From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:46397 "EHLO plane.gmane.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753232AbcBXTkK (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Feb 2016 14:40:10 -0500 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aYfI4-0007sU-Kl for linux-pci@vger.kernel.org; Wed, 24 Feb 2016 20:40:05 +0100 Received: from 96-94-100-129-static.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([96-94-100-129-static.hfc.comcastbusiness.net]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 24 Feb 2016 20:40:04 +0100 Received: from akshay.bhat by 96-94-100-129-static.hfc.comcastbusiness.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 24 Feb 2016 20:40:04 +0100 To: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org From: Akshay Bhat Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] PCI: imx6: add dt prop for link gen, default to gen1 Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2016 19:35:55 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: References: <1446735481-27326-1-git-send-email-tharvey@gateworks.com> <1447942365-11662-1-git-send-email-tharvey@gateworks.com> <20151125231435.GI8869@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-pci-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Tim Harvey gateworks.com> writes: > >> > >> Is there some sort of DT or OF spec that lists "max-link-speed" as a > >> generic property? I see Lucas' desire to have this be common across > >> DesignWare PCIe cores. Should it be moved up a level even from there, > >> i.e., to bindings/pci/pci.txt? > > > > Bjorn, > > > > I don't know what the general consensus is here. As your the PCI > > maintainer I would leave that up to you. Are there other platforms > > that need to link at a lesser capability than the host controller is > > capable of? I am only aware of the IMX6 and SPEAr13XX [1] > > > > I can make that change and re-submit if you feel that is necessary. > > > > Bjorn, > > Any thoughts here? I would really like to see this get picked up > sooner rather than later. > > Regards, > > Tim > Bjorn, It looks like there was no further follow-up on this patch. Could you kindly provide feedback to Tim's question? We have multiple i.MX boards that could use this patch to resolve PCIe issues. Thanks, Akshay