From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.2 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 872A1ECDE43 for ; Fri, 19 Oct 2018 22:18:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D6B421476 for ; Fri, 19 Oct 2018 22:18:40 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="NtRcitnX" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 2D6B421476 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-pci-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726246AbeJTG0f (ORCPT ); Sat, 20 Oct 2018 02:26:35 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:50372 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726194AbeJTG0f (ORCPT ); Sat, 20 Oct 2018 02:26:35 -0400 Received: from [192.168.0.107] (cpe-174-109-247-98.nc.res.rr.com [174.109.247.98]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 626AB21470; Fri, 19 Oct 2018 22:18:38 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1539987518; bh=aPX7RujrvnBgREXg6x4urcIiuZQ5aWYMKNlWXdrreTw=; h=Subject:To:Cc:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=NtRcitnXu3qk4hHu8hey+P4is9SaDnsEXIIzRUGSbhI8Tzzg+FijGzcNOPALrvOmw 9cqdrLtW3eSVb+NKPelNvKJx6bzDGYdFxg/JvGB1EML+2LhCx7OW7hP9hbEdkWHHov 8a6nJoJQMTxiiXcdANEhjCYx0ePIBEX6817gR3bo= Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 3/7] PCI: Expose reset_type to users of pci_reset_function_locked() To: Bjorn Helgaas Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, Bjorn Helgaas References: <20181019021132.14743-1-okaya@kernel.org> <20181019021132.14743-3-okaya@kernel.org> <20181019202028.GB105697@bhelgaas-glaptop.roam.corp.google.com> From: Sinan Kaya Message-ID: Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2018 18:18:37 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20181019202028.GB105697@bhelgaas-glaptop.roam.corp.google.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-pci-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org On 10/19/2018 4:20 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: >> +int pci_reset_function_locked(struct pci_dev *dev, u32 reset_type); > There are no callers of this. Why are we updating it rather than > removing it? > I'll remove this function on another patch. I transition all __pci_reset_function_locked users to pci_reset_function_locked() first. Then all pci_reset_function_locked() users to pci_reset_function(). Then, git rid of pci_reset_function_locked() at last step.