From: Ethan Zhao <haifeng.zhao@linux.intel.com>
To: Zhou Shengqing <zhoushengqing@ttyinfo.com>, helgaas@kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
lkp@intel.com, llvm@lists.linux.dev,
oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] Subject: PCI: Enable io space 1k granularity for intel cpu root port
Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2024 10:34:31 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e5c1990b-8c40-4376-bd9f-3701bf4eab91@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240723080403.9764-1-zhoushengqing@ttyinfo.com>
On 7/23/2024 4:04 PM, Zhou Shengqing wrote:
>> I think this has potential. Can you include a more complete citation
>> for the Intel spec? Complete name, document number if available,
>> revision, section? Hopefully it's publically available?
> Most of intel CPU EDS specs are under NDA. But you can refer to
> https://www.intel.com/content/dam/www/public/us/en/documents/datasheets/xeon-e5-v2-datasheet-vol-2.pdf
> keyword:"EN1K".
>
>> + /*
>>> + * Per intel sever CPU EDS vol2(register) spec,
>>> + * Intel Memory Map/Intel VT-d configuration space,
>>> + * IIO MISC Control (IIOMISCCTRL_1_5_0_CFG) — Offset 1C0h
>>> + * bit 2.
>>> + * Enable 1K (EN1K):
>>> + * This bit when set, enables 1K granularity for I/O space decode
>>> + * in each of the virtual P2P bridges
>>> + * corresponding to root ports, and DMI ports.
>>> + */
>>> + while ((d = pci_get_device(PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, 0x09a2, d))) {
>> To be safe, "d" (the [8086:09a2] device) should be on the same bus as
>> "dev" (with VMD, I think we get Root Ports *below* the VMD bridge,
>> which would be a different bus, and they presumably are not influenced
>> by the EN1K bit.
> I modified the code as follows, can you help me review it?
>
> /* Enable 1k I/O space granularity on the intel root port */
> static void quirk_intel_rootport_1k_io(struct pci_dev *dev)
> {
> struct pci_dev *d = NULL;
> u16 en1k = 0;
>
> if (!pci_is_pcie(dev) || pci_pcie_type(dev) != PCI_EXP_TYPE_ROOT_PORT)
> return;
>
> /*
> * Per intel sever CPU (ICX SPR GNR)EDS vol2(register) spec,
> * Intel Memory Map/Intel VT-d configuration space,
> * IIO MISC Control (IIOMISCCTRL_1_5_0_CFG) — Offset 1C0h
> * bit 2.
> * Enable 1K (EN1K):
> * This bit when set, enables 1K granularity for I/O space decode
> * in each of the virtual P2P bridges
> * corresponding to root ports, and DMI ports.
> */
> while ((d = pci_get_device(PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, 0x09a2, d))) {
> if (pci_domain_nr(d->bus) == pci_domain_nr(dev->bus)) {
Perhaps it is enough to check if the 0x09a2 VT-d and the rootport are on the smae bus
e.g. On my SPR, domain 0000
00:00.0 System peripheral: Intel Corporation Device 09a2 (rev 20)
00:0f.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation Device 1bbf (rev 10) (prog-if 00 [Normal decode])
15:00.0 System peripheral: Intel Corporation Device 09a2 (rev 20)
15:01.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation Device 352a (rev 04) (prog-if 00 [Normal decode])
and if you check domain number only, they might sit on different bus, perhaps that
would make thing complex, could you make sure the VT-d is on the upstream bus of the
bridge ?
Thanks,
Ethan
> pci_read_config_word(d, 0x1c0, &en1k);
> if (en1k & 0x4) {
> pci_info(dev, "1K I/O windows enabled per %s EN1K setting\n", pci_name(d));
> dev->io_window_1k = 1;
> }
> }
> }
> }
> DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_HEADER(PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, PCI_ANY_ID, quirk_intel_rootport_1k_io);
>
> If you have a better method, please let me know. If there are no issues,
> I can submit a new patch.
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-07-24 2:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-06-21 2:06 [PATCH] PCI: Enable io space 1k granularity for intel cpu root port Zhou Shengqing
2024-06-21 21:02 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2024-06-22 15:06 ` zhoushengqing
2024-06-22 17:52 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2024-06-23 2:26 ` Zhou Shengqing
2024-06-24 8:01 ` Zhou Shengqing
2024-06-26 8:27 ` kernel test robot
2024-06-26 10:09 ` kernel test robot
2024-06-26 11:19 ` [PATCH v2] [PATCH v2] " Zhou Shengqing
2024-06-26 15:26 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2024-06-27 0:58 ` [PATCH v3] " Zhou Shengqing
2024-06-29 21:34 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2024-06-30 2:52 ` Re: [PATCH] " Zhou Shengqing
2024-07-01 21:06 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2024-07-02 3:56 ` [PATCH v4] Subject: " Zhou Shengqing
2024-07-12 18:48 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2024-07-23 8:04 ` Zhou Shengqing
2024-07-24 2:34 ` Ethan Zhao [this message]
2024-07-24 3:38 ` Zhou Shengqing
2024-07-24 5:39 ` Ethan Zhao
2024-07-24 6:35 ` [PATCH v4] " Zhou Shengqing
2024-07-24 7:51 ` Ethan Zhao
2024-07-25 7:44 ` Zhou Shengqing
2024-07-26 2:27 ` Ethan Zhao
2024-07-02 5:49 ` Re: Re: [PATCH] PCI: Enable io space 1k granularity for Zhou Shengqing
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e5c1990b-8c40-4376-bd9f-3701bf4eab91@linux.intel.com \
--to=haifeng.zhao@linux.intel.com \
--cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=zhoushengqing@ttyinfo.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).