From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 06C3E30EF65 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2026 17:54:07 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.133.124 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1768240449; cv=none; b=lw7/iDU4sfMAnPeV6H3MVusi5ZISQxChU+jaaudKFAeUkhOuc13cQK/eIJwJm/csK7+K9adwhJnFvSGhNbSLM8e8hPT2kxjjdtbVmywnS30rJR3fvcq4XS9AE+s8thFk+KLF7xuu7VTRtpBUyulvy3IW7N7DbuhHlfrp/lqmhaw= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1768240449; c=relaxed/simple; bh=69fqmCRd2Tf1nBFL5gD9s9xWKdbIFwrikt2C7UGqOuQ=; h=From:Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=dr55Bc/ByW8G8rOaSJcngrPJtv64At7xlC4zyRPg79w2MnZttKaC7S0tD8bUTaUpNm9KsxBl+ncgbUwCYjf/Kj/bhaxLJQ/U3L+SxEYeizskFKCeNQ8fUGmtAXyr211DD7yPWRyMYB6/9ANYkPz2eonPxZB1Ip7SecDNDLGPCho= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=redhat.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b=UT+GrsaV; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b=ZMS+qKWM; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.133.124 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="UT+GrsaV"; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="ZMS+qKWM" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1768240447; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=9TjQuHk6AbSuF3wU6pHO95OUHC0x3l8Lsr+qaj6DcQU=; b=UT+GrsaVKKGYw2mDPmf6/Q1PFpQKUeE+e+g+3JU8Yi1VbR1tg53QrXHaVoFN4x2jVr2Xy6 08ITeB4JdRSzOd6af2E1EZBrQNq6jhNQQOpBdBko5jT0GJLPijWPfwbZY5lo3lIBnGMU9K /8ClP6bdNLEU6TEa+C9//Qk7wTsbrNI= Received: from mail-ua1-f71.google.com (mail-ua1-f71.google.com [209.85.222.71]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-472-DDE7z4LNOIiz6cnu6mpnbA-1; Mon, 12 Jan 2026 12:54:06 -0500 X-MC-Unique: DDE7z4LNOIiz6cnu6mpnbA-1 X-Mimecast-MFC-AGG-ID: DDE7z4LNOIiz6cnu6mpnbA_1768240444 Received: by mail-ua1-f71.google.com with SMTP id a1e0cc1a2514c-9426773a207so20165818241.3 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2026 09:54:05 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=google; t=1768240444; x=1768845244; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:content-language:references :cc:to:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id:from:from:to :cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=9TjQuHk6AbSuF3wU6pHO95OUHC0x3l8Lsr+qaj6DcQU=; b=ZMS+qKWMbzAgtiOZ95b5b8ACdWzxM4x9sBM6AmZ6omRt50avcKiYgnQFchcpczNi0Z 5wbcfi+GqGL/W+H44x189kjMmOu7+H/AKjM3mNtITG67PLv+TFc01DsJqq9a7X9SM2MO CN29O8bEx0OT+bQ4FLWb7gwWLUy2HQvqIf4cZZm+wfPJe5q8mEUU9T0iKe55/50Uj940 a/9u5REydn/+V679XfJfgbVn1/e4uh3vOCEtUkSs/wcKdHEBMU4XdFN6iBFcddrF5bV2 zYt3Gc2e31k9oYfQHjWTkgFWX6atHOwgpiDIPcVTI6H8i7s1pGIryuHitaOy0fi0WK30 bHpw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1768240444; x=1768845244; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:content-language:references :cc:to:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id:from:x-gm-gg :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=9TjQuHk6AbSuF3wU6pHO95OUHC0x3l8Lsr+qaj6DcQU=; b=MrBO34V66Yk0kak4e9P7K3jC85Z8lJrnYjwinysSz+cFteZ8jHAM0gGx1O7t7PaqSo 9OQL6wQ2G4CLlS50Kcuh1ZgynEJ3Z6aim45bBYd1qBIzRSH8YUNmuBBSqIKHJANPcCu0 iyDNBFdrKAmBjzbf0guAGszkUm/9/NzlmpXww2zQ/UxVE1kCRgEVTrvWE3GX8Wi3gldq vIFS4Xqe4yUxTSZTgeZxR1YxfJml5ApONpkl20YMfQcVlJRRe21vpvBb1vNVbhLe4t4x p6wp6VdOsVSydQvMwG8s2NrvC7pCrNlKTZpdemY3MIYaoxNUQjhCI4tPufk1Jx4lcDT3 afMg== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCU+E79TkBLUfZUITaJ6k/PJBvYl6xaT/CDR9DGKBjNpi/mMYF7nLfxIFmCqCICYfR2ehagj9wEixaQ=@vger.kernel.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YyxBemDLj21JWXXl2WkkvqMKLGhLVGzjma7U1h+w8PwDUCA5UQm I1xKoogXhqG/48q+B+jK4o2+Y/1O4T+27UIviDAVHd5GruSvSgYVwxgiic3ZxRWbQrWeFPsla/b g+S/Uah1eR08dj1N+YOQII/m6A8wC9W0W4pbzt4eQH9X6xw9OhxLUaA6wHVMbkw== X-Gm-Gg: AY/fxX5I7bQ8e3WwYc/V1SEMQbhls4QXnlvZ2hxEiz63wUdNxFDg8BWjnfMFe4mEPLJ ZL3NiDMhffh6b8+9IJTmsLmb8bgaINQsgPRW1yh2SoK9InlXI+M0snENPGmW/wkwDqrwIE0/MOW TCVInRayA/Eyu6kVgpxo6jseJcpHJ3ma6iAigRPv9M8BbuvDhMpGhp/Q3HXM56GV1rTf5A1EZHe zMS2uZvcPUy231NQ4GF+10MYYpxgF/g8Qz18dtilNQDSbCRGdz6N79I9aeSG6NWRLnQ7MW+2JDS otzxnwxVOodmkXLc+rn8NuP3lD+vLJWNqnzDnd7BjS2jOw5z0bL0rFqOkezfHhyDGPPK8a+p6wB 3ang03UIsF+MOXh897ZIuw0VxBVw+gh6Orq7zK3eQa3aupf9pkQyJJUiz X-Received: by 2002:a05:6122:4f88:b0:563:8335:9ab7 with SMTP id 71dfb90a1353d-5638335b3d9mr1837506e0c.19.1768240444525; Mon, 12 Jan 2026 09:54:04 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHxwLoMJ4ylgMx4yokJUFTrQvglGoUK2cQ8cuwE9wOBcOJlyALmmG0hMGzOjgHwYtiz9Ob2mA== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6122:4f88:b0:563:8335:9ab7 with SMTP id 71dfb90a1353d-5638335b3d9mr1837491e0c.19.1768240444039; Mon, 12 Jan 2026 09:54:04 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?IPV6:2601:188:c102:b180:1f8b:71d0:77b1:1f6e? ([2601:188:c102:b180:1f8b:71d0:77b1:1f6e]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 71dfb90a1353d-5634ca16da7sm15469803e0c.17.2026.01.12.09.53.51 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 12 Jan 2026 09:54:03 -0800 (PST) From: Waiman Long X-Google-Original-From: Waiman Long Message-ID: Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2026 12:53:49 -0500 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/33] cpuset: Provide lockdep check for cpuset lock held To: Frederic Weisbecker , LKML Cc: =?UTF-8?Q?Michal_Koutn=C3=BD?= , Andrew Morton , Bjorn Helgaas , Catalin Marinas , Chen Ridong , Danilo Krummrich , "David S . Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Gabriele Monaco , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Ingo Molnar , Jakub Kicinski , Jens Axboe , Johannes Weiner , Lai Jiangshan , Marco Crivellari , Michal Hocko , Muchun Song , Paolo Abeni , Peter Zijlstra , Phil Auld , "Rafael J . Wysocki" , Roman Gushchin , Shakeel Butt , Simon Horman , Tejun Heo , Thomas Gleixner , Vlastimil Babka , Will Deacon , cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org References: <20260101221359.22298-1-frederic@kernel.org> <20260101221359.22298-13-frederic@kernel.org> Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On 1/11/26 8:43 PM, Waiman Long wrote: > On 1/1/26 5:13 PM, Frederic Weisbecker wrote: >> cpuset modifies partitions, including isolated, while holding the cpuset >> mutex. >> >> This means that holding the cpuset mutex is safe to synchronize against >> housekeeping cpumask changes. >> >> Provide a lockdep check to validate that. >> >> Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker >> --- >>   include/linux/cpuset.h | 2 ++ >>   kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c | 7 +++++++ >>   2 files changed, 9 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/include/linux/cpuset.h b/include/linux/cpuset.h >> index a98d3330385c..1c49ffd2ca9b 100644 >> --- a/include/linux/cpuset.h >> +++ b/include/linux/cpuset.h >> @@ -18,6 +18,8 @@ >>   #include >>   #include >>   +extern bool lockdep_is_cpuset_held(void); >> + >>   #ifdef CONFIG_CPUSETS >>     /* >> diff --git a/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c b/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c >> index 3afa72f8d579..5e2e3514c22e 100644 >> --- a/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c >> +++ b/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c >> @@ -283,6 +283,13 @@ void cpuset_full_unlock(void) >>       cpus_read_unlock(); >>   } >>   +#ifdef CONFIG_LOCKDEP >> +bool lockdep_is_cpuset_held(void) >> +{ >> +    return lockdep_is_held(&cpuset_mutex); >> +} >> +#endif >> + >>   static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(callback_lock); >>     void cpuset_callback_lock_irq(void) > > The cgroup/for-next tree already have a similar > lockdep_assert_cpuset_lock_held() defined. So you can drop this patch > if this series won't land in the next merge window. Sorry, the other new lockdep API isn't exactly the same as what you propose here. So it is not a replacement for your use case. Sorry for the noise. Cheers, Longman