From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.6 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FC85C4363A for ; Thu, 8 Oct 2020 11:13:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B210921D92 for ; Thu, 8 Oct 2020 11:13:42 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="NcL+IMqB" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1725944AbgJHLNl (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Oct 2020 07:13:41 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([216.205.24.124]:56372 "EHLO us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725966AbgJHLNj (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Oct 2020 07:13:39 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1602155618; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=YBZn6nJCSKSkT+CI1BoIQTp+DUMyPcnk9FhFCR2fIho=; b=NcL+IMqBrGvUifP+1HVyARVFHKJcZyMDxAiws3/+jP/xFPT/WVS22er0khgnCgovwBSd1U 0550vLBupz9/W5HCaNS/FGS5nwEyQcxyXwYAIrdkvJ2F2YAcdx9xIjGuSZ1OYrE0fh46RX Ywzdv5FnV4VszxmYdqhRnbGs7GDVU90= Received: from mail-ed1-f72.google.com (mail-ed1-f72.google.com [209.85.208.72]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-399-aO75Dz6oP6OZuWdBbyNC2A-1; Thu, 08 Oct 2020 07:13:36 -0400 X-MC-Unique: aO75Dz6oP6OZuWdBbyNC2A-1 Received: by mail-ed1-f72.google.com with SMTP id dc23so2058642edb.13 for ; Thu, 08 Oct 2020 04:13:36 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=YBZn6nJCSKSkT+CI1BoIQTp+DUMyPcnk9FhFCR2fIho=; b=l5hv7ngI2azqZSi0x/DGLIiECGmVPXBkLrt9HlzHanv4zzeXy6/uDhQYidS2KWGU1I gGd3PSNsgk8W2YTl+ikLxtqErvoRCyYG88WzZndOTVjDUCXSVY01xbDxUE20b84oAFBF M2kSHvYcE4igMINaWSP5EVp0yjrxlpB0zD8oyXGG6pg8Y1n6Fukpky6VUsBw45ehUARn mTCO/0tKC8C0L7e12e5u6Oo95uGcsLs2VF4qjBRY0sElKo6KwN3ts20SfAMi4ZcAmVjv j9R1rzwqlV88ibTGR987UO8xwNYC+H0fzuDBwx7xuxt2yIPRDMSxjBG3R6k02f/rMD23 mfkg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531vzy+789MJqDbao7BMs8nDjoVi5Pk6+H7EyJCSuzEc3w8IZiVO OSMxiUoIrKZwj4xH+YfNz6ikOtS+gyq+Ffg/mp4N1vnhA21+VoReZETIFfGKdffNzPitXRYGdF+ yr+gBZuqKFMqE1BGa7ZBY X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:c1c3:: with SMTP id bw3mr8032626ejb.516.1602155614910; Thu, 08 Oct 2020 04:13:34 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwEgivjRQZ4xl3+6on1EF37giFgkAAQ1outiY+0shIhvn0v2U82j8Sh6TGq4UfML8q48DryFQ== X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:c1c3:: with SMTP id bw3mr8032602ejb.516.1602155614686; Thu, 08 Oct 2020 04:13:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from x1.localdomain (2001-1c00-0c0c-fe00-d2ea-f29d-118b-24dc.cable.dynamic.v6.ziggo.nl. [2001:1c00:c0c:fe00:d2ea:f29d:118b:24dc]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id g8sm3775588ejp.73.2020.10.08.04.13.33 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 08 Oct 2020 04:13:34 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH V8 1/5] PCI: Add defines for Designated Vendor-Specific Extended Capability To: Lee Jones Cc: "David E. Box" , Bjorn Helgaas , dvhart@infradead.org, andy@infradead.org, bhelgaas@google.com, alexey.budankov@linux.intel.com, Andy Shevchenko , rjw@rjwysocki.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org References: <20201007005118.GA3230211@bjorn-Precision-5520> <20201007065451.GB6148@dell> <20201008072912.GE1763265@dell> From: Hans de Goede Message-ID: Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2020 13:13:33 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20201008072912.GE1763265@dell> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org Hi, On 10/8/20 9:29 AM, Lee Jones wrote: > On Wed, 07 Oct 2020, Hans de Goede wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> On 10/7/20 8:54 AM, Lee Jones wrote: >>> On Tue, 06 Oct 2020, David E. Box wrote: >>> >>>> On Tue, 2020-10-06 at 19:51 -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: >>>>> On Tue, Oct 06, 2020 at 03:45:54PM -0700, David E. Box wrote: >>>>>> Hi Bjorn, >>>>>> >>>>>> This patch has been acked and unchanged for weeks. Is it possible >>>>>> to >>>>>> get this pulled into next? We have SIOV and CXL related work that >>>>>> is >>>>>> using these definitions. Thanks. >>>>> >>>>> I acked it because I expected you to merge it along with the rest of >>>>> the series. >>>>> >>>>> I guess I could merge this patch via the PCI tree if you really want, >>>>> but that ends up being a hassle because we have to worry about which >>>>> order things get merged to Linus' tree. Better if the whole series >>>>> is >>>>> merged via the same tree. >>>> >>>> Agreed. The hope is that this series is ready for the next merge window >>>> but no ack yet on V8. And if the series does not make it I'd like this >>>> patch to at least get in. >>> >>> If Bjorn is happy to take this patch so late in the release cycle then >>> please go ahead. The other patches are due for v5.11. >> >> I agree (that the other patches are for 5.11) talking about merging >> this series patch 2 is a mfd patch and patches 3-5 are drivers/platform/x86 >> patches. >> >> Lee, FYI I'm taking over drivers/platform/x86 maintainership from Andy. > > Congratulations, Hans. > >> I suggest that we merge the entire series through a single tree >> (with acks or reviewed-by-s from the other maintainer) >> either through the mfd tree or through the drivers/platform/x86 >> tree. Since most changes are in drivers/platform/x86 the latter >> probably makes more sense, but either way works for me. >> So how would you like to proceed with this series ? > > I'm happy either way, but bear in mind that, due to the intrinsic > heterogeneous nature of MFD, I already have infrastructure to easily > apply (and send pull-requests for) cross-subsystem patch-sets. Ok, you applying the entire series to the mfd tree is fine with me. I'll try to review the entire series next week and then we'll see from there. Regards, Hans