From: "Ilpo Järvinen" <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
To: Steve Oswald <stevepeter.oswald@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [BUG] Thunderbolt eGPU PCI BARs incorrectly assigned, fails to assign memory
Date: Mon, 1 Sep 2025 18:50:27 +0300 (EEST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f743efbe-56b7-ad85-f278-743af9385f10@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9254be77-46ea-992f-a1bd-98bea3943520@linux.intel.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4666 bytes --]
On Mon, 1 Sep 2025, Ilpo Järvinen wrote:
> On Sun, 31 Aug 2025, Steve Oswald wrote:
>
> > I’ve encountered an issue with Thunderbolt eGPU (externally connected
> > gpu via thunderbolt 4). The change from kernel 6.10.14 to 6.11.0 broke
> > the pci memory assignment of the external pcie device. I figured out
> > which version broke it by using ubuntu 25.04 and downgrading the
> > kernel (https://raw.githubusercontent.com/pimlie/ubuntu-mainline-kernel.sh/master/ubuntu-mainline-kernel.sh).
> >
> > >From the dmesg output, on the broken 6.11.0 I see 'failed to assign'.
> > The issue occurs (almost never) on previous kernel version 6.10.14.
> > Using pci=realloc did not change the behavior (I can produce the dmesg
> > output if necessary).
> >
> > The issue was tested with 2 egpus (Radeon Instinct MI50 32GB, NVIDIA
> > 3080 10GB). Both the amd and the nvidia driver fail to initialize the
> > device because they cannot write the pcie messages.
> >
> > System details:
> > - Kernel: Linux 6.10.14-061014-generic (Ubuntu build) > 6.11.0-061100
> > - Laptop: TUXEDO InfinityBook Pro 16 - Gen8 with Thunderbolt 4
> > - eGPU: Radeon Instinct MI50 32GB, NVIDIA 3080 10GB
> >
> > Steps to reproduce:
> > 1. Boot the system with the eGPU.
> > 2. Observe PCI BAR message in `dmesg`.
> >
> > Logs:
> > both kernel messages, lspci can be found here:
> > https://gist.github.com/stepeos/cd060c7d66ab195f51ab4d5675b4e4af
> > raw files:
> > - dmesg_linux_6.11.0.log
> > https://gist.githubusercontent.com/stepeos/cd060c7d66ab195f51ab4d5675b4e4af/raw/f9470a06ff929d386c50ec6b5d07e0ff3f053dcf/dmesg_linux_6.11.0.log
> > - dmesg_linux_6.10.14.log
> > https://gist.githubusercontent.com/stepeos/cd060c7d66ab195f51ab4d5675b4e4af/raw/f9470a06ff929d386c50ec6b5d07e0ff3f053dcf/dmesg_linux_6.10.14.log
> >
> > If additional info is needed, I'm happy to help.
>
> Hi Steve,
>
> Thanks for the report.
>
> My analysis is that the problem boils down to lack of this line with 6.11:
>
> pcieport 0000:00:07.0: resource 15 [mem 0x6000000000-0x601bffffff 64bit pref] released
>
> It means one of the upstream bridge windows could not be released for
> resize as it is printed from pci_reassign_bridge_resources() which likely
> occurs inside pci_resize_resource() call from amdgpu(?).
>
> The very likely cause is this check:
>
> /* Ignore BARs which are still in use */
> if (res->child)
> continue;
>
> ...which (until very recently) is entirely silent so there's no warning
> whatsover what is the root cause.
Hi again,
Actually, scratch most of that. It's not during resize as the log should
say "releasing" (I don't know how I got this confused). "released" is from
pci_bridge_release_resources() which is called from
pci_bus_release_bridge_resources() doesn't even try to walk upwards.
But that begs question, why didn't also the bridge windows fail their
assignments.
Resource fitting calculates size for the bridge window:
pci 0000:03:00.0: bridge window [mem 0x800000000-0x10003fffff 64bit pref] to [bus 04-2c] add_size 100000 add_align 100000
...but I cannot see assignment for that even being attempted as almost
immediately, this occurs:
pci 0000:03:00.0: bridge window [mem 0x6000000000-0x601bffffff 64bit pref]: assigned
...which is much less than 0x10003fffff-0x800000000. I cannot think of
anything what could make it shrink like that.
I'll have to think this more, it might require a debug patch but I'll
think until tomorrow to see if I can understand it from the code alone.
> What this means, is that there's some assigned resource underneath
> 0000:00:07.0 with 6.11 that wasn't there with 6.10. And it is because 6.11
> tried harder to get your resources assigned and was successful here and
> there resulting in pinning the bridge window in its place, whereas 6.10
> failed to assign the same resource.
>
> Could you provide /proc/iomem (it's enough to do that for 6.11 for now)?
>
>
> You could try to use hpmmioprefsize= on kernel's command line to reserve
> more space for the bridge windows, the default is only 2M and these GPUs
> need a magnitude more (gigabytes), you can check from 6.10 what the sizes
> of the BARs on the GPU are, and round the sum upwards to the next power of
> two multiple.
>
> I'd also be interested to see why pci=realloc failed to solve this problem
> as it should reconfigure the entire resource tree so if you could provide
> the logs with that. Please take lspci with -vvv.
>
>
>
--
i.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-09-01 15:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-08-31 10:51 [BUG] Thunderbolt eGPU PCI BARs incorrectly assigned, fails to assign memory Steve Oswald
2025-09-01 13:25 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2025-09-01 15:50 ` Ilpo Järvinen [this message]
2025-09-01 16:06 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2025-09-01 16:18 ` Steve Oswald
2025-09-01 16:28 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2025-09-03 13:09 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2025-10-08 10:43 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2025-10-11 14:12 ` Steve Oswald
2025-11-07 16:22 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2025-09-01 16:10 ` Steve Oswald
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f743efbe-56b7-ad85-f278-743af9385f10@linux.intel.com \
--to=ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stevepeter.oswald@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox