From: LeoLiuoc <LeoLiu-oc@zhaoxin.com>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
Cc: <rafael@kernel.org>, <lenb@kernel.org>, <james.morse@arm.com>,
<tony.luck@intel.com>, <bp@alien8.de>, <robert.moore@intel.com>,
<ying.huang@intel.com>, <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
<bhelgaas@google.com>, <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<devel@acpica.org>, <CobeChen@zhaoxin.com>,
<TonyWWang@zhaoxin.com>, <ErosZhang@zhaoxin.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/5] ACPI/PCI: Add AER bits #defines for PCIe to PCI/PCI-X Bridge
Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2023 17:49:55 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f3c4f38c-d45b-cf68-33e5-2e73dd73213d@zhaoxin.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230407232220.GA3830804@bhelgaas>
在 2023/4/8 7:22, Bjorn Helgaas 写道:
> Since this patch has nothing to do with ACPI, update subject line to:
>
> PCI: Add PCIe to PCI/PCI-X Bridge AER fields
>
Your description is more reasonable and I will update the header of this
patch later.
Yours sincerely,
Leoliu-oc
> On Tue, Nov 15, 2022 at 11:12:44AM +0800, LeoLiu-oc wrote:
>> From: leoliu-oc <leoliu-oc@zhaoxin.com>
>>
>> Define secondary uncorrectable error mask register, secondary
>> uncorrectable error severity register and secondary error capabilities and
>> control register bits in AER capability for PCIe to PCI/PCI-X Bridge.
>> Please refer to PCIe to PCI/PCI-X Bridge Specification, sec 5.2.3.2,
>> 5.2.3.3 and 5.2.3.4.
>
> Capitalize register names to match the spec usage.
>
Your suggestion is right, I'll update this in the next release.
Yours sincerely,
Leoliu-oc
>> Signed-off-by: leoliu-oc <leoliu-oc@zhaoxin.com>
>
> Assuming this goes along with a patch series that adds uses of these
> definitions:
>
> Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
>
>> ---
>> include/uapi/linux/pci_regs.h | 5 +++++
>> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/pci_regs.h b/include/uapi/linux/pci_regs.h
>> index 57b8e2ffb1dd..37f3baa336d7 100644
>> --- a/include/uapi/linux/pci_regs.h
>> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/pci_regs.h
>> @@ -799,6 +799,11 @@
>> #define PCI_ERR_ROOT_AER_IRQ 0xf8000000 /* Advanced Error Interrupt Message Number */
>> #define PCI_ERR_ROOT_ERR_SRC 0x34 /* Error Source Identification */
>>
>> +/* PCIe advanced error reporting extended capabilities for PCIe to PCI/PCI-X Bridge */
>> +#define PCI_ERR_UNCOR_MASK2 0x30 /* Secondary Uncorrectable Error Mask */
>> +#define PCI_ERR_UNCOR_SEVER2 0x34 /* Secondary Uncorrectable Error Severit */
>> +#define PCI_ERR_CAP2 0x38 /* Secondary Advanced Error Capabilities */
>
> Please squash these right up next to the other PCI_ERR_* definitions
> so it's obvious that they overlap PCI_ERR_ROOT_STATUS and
> PCI_ERR_ROOT_ERR_SRC (which is fine since one device can't have both),
> e.g.,
>
> #define PCI_ERR_ROOT_STATUS 0x30
> #define PCI_ERR_ROOT_COR_RCV 0x00000001 /* ERR_COR Received */
> ...
> #define PCI_ERR_ROOT_ERR_SRC 0x34 /* Error Source Identification */
> #define PCI_ERR_UNCOR_MASK2 0x30 /* PCIe to PCI/PCI-X bridge */
> #define PCI_ERR_UNCOR_SEVER2 0x34 /* PCIe to PCI/PCI-X bridge */
> #define PCI_ERR_CAP2 0x38 /* PCIe to PCI/PCI-X bridge */
>
I don't seem to understand what you mean. PCI_ERR_UNCOR_MASK2,
PCI_ERR_UNCOR_SEVER2, and PCI_ERR_CAP2 represent the control and
handling of individual errors that occur on traditional PCI or PCI-x
secondary bus interfaces, these registers are valid only for Bridge.
Although PCI_ERR_ROOT_ERR_SRC and PCI_ERR_UNCOR_SEVER2 have the same
value, they represent register definitions for different device types.
Yours sincerely,
Leoliu-oc
>> /* Virtual Channel */
>> #define PCI_VC_PORT_CAP1 0x04
>> #define PCI_VC_CAP1_EVCC 0x00000007 /* extended VC count */
>> --
>> 2.20.1
>>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-04-12 9:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-11-15 3:12 [PATCH v2 3/5] ACPI/PCI: Add AER bits #defines for PCIe to PCI/PCI-X Bridge LeoLiu-oc
2023-04-07 23:22 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2023-04-12 9:49 ` LeoLiuoc [this message]
2023-04-12 16:10 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2023-04-18 2:38 ` LeoLiuoc
2023-04-27 22:47 ` Bjorn Helgaas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f3c4f38c-d45b-cf68-33e5-2e73dd73213d@zhaoxin.com \
--to=leoliu-oc@zhaoxin.com \
--cc=CobeChen@zhaoxin.com \
--cc=ErosZhang@zhaoxin.com \
--cc=TonyWWang@zhaoxin.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=devel@acpica.org \
--cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
--cc=robert.moore@intel.com \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=ying.huang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox