Linux PCI subsystem development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy  <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>
To: Smita Koralahalli <Smita.KoralahalliChannabasappa@amd.com>,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	oohall@gmail.com, Mahesh J Salgaonkar <mahesh@linux.ibm.com>,
	Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>,
	Yazen Ghannam <yazen.ghannam@amd.com>,
	Fontenot Nathan <Nathan.Fontenot@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] PCI: pciehp: Add support for async hotplug with native AER and DPC/EDR
Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2023 16:22:38 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <e7aa803b-2b43-dc43-1d92-38bcca636e62@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230621185152.105320-2-Smita.KoralahalliChannabasappa@amd.com>



On 6/21/23 11:51 AM, Smita Koralahalli wrote:
> According to Section 6.7.6 of PCIe Base Specification [1], async removal
> with DPC may result in surprise down error. This error is expected and
> is just a side-effect of async remove.
> 
> Add support to handle the surprise down error generated as a side-effect
> of async remove. Typically, this error is benign as the pciehp handler
> invoked by PDC or/and DLLSC alongside DPC, de-enumerates and brings down
> the device appropriately. But the error messages might confuse users. Get
> rid of these irritating log messages with a 1s delay while pciehp waits
> for dpc recovery.
> 
> The implementation is as follows: On an async remove a DPC is triggered
> along with a Presence Detect State change and/or DLL State Change.
> Determine it's an async remove by checking for DPC Trigger Status in DPC
> Status Register and Surprise Down Error Status in AER Uncorrected Error
> Status to be non-zero. If true, treat the DPC event as a side-effect of
> async remove, clear the error status registers and continue with hot-plug
> tear down routines. If not, follow the existing routine to handle AER and
> DPC errors.
> 
> Please note that, masking Surprise Down Errors was explored as an
> alternative approach, but left due to the odd behavior that masking only
> avoids the interrupt, but still records an error per PCIe r6.0.1 Section
> 6.2.3.2.2. That stale error is going to be reported the next time some
> error other than Surprise Down is handled.

I think this fix is applicable to the EDR code path as well.

> 
> Dmesg before:
> 
>   pcieport 0000:00:01.4: DPC: containment event, status:0x1f01 source:0x0000
>   pcieport 0000:00:01.4: DPC: unmasked uncorrectable error detected
>   pcieport 0000:00:01.4: PCIe Bus Error: severity=Uncorrected (Fatal), type=Transaction Layer, (Receiver ID)
>   pcieport 0000:00:01.4:   device [1022:14ab] error status/mask=00000020/04004000
>   pcieport 0000:00:01.4:    [ 5] SDES (First)
>   nvme nvme2: frozen state error detected, reset controller
>   pcieport 0000:00:01.4: DPC: Data Link Layer Link Active not set in 1000 msec
>   pcieport 0000:00:01.4: AER: subordinate device reset failed
>   pcieport 0000:00:01.4: AER: device recovery failed
>   pcieport 0000:00:01.4: pciehp: Slot(16): Link Down
>   nvme2n1: detected capacity change from 1953525168 to 0
>   pci 0000:04:00.0: Removing from iommu group 49
> 
> Dmesg after:
> 
>  pcieport 0000:00:01.4: pciehp: Slot(16): Link Down
>  nvme1n1: detected capacity change from 1953525168 to 0
>  pci 0000:04:00.0: Removing from iommu group 37
> 
> [1] PCI Express Base Specification Revision 6.0, Dec 16 2021.
>     https://members.pcisig.com/wg/PCI-SIG/document/16609
> 
> Signed-off-by: Smita Koralahalli <Smita.KoralahalliChannabasappa@amd.com>
> ---
> v2:
> 	Indentation is taken care. (Bjorn)
> 	Unrelevant dmesg logs are removed. (Bjorn)
> 	Rephrased commit message, to be clear on native vs FW-First
> 	handling. (Bjorn and Sathyanarayanan)
> 	Prefix changed from pciehp_ to dpc_. (Lukas)
> 	Clearing ARI and AtomicOp Requester are performed as a part of
> 	(de-)enumeration in pciehp_unconfigure_device(). (Lukas)
> 	Changed to clearing all optional capabilities in DEVCTL2.
> 	OS-First -> native. (Sathyanarayanan)
> 
> v3:
> 	Added error message when root port become inactive.
> 	Modified commit description to add more details.
> 	Rearranged code comments and function calls with no functional
> 	change.
> 	Additional check for is_hotplug_bridge.
> 	dpc_completed_waitqueue to wakeup pciehp handler.
> 	Cleared only Fatal error detected in DEVSTA.
> ---
>  drivers/pci/pcie/dpc.c | 58 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 58 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pcie/dpc.c b/drivers/pci/pcie/dpc.c
> index 3ceed8e3de41..5153ac8ea91c 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/pcie/dpc.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/pcie/dpc.c
> @@ -292,10 +292,68 @@ void dpc_process_error(struct pci_dev *pdev)
>  	}
>  }
>  
> +static void pci_clear_surpdn_errors(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> +{
> +	u16 reg16;
> +	u32 reg32;
> +
> +	pci_read_config_dword(pdev, pdev->dpc_cap + PCI_EXP_DPC_RP_PIO_STATUS, &reg32);
> +	pci_write_config_dword(pdev, pdev->dpc_cap + PCI_EXP_DPC_RP_PIO_STATUS, reg32);

It is not clear why you want to clear it.

