linux-pci.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Alex G." <mr.nuke.me@gmail.com>
To: Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org>,
	Alex_Gagniuc@Dellteam.com, bhelgaas@google.com
Cc: Austin.Bolen@dell.com, Shyam.Iyer@dell.com,
	keith.busch@intel.com, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI: Check for PCIe downtraining conditions
Date: Thu, 31 May 2018 11:50:25 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <dbe16533-1878-13ed-709a-04b3a75fe477@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <54071f83-5d0d-04a0-d448-0c99ec0ffc4f@gmail.com>



On 05/31/2018 11:49 AM, Alex G. wrote:
> 
> 
> On 05/31/2018 11:13 AM, Sinan Kaya wrote:
>> On 5/31/2018 12:01 PM, Alex G. wrote:
>>>>       PCI: Add pcie_print_link_status() to log link speed and whether it's limited
>>> This one, I have, but it's not what I need. This looks at the available
>>> bandwidth from root port to endpoint, whereas I'm only interested in
>>> downtraining between endpoint and upstream port.
>>
>> I see what you are saying. 
>>
>> With a little bit of effort, you can reuse the same code.
>>
>> Here is an attempt.
>>
>> You can probably extend pcie_bandwidth_available() to put an optional parent bridge
>> device for your own use case and terminate the loop around here.
>>
>> https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v4.17-rc7/source/drivers/pci/pci.c#L5182
>>
>> Then, you can use the existing code to achieve what you are looking for via
>> pcie_print_link_status() by adding an optional parent parameter.
>>
>> 	bw_cap = pcie_bandwidth_capable(dev, &speed_cap, &width_cap);
>> 	bw_avail = pcie_bandwidth_available(dev, &limiting_dev, &speed, &width, *parent*);
> 
> That's confusing.

"confusing" refers to the way the code currently works. It doesn't refer
to your proposal.


Alex

 I'd expect _capable() and _available() to be
> symmetrical. They either both look at one link only, or both go down to
> the root port. Though it seems _capable() is link-local, and
> _available() is down to root port.
> 
>>
>> If parent parameter is NULL, code can walk all the way to root as it is doing today.
>> If it is not, then will terminate the loop on the first iteration.
>>

  reply	other threads:[~2018-05-31 16:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-05-31 15:05 [PATCH] PCI: Check for PCIe downtraining conditions Alexandru Gagniuc
2018-05-31 15:28 ` Sinan Kaya
2018-05-31 15:29   ` Alex_Gagniuc
2018-05-31 15:38     ` Sinan Kaya
2018-05-31 15:46       ` Alex G.
2018-05-31 15:54         ` Sinan Kaya
2018-05-31 16:01           ` Alex G.
2018-05-31 16:13             ` Sinan Kaya
2018-05-31 16:49               ` Alex G.
2018-05-31 16:50                 ` Alex G. [this message]
2018-05-31 17:11                 ` Sinan Kaya
2018-05-31 17:27                   ` Alex G.
2018-05-31 21:52                     ` Alex G.
2018-05-31 15:30 ` Sinan Kaya
2018-05-31 21:44   ` Alex G.
2018-06-01 13:30     ` Sinan Kaya
2018-06-02 17:42 ` Pavel Machek

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=dbe16533-1878-13ed-709a-04b3a75fe477@gmail.com \
    --to=mr.nuke.me@gmail.com \
    --cc=Alex_Gagniuc@Dellteam.com \
    --cc=Austin.Bolen@dell.com \
    --cc=Shyam.Iyer@dell.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=keith.busch@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=okaya@codeaurora.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).