From: poza@codeaurora.org
To: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
Cc: Bharat Kumar Gogada <bharat.kumar.gogada@xilinx.com>,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
bhelgaas@google.com, rgummal@xilinx.com,
linux-pci-owner@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] PCI/AER: Enable SERR# forwarding in non ACPI flow
Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2018 11:40:02 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <fce5d2e4e32b424f41f79782cf447304@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180905201047.GQ107892@bhelgaas-glaptop.roam.corp.google.com>
On 2018-09-06 01:40, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 09, 2018 at 08:41:27PM +0530, poza@codeaurora.org wrote:
>> On 2018-08-09 20:27, Bharat Kumar Gogada wrote:
>> > As per Figure 6-3 in PCIe r4.0, sec 6.2.6, ERR_ messages
>> > will be forwarded from the secondary interface to the primary interface,
>> > if the SERR# Enable bit in the Bridge Control register is set.
>> > Currently PCI_BRIDGE_CTL_SERR is being enabled only in
>> > ACPI flow.
>> > This patch enables PCI_BRIDGE_CTL_SERR for Type-1 PCI device.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Bharat Kumar Gogada <bharat.kumar.gogada@xilinx.com>
>> > ---
>> > drivers/pci/pcie/aer.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++
>> > 1 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>> >
>> > diff --git a/drivers/pci/pcie/aer.c b/drivers/pci/pcie/aer.c
>> > index a2e8838..4fb0d24 100644
>> > --- a/drivers/pci/pcie/aer.c
>> > +++ b/drivers/pci/pcie/aer.c
>> > @@ -343,6 +343,20 @@ int pci_enable_pcie_error_reporting(struct pci_dev
>> > *dev)
>> > if (!dev->aer_cap)
>> > return -EIO;
>> >
>> > + if (dev->hdr_type == PCI_HEADER_TYPE_BRIDGE) {
>> > + u16 control;
>> > +
>> > + /*
>> > + * A Type-1 PCI bridge will not forward ERR_ messages coming
>> > + * from an endpoint if SERR# forwarding is not enabled.
>> > + */
>> > + pci_read_config_word(dev, PCI_BRIDGE_CONTROL, &control);
>> > + if (!(control & PCI_BRIDGE_CTL_SERR)) {
>> > + control |= PCI_BRIDGE_CTL_SERR;
>> > + pci_write_config_word(dev, PCI_BRIDGE_CONTROL, control);
>> > + }
>> > + }
>> > +
>> > return pcie_capability_set_word(dev, PCI_EXP_DEVCTL,
>> > PCI_EXP_AER_FLAGS);
>> > }
>> > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pci_enable_pcie_error_reporting);
>> > @@ -352,6 +366,15 @@ int pci_disable_pcie_error_reporting(struct pci_dev
>> > *dev)
>> > if (pcie_aer_get_firmware_first(dev))
>> > return -EIO;
>> >
>> > + if (dev->hdr_type == PCI_HEADER_TYPE_BRIDGE) {
>> > + u16 control;
>> > +
>> > + /* Clear SERR Forwarding */
>> > + pci_read_config_word(dev, PCI_BRIDGE_CONTROL, &control);
>> > + control &= ~PCI_BRIDGE_CTL_SERR;
>> > + pci_write_config_word(dev, PCI_BRIDGE_CONTROL, control);
>> > + }
>> > +
>> > return pcie_capability_clear_word(dev, PCI_EXP_DEVCTL,
>> > PCI_EXP_AER_FLAGS);
>> > }
>>
>>
>> Hi Bjorn,
>>
>> I made some comments on patchv1., same I am putting it across here.
>>
>> what about hot-plug case ?
>> should not aer_init() call pci_enable_pcie_error_reporting() for all
>> the downstream pci_dev ?
>> and remove all the calls from drivers..
>> aer_init will be called for each device (pci_dev) while pciehp does
>> re-enumeration.
>> so probable we might want to call pci_enable_pcie_error_reporting()
>> but that dictates the design where AER framework is taking decision to
>> enable error reporting on behalf of drivers as well.
>> but thats fine I think, if drivers do not want to participate then
>> they have
>> to call pci_disable_pcie_error_reporting explicitly.
>> does this make sense ?
>
> I just replied to the original patch; sorry, I forgot to add you to
> the cc list. Bharat, when people respond to your v<N> patch, can you
> please add them (and anybody else *they* added) to the cc list when
> you post your v<N+1> patch?
>
> If we set PCI_BRIDGE_CTL_SERR in the pci_configure_device() path,
> would that address your comments?
yes, that should do.
>
> There's still a separate question of where and how we should configure
> the error bits in PCI_EXP_DEVCTL (currently done in
> pci_enable_pcie_error_reporting()).
>
> Bjorn
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-09-10 6:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-08-09 14:57 [PATCH v2] PCI/AER: Enable SERR# forwarding in non ACPI flow Bharat Kumar Gogada
2018-08-09 15:11 ` poza
2018-08-24 12:13 ` Bharat Kumar Gogada
2018-09-05 20:10 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2018-09-10 6:10 ` poza [this message]
2018-09-05 20:04 ` Bjorn Helgaas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=fce5d2e4e32b424f41f79782cf447304@codeaurora.org \
--to=poza@codeaurora.org \
--cc=bharat.kumar.gogada@xilinx.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci-owner@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rgummal@xilinx.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).