From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.55.52.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 90BA215483 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2024 11:27:40 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="hYA+flOV" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1704972460; x=1736508460; h=from:date:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:message-id: references:mime-version:content-id; bh=xXWmYVlMtjwPyMl92YjMvCtv+wmiTuFQ9doXpCwoEgY=; b=hYA+flOV/PDfuRdIBFhQd2dU0EFqrSeqCDTEb1LSRgKaTg8ZJmQQhJlC IYKJ5yObqp1FRJchCIjyRWRvm1c9b38QsD0TJzTCxBNABmIkh+9RYwDsq BkeC1B728+Jn+nEPku8S4AwEbT/KjEwMQ0lTEaxxoO9sAOD/dn/xGiKQL fV246eRPnWnOyDBS8ERXwOHLpx+GmWHTcYX2gh2OO6OtZgu78ZcrjaSgj 16zqtBo4f64j7SiVrMW3z5qVIxiIaFerLmaRbWPpUNA7KchOu86WpLspx oqmtyK9Gs2yqbrXfucpnt3fuTAPQaF3ZAAAivItKP2c4L+8d0zy/CBtsS A==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10949"; a="398509430" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.04,186,1695711600"; d="scan'208";a="398509430" Received: from orviesa001.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.141]) by fmsmga103.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 11 Jan 2024 03:27:39 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.04,186,1695711600"; d="scan'208";a="30968971" Received: from ijarvine-desk1.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO localhost) ([10.246.32.201]) by smtpauth.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 11 Jan 2024 03:27:30 -0800 From: =?UTF-8?q?Ilpo=20J=C3=A4rvinen?= Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2024 13:27:25 +0200 (EET) To: "Wang, Qingshun" cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com, chao.p.peng@intel.com, erwin.tsaur@intel.com, feiting.wanyan@intel.com, qingshun.wang@intel.com, Andy Shevchenko , "Luck, Tony" Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] pci/aer: Store more information in aer_err_info In-Reply-To: <20240111073227.31488-2-qingshun.wang@linux.intel.com> Message-ID: References: <20240111073227.31488-1-qingshun.wang@linux.intel.com> <20240111073227.31488-2-qingshun.wang@linux.intel.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; BOUNDARY="8323328-1098820707-1704972372=:1278" Content-ID: This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. --8323328-1098820707-1704972372=:1278 Content-Type: text/plain; CHARSET=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Content-ID: On Thu, 11 Jan 2024, Wang, Qingshun wrote: > Store status and mask of both correctable and uncorrectable errors in > aer_err_info. Severity of uncorrectable errors and the values of Device > Status register is also recorded in order to filter out errors that > cannot cause Advisory Non-Fatal error. >=20 > Refactor rest of the code to use cor/uncor_status and cor/uncor_mask > fields instead of status and mask fields. >=20 > Reviewed-by: "Andy Shevchenko" > Reviewed-by: "Luck, Tony" > Reviewed-by: "Ilpo J=E4rvinen" Hi, I don't recall giving my tag for this. You are not allowed to make them up unless the person explicitly gives that Reviewed-by line to you in one of= =20 the replies. That is, please don't infer the Reviewed-by tag from just=20 replying. --=20 i. --8323328-1098820707-1704972372=:1278--