From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Subject: Re: 4.7 regression: ACPI: No IRQ available for PCI Interrupt Link [LNKD]. Try pci=noacpi or acpi=off To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" References: <201609251512.05657.linux@rainbow-software.org> <201609300844.24325.linux@rainbow-software.org> <677698369b23f5a6bcf3a66fed78802f@codeaurora.org> <201609301756.25894.linux@rainbow-software.org> <94aee80e-f7c3-5732-ef1e-08e3ecb19e5e@codeaurora.org> <5ee9b263-ed42-ee16-057e-2f4c1d2c1dc6@codeaurora.org> Cc: Ondrej Zary , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Bjorn Helgaas , Linux Kernel Mailing List , ACPI Devel Maling List , Linux PCI , wim@djo.tudelft.nl, ravikanth.nalla@hpe.com From: Sinan Kaya Message-ID: Date: Sat, 1 Oct 2016 13:49:17 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 9/30/2016 5:27 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >>> >> What's the drawback, if any? >> > >> > I don't see any drawback to be honest. > I'd go for it then, if Bjorn doesn't hate it. > I posted a follow up patch a minute ago. [PATCH 1/3] Revert "ACPI,PCI,IRQ: reduce static IRQ array size to 16" [PATCH 2/3] ACPI, PCI IRQ: add PCI_USING penalty for ISA interrupts [PATCH 3/3] Revert "ACPI,PCI,IRQ: remove SCI penalize function" Can we have some testing coverage? and eventually have tested-by? -- Sinan Kaya Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies, Inc. as an affiliate of Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.