From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Alexander Gruhlke" <gruhlke@mailbox.org>
Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] PCI: Don't treat ~0 as ready in pci_dev_wait() with RRS SV
Date: Sun, 11 Oct 2026 16:41:42 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-167316@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261011163249.18479-3-gruhlke@mailbox.org>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Medium] pci: premature wait termination for VFs returning ~0 under RRS SV
--
commit 3101a5ea075ba619cd03d971d4a538bf4788ec75
Author: Alexander Gruhlke <gruhlke@mailbox.org>
PCI: Don't treat ~0 as ready in pci_dev_wait() with RRS SV
With RRS Software Visibility, pci_dev_wait() considers a device ready as
soon as reading the Vendor ID doesn't return the RRS value. Devices
aren't required to respond with RRS while they aren't ready, so the read
may return ~0 and pci_dev_wait() stops waiting too early.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250611101442.387378-1-hui.wang@canonical.com
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci.c b/drivers/pci/pci.c
> index aa39b4dd45aea..cf429f64bce0f 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/pci.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/pci.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -1331,7 +1332,8 @@ static int pci_dev_wait(struct pci_dev *dev, char *reset_type, int timeout)
>
> if (root && root->config_rrs_sv) {
> pci_read_config_dword(dev, PCI_VENDOR_ID, &id);
> - if (!pci_bus_rrs_vendor_id(id))
> + if (!pci_bus_rrs_vendor_id(id) &&
> + (!PCI_POSSIBLE_ERROR(id) || dev->is_virtfn))
> break;
[Severity: Medium]
Does this cause pci_dev_wait() to exit prematurely for Virtual Functions
(VFs) that return ~0 under Configuration RRS Software Visibility?
If a VF is not yet ready, its config space might return ~0 (for example, due
to a Request Timeout) instead of the RRS value. The dev->is_virtfn check
causes the wait loop to terminate immediately upon seeing ~0. This seems to
allow unready VFs to appear ready, defeating the reset delay.
Callers might then attempt to initialize the unready VF, leading to config
read/write failures or even triggering PCIe AERs if the unready VF later
responds with RRS to non-Vendor-ID accesses.
While VFs architecturally return ~0 for Vendor ID when they are ready, polling
PCI_COMMAND when the Vendor ID returns ~0 (as done in the non-RRS SV path
below) could resolve this without exiting prematurely.
> } else {
> pci_read_config_dword(dev, PCI_COMMAND, &id);
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261011163249.18479-1-gruhlke@mailbox.org?part=2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-11 16:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-11 16:32 [PATCH v2 0/2] PCI: Wait after FLR for devices that don't honor Immediate Readiness Alexander Gruhlke
2026-10-11 16:32 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] PCI: Ignore Immediate Readiness on Samsung 990 PRO NVMe Alexander Gruhlke
2026-10-11 16:39 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-11 18:00 ` Lukas Wunner
2026-10-11 18:18 ` Alexander Gruhlke
2026-10-11 16:32 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] PCI: Don't treat ~0 as ready in pci_dev_wait() with RRS SV Alexander Gruhlke
2026-10-11 16:41 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-10-11 16:49 ` Alexander Gruhlke
2026-10-11 18:13 ` Lukas Wunner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-167316@kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=gruhlke@mailbox.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox