From: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>
To: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, Iain Lane <iain@orangesquash.org.uk>,
Shyam-sundar S-k <Shyam-sundar.S-k@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 2/9] ACPI: Adjust #ifdef for *_lps0_dev use
Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2023 15:38:00 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e4a15547-0a84-429e-8047-f0ea7b1ad38d@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230816204143.66281-3-mario.limonciello@amd.com>
On 8/16/2023 1:41 PM, Mario Limonciello wrote:
> The #ifdef currently is guarded against CONFIG_X86, but these are
> actually sleep related functions so they should be tied to
> CONFIG_SUSPEND.
Explain why #ifdef and functions you are talking about clearly in the
commit log?
>
> Signed-off-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
> ---
> v11->v12:
> * change to CONFIG_SUSPEND
> v9->v10:
> * split from other patches
> ---
> include/linux/acpi.h | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/acpi.h b/include/linux/acpi.h
> index 0d5277b7c6323..f1552c04a2856 100644
> --- a/include/linux/acpi.h
> +++ b/include/linux/acpi.h
> @@ -1100,7 +1100,7 @@ void acpi_os_set_prepare_extended_sleep(int (*func)(u8 sleep_state,
>
> acpi_status acpi_os_prepare_extended_sleep(u8 sleep_state,
> u32 val_a, u32 val_b);
> -#ifdef CONFIG_X86
> +#if defined(CONFIG_SUSPEND) && defined(CONFIG_X86)
> struct acpi_s2idle_dev_ops {
> struct list_head list_node;
> void (*prepare)(void);
> @@ -1109,7 +1109,7 @@ struct acpi_s2idle_dev_ops {
> };
> int acpi_register_lps0_dev(struct acpi_s2idle_dev_ops *arg);
> void acpi_unregister_lps0_dev(struct acpi_s2idle_dev_ops *arg);
> -#endif /* CONFIG_X86 */
> +#endif /* CONFIG_SUSPEND && CONFIG_X86 */
> #ifndef CONFIG_IA64
> void arch_reserve_mem_area(acpi_physical_address addr, size_t size);
> #else
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-08-16 22:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-08-16 20:41 [PATCH v12 0/9] Fix wakeup problems on some AMD platforms Mario Limonciello
2023-08-16 20:41 ` [PATCH v12 1/9] ACPI: Add comments to clarify some #ifdef statements Mario Limonciello
2023-08-16 22:36 ` Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
2023-08-16 20:41 ` [PATCH v12 2/9] ACPI: Adjust #ifdef for *_lps0_dev use Mario Limonciello
2023-08-16 22:38 ` Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan [this message]
2023-08-16 20:41 ` [PATCH v12 3/9] ACPI: x86: s2idle: Post-increment variables when getting constraints Mario Limonciello
2023-08-17 2:42 ` Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
2023-08-17 10:10 ` Andy Shevchenko
2023-08-17 15:28 ` Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
2023-08-17 15:52 ` Andy Shevchenko
2023-08-16 20:41 ` [PATCH v12 4/9] ACPI: x86: s2idle: Catch multiple ACPI_TYPE_PACKAGE objects Mario Limonciello
2023-08-16 20:41 ` [PATCH v12 5/9] ACPI: x86: s2idle: Fix a logic error parsing AMD constraints table Mario Limonciello
2023-08-16 20:41 ` [PATCH v12 6/9] ACPI: x86: s2idle: Add more debugging for AMD constraints parsing Mario Limonciello
2023-08-16 20:41 ` [PATCH v12 7/9] ACPI: x86: s2idle: Store if constraint is enabled Mario Limonciello
2023-08-16 20:41 ` [PATCH v12 8/9] ACPI: x86: s2idle: Add for_each_lpi_constraint() helper Mario Limonciello
2023-08-16 20:41 ` [PATCH v12 9/9] ACPI: x86: s2idle: Enforce LPS0 constraints for PCI devices Mario Limonciello
2023-08-17 5:03 ` kernel test robot
2023-08-17 19:25 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2023-08-17 19:30 ` Limonciello, Mario
2023-08-17 19:37 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2023-08-17 19:40 ` Limonciello, Mario
2023-08-17 19:53 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2023-08-17 19:31 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e4a15547-0a84-429e-8047-f0ea7b1ad38d@linux.intel.com \
--to=sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com \
--cc=Shyam-sundar.S-k@amd.com \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
--cc=iain@orangesquash.org.uk \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mario.limonciello@amd.com \
--cc=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).