From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; t=1793117671; b=TohtLn5iO8luo75xx7mESIk3Lw4lzdTOwD/O1m37knJsu7eibgD8OqgVMZktrwPfG8t2 YQL1BRQpz/OJgIWOx1j2/IodzcDds9FZcgohhkGXvxTj5wxvkdaQYzZM4VuyAyvMC8yvU R0DSUSXVBS34UTu2VUXWAIB6zLnEQ8UKAiyOIsh5e2cTlqdmckAdEKfbE7JWRjTCaMb/E 7j+tVPT8bDKfykFgjpPIPy765LLHhDAax+6p3QaiifNA3dHNLU2LY4p4CCVt1sow9X3wk dRIsU4uYtVvZhaK3kOXflIsD6UhTcDlOotO6xrpiU8w2raqu8gglab7h09PYtPraz0g== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1793117671; h=Received:DKIM-Signature:Message-ID:From:Subject:Reply-To:To: In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Date; bh=1R+wqpuCpHE/NZWhuoW0PE/NrqhCJqiCbk7bTSBaCmU=; b=LmbNwcwDC2AjtcLi0eMdmirlV61CvWyzEvCfPKzoIjggORX/0CdTSMMvQQYI7TQXZ5Rp mn+tKXX1KoSZbgWhNJlrBGUS0CH5cPKXl8Dm56iFLguF+OAF/KGStnZZcCIic3tDaW20q ptwULcTrjla/Zye2VWQH1wLjZIC2M4V7jkUsUhNgvsBTdtp7A9pR++N9hbBLOFqi0JbHC UESumI6QdfD+UpYG5eWt4Vebts/HXSBgqw3uXO7PMBiFwdW7+fklqiVRYUWrOqKBlakqu rs/0EL2JtGG3SrGgF+8jAgjW1nS9O/KQ62QGb5QlivoK84rxBT3/QW6XuuPhq4fWlAA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=k20260515 header.b=Rc3GYBD6; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=100.103.45.18 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (quasi.space.kernel.org [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 350BE606A31B for ; Tue, 27 Oct 2026 16:14:30 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key, unprotected) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=k20260515 header.b=Rc3GYBD6 Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A3FC21F01825; Tue, 27 Oct 2026 16:14:30 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1793117670; bh=1R+wqpuCpHE/NZWhuoW0PE/NrqhCJqiCbk7bTSBaCmU=; h=From:Subject:Reply-To:To:In-Reply-To:References:Date; b=Rc3GYBD6S905k4ylrS7BPRXV16w4dfyc3zQz32mRZtQtyHRB2i9y+fe5MvG2G2LiY oBOg4PdXnzP9v66rWpDxbf14hIsSxcU3QQu60Grui2qx8R8Qz58o8vX9au9YAWneKN XqT8GZNVFhtUrcSx/q4J6mp2CIDKbFdWcs2qaUsIWaMe/058GIQ9FIgTGLzFsCnnbI zadr/iYJsbzSM+dhdjhXbMFIzK8K5VCxpV1dbh+SDQaJE9VmaPAfpQofKLtu19a5W8 AHn0rM1crjbQYXzmrjwGwNSb2zBAY8Wrt1OUIC9+zwogp+KdxCR0UTGp55dxhbAkp6 CzKsag4P9g1FQ== Message-ID: From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 05/13] ionic: Lock VFs around pci_reset_function_locked() Reply-To: sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev To: "Lukasz Laguna" , linux-pci@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20261027160446.858300-6-lukasz.laguna@intel.com> References: <20261027160446.858300-1-lukasz.laguna@intel.com> <20261027160446.858300-6-lukasz.laguna@intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2026 16:14:30 +0000 X-Mailing-List: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: List-Owner: Precedence: list > pci_reset_function_locked() now requires PF callers to hold the device > locks for all enabled VFs as well. Lock VFs around the reset in > ionic_pci_error_resume(). >=20 > Signed-off-by: Lukasz Laguna Sashiko has reviewed this patch and found no issues. --=20 Sashiko AI review =C2=B7 https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261027160446.8583= 00-1-lukasz.laguna@intel.com?part=3D5