public inbox for linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Niklas Schnelle <niks@kernel.org>
To: Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>, Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
	Ilpo Jarvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>,
	 Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>,
	Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>,
	"Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@orcam.me.uk>,
	Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH for-linus v2 3/3] PCI/bwctrl: Enable only if more than one speed is supported
Date: Sun, 15 Dec 2024 22:03:21 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <db9b708991eb9bfdb358bbcd460c70715593c0a4.camel@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2292e75dcf26f1c6d7c1f715edfe0e49f079149d.1734257330.git.lukas@wunner.de>

On Sun, 2024-12-15 at 11:20 +0100, Lukas Wunner wrote:
> If a PCIe port only supports a single speed, enabling bandwidth control
> is pointless:  There's no need to monitor autonomous speed changes, nor
> can the speed be changed.
> 
> Not enabling it saves a small amount of memory and compute resources,
> but also fixes a boot hang reported by Niklas:  It occurs when enabling
> bandwidth control on Downstream Ports of Intel JHL7540 "Titan Ridge 2018"
> Thunderbolt controllers.  The ports only support 2.5 GT/s in accordance
> with USB4 v2 sec 11.2.1, so the present commit works around the issue.
> 
> PCIe r6.2 sec 8.2.1 prescribes that:
> 
>    "A device must support 2.5 GT/s and is not permitted to skip support
>     for any data rates between 2.5 GT/s and the highest supported rate."
> 
> Consequently, bandwidth control is currently only disabled if a port
> doesn't support higher speeds than 2.5 GT/s.  However the Implementation
> Note in PCIe r6.2 sec 7.5.3.18 cautions:
> 
>    "It is strongly encouraged that software primarily utilize the
>     Supported Link Speeds Vector instead of the Max Link Speed field,
>     so that software can determine the exact set of supported speeds on
>     current and future hardware.  This can avoid software being confused
>     if a future specification defines Links that do not require support
>     for all slower speeds."
> 
> In other words, future revisions of the PCIe Base Spec may allow gaps
> in the Supported Link Speeds Vector.  To be future-proof, don't just
> check whether speeds above 2.5 GT/s are supported, but rather check
> whether *more than one* speed is supported.
> 
> Fixes: 665745f27487 ("PCI/bwctrl: Re-add BW notification portdrv as PCIe BW controller")
> Reported-by: Niklas Schnelle <niks@kernel.org>
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/r/db8e457fcd155436449b035e8791a8241b0df400.camel@kernel.org/
> Signed-off-by: Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>
> Cc: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/pci/pcie/portdrv.c | 4 +++-
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pcie/portdrv.c b/drivers/pci/pcie/portdrv.c
> index 5e10306b6308..02e73099bad0 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/pcie/portdrv.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/pcie/portdrv.c
> @@ -265,12 +265,14 @@ static int get_port_device_capability(struct pci_dev *dev)
>  	    (pcie_ports_dpc_native || (services & PCIE_PORT_SERVICE_AER)))
>  		services |= PCIE_PORT_SERVICE_DPC;
>  
> +	/* Enable bandwidth control if more than one speed is supported. */
>  	if (pci_pcie_type(dev) == PCI_EXP_TYPE_DOWNSTREAM ||
>  	    pci_pcie_type(dev) == PCI_EXP_TYPE_ROOT_PORT) {
>  		u32 linkcap;
>  
>  		pcie_capability_read_dword(dev, PCI_EXP_LNKCAP, &linkcap);
> -		if (linkcap & PCI_EXP_LNKCAP_LBNC)
> +		if (linkcap & PCI_EXP_LNKCAP_LBNC &&
> +		    hweight8(dev->supported_speeds) > 1)
>  			services |= PCIE_PORT_SERVICE_BWCTRL;
>  	}
>  

I can confirm that this in combination with the two other patches fixes
my problem. I'm still a little unsure if we want to go with a more
minimal patch for v6.13-rc to take more time to figure out the correct
handling in patch 1, but I think medium term this is the right overall
approach.

Either way, feel free to add:

Tested-by: Niklas Schnelle <niks@kernel.org>

  reply	other threads:[~2024-12-15 21:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-12-15 10:20 [PATCH for-linus v2 0/3] Fix bwctrl boot hang Lukas Wunner
2024-12-15 10:20 ` [PATCH for-linus v2 1/3] PCI: Assume 2.5 GT/s if Max Link Speed is undefined Lukas Wunner
2024-12-15 21:17   ` Niklas Schnelle
2024-12-16  6:45     ` Lukas Wunner
2024-12-16 10:51   ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-12-16 14:09   ` Ilpo Järvinen
2024-12-16 14:17   ` Mario Limonciello
2024-12-15 10:20 ` [PATCH for-linus v2 2/3] PCI: Honor Max Link Speed when determining supported speeds Lukas Wunner
2024-12-15 20:56   ` Niklas Schnelle
2024-12-16 10:53   ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-12-16 14:12   ` Ilpo Järvinen
2024-12-15 10:20 ` [PATCH for-linus v2 3/3] PCI/bwctrl: Enable only if more than one speed is supported Lukas Wunner
2024-12-15 21:03   ` Niklas Schnelle [this message]
2024-12-16 11:32   ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-12-16 14:20     ` Mario Limonciello

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=db9b708991eb9bfdb358bbcd460c70715593c0a4.camel@kernel.org \
    --to=niks@kernel.org \
    --cc=Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com \
    --cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
    --cc=ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lukas@wunner.de \
    --cc=macro@orcam.me.uk \
    --cc=mario.limonciello@amd.com \
    --cc=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox