From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-pci-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from smtp.codeaurora.org ([198.145.29.96]:37342 "EHLO
        smtp.codeaurora.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S1750947AbeARFWr (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>); Thu, 18 Jan 2018 00:22:47 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII;
 format=flowed
Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2018 10:52:46 +0530
From: poza@codeaurora.org
To: Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
        Philippe Ombredanne <pombredanne@nexb.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        Kate Stewart <kstewart@linuxfoundation.org>,
        linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Dongdong Liu <liudongdong3@huawei.com>,
        Keith Busch <keith.busch@intel.com>, Wei Zhang <wzhang@fb.com>,
        Timur Tabi <timur@codeaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 3/4] PCI/DPC: Unify and plumb error handling into DPC
In-Reply-To: <298df660-1f7d-85ab-51db-11dc5d80cc75@codeaurora.org>
References: <1516185438-31556-1-git-send-email-poza@codeaurora.org>
 <1516185438-31556-4-git-send-email-poza@codeaurora.org>
 <298df660-1f7d-85ab-51db-11dc5d80cc75@codeaurora.org>
Message-ID: <d78da5a5465c7a1696db755385393519@codeaurora.org>
Sender: linux-pci-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-pci.vger.kernel.org>

On 2018-01-17 22:15, Sinan Kaya wrote:
> On 1/17/2018 5:37 AM, Oza Pawandeep wrote:
>> +		driver = pci_find_dpc_service(udev);
>> +#endif
>>  #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PCIEAER)
>> -	/* Use the aer driver of the component firstly */
>> -	driver = pci_find_aer_service(udev);
> 
> I think we need a pci_find_service function that unifies these two.

Right now, find_xxx_service are in their respective file and exporting 
it.
which makes sense no less than having generic function.

If I have to change pci_find_service(...., int service_name) then it has 
to be somewhere in generic file.
probably portdrv_core.c

either way I am fine but just thinking out if its really required.

Regards,
Oza.