linux-pci.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alistair Francis <Alistair.Francis@wdc.com>
To: "dwmw2@infradead.org" <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
	"davem@davemloft.net" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	"herbert@gondor.apana.org.au" <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>,
	"alex.williamson@redhat.com" <alex.williamson@redhat.com>,
	"linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org" <linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org>,
	"dhowells@redhat.com" <dhowells@redhat.com>,
	"helgaas@kernel.org" <helgaas@kernel.org>,
	"linux-pci@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
	"lukas@wunner.de" <lukas@wunner.de>,
	"linux-coco@lists.linux.dev" <linux-coco@lists.linux.dev>,
	"kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org" <linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org>,
	"keyrings@vger.kernel.org" <keyrings@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: "zhi.a.wang@intel.com" <zhi.a.wang@intel.com>,
	"linuxarm@huawei.com" <linuxarm@huawei.com>,
	"dave.jiang@intel.com" <dave.jiang@intel.com>,
	"aik@amd.com" <aik@amd.com>,
	"Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com" <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>,
	"ming4.li@intel.com" <ming4.li@intel.com>,
	"dan.j.williams@intel.com" <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
	"david.e.box@intel.com" <david.e.box@intel.com>,
	Wilfred Mallawa <wilfred.mallawa@wdc.com>,
	"seanjc@google.com" <seanjc@google.com>,
	"thomas.lendacky@amd.com" <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>,
	"graf@amazon.com" <graf@amazon.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/12] certs: Create blacklist keyring earlier
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2023 02:20:22 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <df8c403791a588b97188bf0465426a270e3a4e6c.camel@wdc.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3db7a8856833dfcbc4b122301f233828379d67db.1695921657.git.lukas@wunner.de>

On Thu, 2023-09-28 at 19:32 +0200, Lukas Wunner wrote:
> The upcoming support for PCI device authentication with CMA-SPDM
> (PCIe r6.1 sec 6.31) requires parsing X.509 certificates upon
> device enumeration, which happens in a subsys_initcall().
> 
> Parsing X.509 certificates accesses the blacklist keyring:
> x509_cert_parse()
>   x509_get_sig_params()
>     is_hash_blacklisted()
>       keyring_search()
> 
> So far the keyring is created much later in a device_initcall(). 
> Avoid
> a NULL pointer dereference on access to the keyring by creating it
> one
> initcall level earlier than PCI device enumeration, i.e. in an
> arch_initcall().
> 
> Signed-off-by: Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>

Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>

Alistair

> ---
>  certs/blacklist.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/certs/blacklist.c b/certs/blacklist.c
> index 675dd7a8f07a..34185415d451 100644
> --- a/certs/blacklist.c
> +++ b/certs/blacklist.c
> @@ -311,7 +311,7 @@ static int restrict_link_for_blacklist(struct key
> *dest_keyring,
>   * Initialise the blacklist
>   *
>   * The blacklist_init() function is registered as an initcall via
> - * device_initcall().  As a result if the blacklist_init() function
> fails for
> + * arch_initcall().  As a result if the blacklist_init() function
> fails for
>   * any reason the kernel continues to execute.  While cleanly
> returning -ENODEV
>   * could be acceptable for some non-critical kernel parts, if the
> blacklist
>   * keyring fails to load it defeats the certificate/key based deny
> list for
> @@ -356,7 +356,7 @@ static int __init blacklist_init(void)
>  /*
>   * Must be initialised before we try and load the keys into the
> keyring.
>   */
> -device_initcall(blacklist_init);
> +arch_initcall(blacklist_init);
>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_SYSTEM_REVOCATION_LIST
>  /*