> +
> +	pci_read_config_word(pdev, PCI_STATUS, &reg16);
> +	pci_write_config_word(pdev, PCI_STATUS, reg16);

Same as above. Can you add some comment about why you are clearing it?

> +
> +	pcie_capability_write_word(pdev, PCI_EXP_DEVSTA, PCI_EXP_DEVSTA_FED);
> +}
> +
> +static void dpc_handle_surprise_removal(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> +{
> +	if (pdev->dpc_rp_extensions && dpc_wait_rp_inactive(pdev)) {
> +		pci_err(pdev, "failed to retrieve DPC root port on async remove\n");
> +		goto out;
> +	}
> +
> +	pci_aer_raw_clear_status(pdev);
> +	pci_clear_surpdn_errors(pdev);
> +
> +	pci_write_config_word(pdev, pdev->dpc_cap + PCI_EXP_DPC_STATUS,
> +			      PCI_EXP_DPC_STATUS_TRIGGER);

Don't you need to wait for the link to go down?

> +
> +out:
> +	clear_bit(PCI_DPC_RECOVERED, &pdev->priv_flags);
> +	wake_up_all(&dpc_completed_waitqueue);
> +}
> +
> +static bool dpc_is_surprise_removal(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> +{
> +	u16 status;
> +
> +	pci_read_config_word(pdev, pdev->aer_cap + PCI_ERR_UNCOR_STATUS, &status);
> +
> +	if (!pdev->is_hotplug_bridge)
> +		return false;
> +
> +	if (!(status & PCI_ERR_UNC_SURPDN))
> +		return false;
> +
> +	return true;
> +}
> +
>  static irqreturn_t dpc_handler(int irq, void *context)
>  {
>  	struct pci_dev *pdev = context;
>  
> +	/*
> +	 * According to Section 6.7.6 of the PCIe Base Spec 6.0, since async
> +	 * removal might be unexpected, errors might be reported as a side
> +	 * effect of the event and software should handle them as an expected
> +	 * part of this event.
> +	 */
> +	if (dpc_is_surprise_removal(pdev)) {
> +		dpc_handle_surprise_removal(pdev);
> +		return IRQ_HANDLED;
> +	}
> +
>  	dpc_process_error(pdev);
>  
>  	/* We configure DPC so it only triggers on ERR_FATAL */

-- 
Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy
Linux Kernel Developer

  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-06-22 23:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-06-21 18:51 [PATCH v3 0/2] PCI: pciehp: Add support for native AER and DPC handling on async remove Smita Koralahalli
2023-06-21 18:51 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] PCI: pciehp: Add support for async hotplug with native AER and DPC/EDR Smita Koralahalli
2023-06-22  9:04   ` Lukas Wunner
2023-06-22 21:02     ` Smita Koralahalli
2023-06-22 21:22       ` Lukas Wunner
2023-06-22 23:22   ` Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy [this message]
2023-06-27 17:48     ` Smita Koralahalli
2023-06-28 13:29       ` Lukas Wunner
2023-06-21 18:51 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] PCI: pciehp: Clear the optional capabilities in DEVCTL2 on a hot-plug Smita Koralahalli
2023-06-22  6:31   ` Lukas Wunner
2023-06-22 10:04     ` Lukas Wunner
2023-06-22 21:02     ` Smita Koralahalli
2023-06-22 21:42       ` Lukas Wunner
2023-06-23  3:59         ` Felix Kuehling
2023-06-23  6:06           ` Lukas Wunner
2023-06-23 13:12         ` Jay Cornwall
2023-06-27 17:38         ` Smita Koralahalli
2023-06-28 13:25           ` Lukas Wunner
2023-07-01  6:29             ` Smita Koralahalli
2023-08-15 21:22             ` Smita Koralahalli

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=e7aa803b-2b43-dc43-1d92-38bcca636e62@linux.intel.com \
    --to=sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=Nathan.Fontenot@amd.com \
    --cc=Smita.KoralahalliChannabasappa@amd.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lukas@wunner.de \
    --cc=mahesh@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=oohall@gmail.com \
    --cc=yazen.ghannam@amd.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox