if (!desc->msi_attrib.can_mask)
> + return;
> +
> raw_spin_lock_irqsave(lock, flags);
> desc->msi_mask &= ~clear;
> desc->msi_mask |= set;
> @@ -181,7 +184,8 @@ static void pci_msix_write_vector_ctrl(s
> {
> void __iomem *desc_addr = pci_msix_desc_addr(desc);
>
> - writel(ctrl, desc_addr + PCI_MSIX_ENTRY_VECTOR_CTRL);
> + if (desc->msi_attrib.can_mask)
> + writel(ctrl, desc_addr + PCI_MSIX_ENTRY_VECTOR_CTRL);
> }
>
> static inline void pci_msix_mask(struct msi_desc *desc)
> @@ -200,23 +204,17 @@ static inline void pci_msix_unmask(struc
>
> static void __pci_msi_mask_desc(struct msi_desc *desc, u32 mask)
> {
> - if (pci_msi_ignore_mask || desc->msi_attrib.is_virtual)
> - return;
> -
> if (desc->msi_attrib.is_msix)
> pci_msix_mask(desc);
> - else if (desc->msi_attrib.maskbit)
> + else
> pci_msi_mask(desc, mask);
> }
>
> static void __pci_msi_unmask_desc(struct msi_desc *desc, u32 mask)
> {
> - if (pci_msi_ignore_mask || desc->msi_attrib.is_virtual)
> - return;
> -
> if (desc->msi_attrib.is_msix)
> pci_msix_unmask(desc);
> - else if (desc->msi_attrib.maskbit)
> + else
> pci_msi_unmask(desc, mask);
> }
>
> @@ -484,7 +482,8 @@ msi_setup_entry(struct pci_dev *dev, int
> entry->msi_attrib.is_64 = !!(control & PCI_MSI_FLAGS_64BIT);
> entry->msi_attrib.is_virtual = 0;
> entry->msi_attrib.entry_nr = 0;
> - entry->msi_attrib.maskbit = !!(control & PCI_MSI_FLAGS_MASKBIT);
> + entry->msi_attrib.can_mask = !pci_msi_ignore_mask &&
> + !!(control & PCI_MSI_FLAGS_MASKBIT);
> entry->msi_attrib.default_irq = dev->irq; /* Save IOAPIC IRQ */
> entry->msi_attrib.multi_cap = (control & PCI_MSI_FLAGS_QMASK) >> 1;
> entry->msi_attrib.multiple = ilog2(__roundup_pow_of_two(nvec));
> @@ -495,7 +494,7 @@ msi_setup_entry(struct pci_dev *dev, int
> entry->mask_pos = dev->msi_cap + PCI_MSI_MASK_32;
>
> /* Save the initial mask status */
> - if (entry->msi_attrib.maskbit)
> + if (entry->msi_attrib.can_mask)
> pci_read_config_dword(dev, entry->mask_pos, &entry->msi_mask);
>
> out:
> @@ -638,10 +637,13 @@ static int msix_setup_entries(struct pci
> entry->msi_attrib.is_virtual =
> entry->msi_attrib.entry_nr >= vec_count;
>
> + entry->msi_attrib.can_mask = !pci_msi_ignore_mask &&
> + !entry->msi_attrib.is_virtual;
> +
> entry->msi_attrib.default_irq = dev->irq;
> entry->mask_base = base;
>
> - if (!entry->msi_attrib.is_virtual) {
> + if (!entry->msi_attrib.can_mask) {
> addr = pci_msix_desc_addr(entry);
> entry->msix_ctrl = readl(addr + PCI_MSIX_ENTRY_VECTOR_CTRL);
> }
> --- a/include/linux/msi.h
> +++ b/include/linux/msi.h
> @@ -148,7 +148,7 @@ struct msi_desc {
> u8 is_msix : 1;
> u8 multiple : 3;
> u8 multi_cap : 3;
> - u8 maskbit : 1;
> + u8 can_mask : 1;
> u8 is_64 : 1;
> u8 is_virtual : 1;
> u16 entry_nr;
Thanks,
I'll test this out ASAP.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-10-27 9:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-10-18 6:22 [PATCH] PCI/MSI: Re-add checks for skip masking MSI-X on Xen PV Josef Johansson
2021-10-19 19:57 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2021-10-19 20:15 ` Josef Johansson
2021-10-19 20:29 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2021-10-19 21:48 ` [PATCH v2] " Josef Johansson
2021-10-20 12:51 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-10-20 14:03 ` Jason Andryuk
2021-10-21 8:25 ` Josef Johansson
2021-10-24 18:55 ` Josef Johansson
2021-10-25 1:25 ` [PATCH] PCI/MSI: Fix masking MSI/MSI-X " Jason Andryuk
2021-10-25 7:44 ` David Woodhouse
2021-10-25 11:43 ` Roger Pau Monné
2021-10-25 11:53 ` David Woodhouse
2021-10-25 12:58 ` Roger Pau Monné
2021-10-25 13:02 ` David Woodhouse
2021-10-25 14:12 ` Roger Pau Monné
2021-10-25 12:31 ` Jason Andryuk
2021-10-25 12:27 ` Jason Andryuk
2021-10-25 16:46 ` Josef Johansson
2021-10-26 21:17 ` Josef Johansson
2021-10-27 8:45 ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-10-27 9:50 ` [PATCH] PCI/MSI: Move non-mask check back into low level accessors Thomas Gleixner
2021-10-27 9:54 ` Josef Johansson [this message]
2021-10-27 12:01 ` Josef Johansson
2021-10-27 15:29 ` Josef Johansson
2021-11-03 23:26 ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-11-03 23:27 ` [PATCH v2] " Thomas Gleixner
2021-11-09 14:53 ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-11-10 13:31 ` Josef Johansson
2021-11-10 16:05 ` Josef Johansson
2021-11-03 23:45 ` [PATCH] " Thomas Gleixner
2021-11-04 9:00 ` Josef Johansson
2021-11-04 17:12 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-11-04 17:31 ` Vincent Guittot
2021-11-10 20:30 ` Josef Johansson
2021-11-10 23:13 ` Josef Johansson
2021-10-27 9:57 ` David Woodhouse
2021-10-25 1:25 ` [PATCH v2] PCI/MSI: Re-add checks for skip masking MSI-X on Xen PV Jason Andryuk
2021-10-25 19:21 ` Josef Johansson
2021-10-27 6:24 ` David Woodhouse
2021-10-27 8:13 ` Josef Johansson
2021-10-27 8:26 ` David Woodhouse
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d1cc20aa-5c5c-6c7b-2e5d-bc31362ad891@oderland.se \
--to=josef@oderland.se \
--cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
--cc=jandryuk@gmail.com \
--cc=jgross@suse.com \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).