From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B0F2E47140C; Fri, 9 Oct 2026 07:33:53 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1791531234; cv=none; b=Nep7cpNrfqbs+tx/jYPQIlt/PyrcN0IbKHo9rZ+W5Ijn99BkEO/GFF20kWVTHrfG2F66mM2bHM7WZ01mgD1uWfsqc2fwGXnmk/6cFXrJlclSCuLD6NeVZcNpJaggvegfOJe9ODRPTHX5OJ1yhyzL0xA2Pr7INdtyBu3l6bvO50Y= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1791531234; c=relaxed/simple; bh=1WXTQ9ZxVaYyZuDgfL7CKr4uu13H/OKfPUt9cZ7+qik=; h=Message-ID:From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type: Date; b=YrvszJNP4Vi13I+PEAJ97mrXptj0jda2a9vkx0kqMMRV162U8P3zFq3eP5n+PiUMqrajtmCOh56t5wwvnqBVjYHyLp2jXVuarbVtJXlxn2RtoHoiB38zv9pVwfFb2rvB3rrFwxAAu9eNcsEWFECbHW+Pkyb/ArQT8FdaqAoOkhE= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=ZGwrjur6; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="ZGwrjur6" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 423DE1F000FF; Fri, 9 Oct 2026 07:33:53 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1791531233; bh=1WXTQ9ZxVaYyZuDgfL7CKr4uu13H/OKfPUt9cZ7+qik=; h=From:Subject:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Date; b=ZGwrjur6akTThFC5EdJEzrwefdtyeE7QJ5Xxqf1D91eexy1DpBSLIJXAaT9zG0x7e 2G6oTvOF9jjyuH61sE1+bWCkpM8adUOkgwC9v+ga9XXbjEBR3ENWV+Jvr/p19b7ckP GWUBTNDqi0REeqhIoIfurN6cg3PH4CBa16Mgk8lAe3B7YFwCMpljzy7htkmR4exi6t InVWTGWFM1gWtf2viVY0TzIB3UYX6aq6hmfrm+wdOCOIVYIDwjyLTiZxCbup8zEbNY 7N1jkwpBbKKaO9fW3NPHfqwprNdF//ypLurkaxHyyngchF+FZSk+HjOQlame4olyQ9 1AjZuoQBxF2Fw== Message-ID: From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] PCI: of: Correct pci_set_of_node() return value documentation Reply-To: sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev To: "Xilin Wu" Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, robh@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20261009-pci-of-disabled-bridges-v1-1-08708f9e1802@radxa.com> References: <20261009-pci-of-disabled-bridges-v1-0-08708f9e1802@radxa.com> <20261009-pci-of-disabled-bridges-v1-1-08708f9e1802@radxa.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Fri, 09 Oct 2026 07:33:52 +0000 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: > Commit 1a8c251cff20 ("PCI: move OF status =3D "disabled" detection to > dev->match_driver") removed the availability check from pci_set_of_node(). > The function now returns 0 even when the device is disabled in the device > tree, but its kernel-doc still says that it can return -ENODEV. >=20 > Remove the stale -ENODEV description and use the kernel-doc Return: > heading for the return value. >=20 > Signed-off-by: Xilin Wu Sashiko has reviewed this patch and found no issues. It looks great! --=20 Sashiko AI review =C2=B7 https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261009-pci-of-dis= abled-bridges-v1-0-08708f9e1802@radxa.com?part=3D1