  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-10-12  2:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 83+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-09-28 17:32 [PATCH 00/12] PCI device authentication Lukas Wunner
2023-09-28 17:32 ` [PATCH 01/12] X.509: Make certificate parser public Lukas Wunner
2023-10-03  7:57   ` Ilpo Järvinen
2023-10-03 15:13   ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-10-06 18:47   ` Dan Williams
2023-09-28 17:32 ` [PATCH 04/12] certs: Create blacklist keyring earlier Lukas Wunner
2023-10-03  8:37   ` Ilpo Järvinen
2023-10-03 22:53     ` Wilfred Mallawa
2023-10-03  9:10   ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-10-06 19:19   ` Dan Williams
2023-10-12  2:20   ` Alistair Francis [this message]
2023-09-28 17:32 ` [PATCH 03/12] X.509: Move certificate length retrieval into new helper Lukas Wunner
2023-10-02 16:44   ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-10-03  8:31   ` Ilpo Järvinen
2023-10-06 19:15   ` Dan Williams
2024-03-04  6:57     ` Lukas Wunner
2024-03-04 19:19       ` Dan Williams
2023-09-28 17:32 ` [PATCH 02/12] X.509: Parse Subject Alternative Name in certificates Lukas Wunner
2023-10-03  8:31   ` Ilpo Järvinen
2023-10-03 22:52     ` Wilfred Mallawa
2023-10-03 15:14   ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-10-06 19:09   ` Dan Williams
2023-09-28 17:32 ` [PATCH 05/12] crypto: akcipher - Support more than one signature encoding Lukas Wunner
2023-10-02 16:59   ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-10-06 19:23   ` Dan Williams
2023-10-07 14:46     ` Lukas Wunner
2023-09-28 17:32 ` [PATCH 06/12] crypto: ecdsa - Support P1363 " Lukas Wunner
2023-10-02 16:57   ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-09-28 17:32 ` [PATCH 07/12] spdm: Introduce library to authenticate devices Lukas Wunner
2023-10-03 10:35   ` Ilpo Järvinen
2024-02-09 20:32     ` Lukas Wunner
2024-02-12 11:47       ` Ilpo Järvinen
2024-03-20  8:33       ` Lukas Wunner
2023-10-03 14:39   ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-10-12  3:26     ` Alistair Francis
2023-10-12  4:37       ` Damien Le Moal
2023-10-12  7:16       ` Lukas Wunner
2023-10-12 15:09         ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-02-04 17:25     ` Lukas Wunner
2024-02-05 10:07       ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-10-06 20:34   ` Dan Williams
2023-09-28 17:32 ` [PATCH 08/12] PCI/CMA: Authenticate devices on enumeration Lukas Wunner
2023-10-03 14:47   ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-10-05 20:10   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2023-09-28 17:32 ` [PATCH 09/12] PCI/CMA: Validate Subject Alternative Name in certificates Lukas Wunner
2023-10-03 15:04   ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-10-05 14:04     ` Lukas Wunner
2023-10-05 20:09       ` Bjorn Helgaas
2023-09-28 17:32 ` [PATCH 10/12] PCI/CMA: Reauthenticate devices on reset and resume Lukas Wunner
2023-10-03 15:10   ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-09-28 17:32 ` [PATCH 11/12] PCI/CMA: Expose in sysfs whether devices are authenticated Lukas Wunner
2023-10-03  9:04   ` Ilpo Järvinen
2023-10-03 15:28   ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-10-05 20:20   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2023-09-28 17:32 ` [PATCH 12/12] PCI/CMA: Grant guests exclusive control of authentication Lukas Wunner
2023-10-03  9:12   ` Ilpo Järvinen
2023-10-03 15:40   ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-10-03 19:30     ` Lukas Wunner
2023-10-05 20:34       ` Bjorn Helgaas
2023-10-06  9:30       ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-10-18 19:58         ` Dan Williams
2023-10-19  7:58           ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2023-10-24 17:04             ` Dan Williams
2023-10-09 10:52   ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2023-10-09 14:02     ` Lukas Wunner
2023-10-06 16:06 ` [PATCH 00/12] PCI device authentication Dan Williams
2023-10-07 10:04   ` Lukas Wunner
2023-10-09 11:33     ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-10-09 13:49       ` Lukas Wunner
2023-10-10  4:07         ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2023-10-10  8:19           ` Lukas Wunner
2023-10-10 12:53             ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2023-10-11 16:57               ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-10-12  3:00                 ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2023-10-12 15:15                   ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-10-11 16:42           ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-10-12  9:15           ` Lukas Wunner
2023-10-12 11:18             ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2023-10-12 15:25               ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-10-12 13:13             ` Samuel Ortiz
2023-10-12 15:32               ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-10-13  5:03                 ` Samuel Ortiz
2023-10-13 11:45                   ` Alexey Kardashevskiy

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=df8c403791a588b97188bf0465426a270e3a4e6c.camel@wdc.com \
    --to=alistair.francis@wdc.com \
    --cc=Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com \
    --cc=aik@amd.com \
    --cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=dave.jiang@intel.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=david.e.box@intel.com \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
    --cc=graf@amazon.com \
    --cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
    --cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
    --cc=keyrings@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-coco@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxarm@huawei.com \
    --cc=lukas@wunner.de \
    --cc=ming4.li@intel.com \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
    --cc=wilfred.mallawa@wdc.com \
    --cc=zhi.a.wang@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).