From: Nitesh Narayan Lal <nitesh@redhat.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org,
frederic@kernel.org, mtosatti@redhat.com, juri.lelli@redhat.com,
abelits@marvell.com, bhelgaas@google.com,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, rostedt@goodmis.org, mingo@kernel.org,
tglx@linutronix.de, davem@davemloft.net,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, sfr@canb.auug.org.au,
stephen@networkplumber.org, rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [Patch v2 3/3] net: Restrict receive packets queuing to housekeeping CPUs
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2020 07:42:05 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f67187a8-be5f-ea15-77b4-165dab2b51af@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200623092312.GC4781@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 769 bytes --]
On 6/23/20 5:23 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 07:45:10PM -0400, Nitesh Narayan Lal wrote:
>> @@ -756,6 +757,13 @@ static ssize_t store_rps_map(struct netdev_rx_queue *queue,
>> return err;
>> }
>>
>> + hk_flags = HK_FLAG_DOMAIN | HK_FLAG_WQ;
>> + cpumask_and(mask, mask, housekeeping_cpumask(hk_flags));
>> + if (cpumask_weight(mask) == 0) {
> We have cpumask_empty() for that, which is a much more efficient way of
> testing the same.
Yes, right.
I will make this change.
>
>> + free_cpumask_var(mask);
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> + }
>> +
>> map = kzalloc(max_t(unsigned int,
>> RPS_MAP_SIZE(cpumask_weight(mask)), L1_CACHE_BYTES),
>> GFP_KERNEL);
>> --
>> 2.18.4
>>
--
Thanks
Nitesh
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-06-23 11:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-06-22 23:45 [PATCH v2 0/3] Preventing job distribution to isolated CPUs Nitesh Narayan Lal
2020-06-22 23:45 ` [Patch v2 1/3] lib: Restrict cpumask_local_spread to houskeeping CPUs Nitesh Narayan Lal
2020-06-23 9:21 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-06-23 13:18 ` Nitesh Narayan Lal
2020-06-22 23:45 ` [Patch v2 2/3] PCI: Restrict probe functions to housekeeping CPUs Nitesh Narayan Lal
2020-06-22 23:45 ` [Patch v2 3/3] net: Restrict receive packets queuing " Nitesh Narayan Lal
2020-06-23 9:23 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-06-23 11:42 ` Nitesh Narayan Lal [this message]
2020-06-23 1:03 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] Preventing job distribution to isolated CPUs Nitesh Narayan Lal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f67187a8-be5f-ea15-77b4-165dab2b51af@redhat.com \
--to=nitesh@redhat.com \
--cc=abelits@marvell.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
--cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox