From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48F23318BBD; Wed, 7 Jan 2026 21:47:12 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1767822433; cv=none; b=nt1crVQ5Gw8WyNx7vziRnWl9K17d5GG9Q5MZmGKZdp79V1Y6Fen1IABq8m5WXugw87EaVFEY18zXLlvLMbr54aZI10giajDQI6J8Wh3vA359XqIAQ0H8zoQNmWK1ZC0qRda5KLWZLXqLun35Aj+Vw6Bo+WwoRf7mRbvS/TIkUPY= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1767822433; c=relaxed/simple; bh=SAlipT1fP7kIO0IvVZ5VIq5XK5ijLK54y/2EHpkDTik=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=WI4GPmjgJnBjQeholVf6zylpuZlIGuejblZpQK/plPuzdCrMX4uAbH2iZVa0dkv2H/j6qMmKYbS0b2mPmsl3+9MsDhH949mOj+JURqgblfXeISehCUTvKUdZW+T8d9sXBuBzHrzltcNUTcLMeyV5Tm8F0WhSRHAF+uZFtPCX/Ns= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=ncaiadvN; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="ncaiadvN" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 32DB5C4CEF1; Wed, 7 Jan 2026 21:47:12 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1767822432; bh=SAlipT1fP7kIO0IvVZ5VIq5XK5ijLK54y/2EHpkDTik=; h=Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To:From; b=ncaiadvNMNgwCq2etZbPL7Yh/XkEH1LVA3IP5mGMwq3AYIYMqRkQ2VAnmo+a9NggV ZQuugN1q6RcIXxfiq854uVFj54uovBoQwkShaQQrkdFWiBA+r9D7MSUIZ7dkexUVdz lHi/I9c7voYq8KMMlp5fwyCcJ6EXsQA+S2CMF72DRfELZf86LyfvYdJjTVm0ASwd6Z uy5DWOjSI0bbIyMvC/u/Ct+oantqBvX719NcjUZST+RvFhf8KwwIaW218jwv7+rclk jk0MtBTLcKA6Jnmlj/TT5VEA8DHDD6KHU9COpEQJiY40AbAtNlB6Ogh37c3WkEchr4 EGnSTSxBB9qxA== Message-ID: Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2026 15:47:11 -0600 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/2] Revise some PCI _DSM method implement To: Zhou Shengqing , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Bjorn Helgaas Cc: Len Brown , linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20250605065814.41298-1-zhoushengqing@ttyinfo.com> Content-Language: en-US From: Mario Limonciello In-Reply-To: <20250605065814.41298-1-zhoushengqing@ttyinfo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 6/5/25 1:58 AM, Zhou Shengqing wrote: > [1/2]PCI/ACPI: Add rev 2 check for PRESERVE_BOOT_CONFIG function > [2/2]PCI/ACPI: Add acpi_check_dsm() for PCI _DSM definitions > > drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c | 58 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------- > 1 file changed, 44 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) Did this series get overlooked? I was talking to someone about this _DSM and noticed it on lore. It looks reasonable to me. The only thing that jumped out to me that I would say is that the tag Fixes: 9d7d5db8e78e ("PCI: Move PRESERVE_BOOT_CONFIG _DSM evaluation to pci_re") Shouldn't be below the cutlist, it should be above it. If there are no other concerns maybe Bjorn can just fix that while committing though. Reviewed-by: Mario Limonciello (AMD)