From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Jose Ignacio Tornos Martinez" <jtornosm@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 7/8] ath12k: use KVM MSI domain for VM passthrough
Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2026 17:04:07 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-189709@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261029163713.1366077-8-jtornosm@redhat.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 3 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] wifi: ath12k: stale msi_ep_base_data not updated in ath12k_pci_power_up()
- [High] wifi: ath12k: module load failure on baremetal when PCI_KVM_MSI_DOMAIN=m
- [Medium] wifi: ath12k: vmlinux link failure when ATH12K=y and PCI_KVM_MSI_DOMAIN=m
--
commit ea9e51c37aa4f1f3d5125a423b52732232e12c47
Author: Jose Ignacio Tornos Martinez <jtornosm@redhat.com>
ath12k: use KVM MSI domain for VM passthrough
This commit adds support for synchronizing and retrieving the host physical
message signaled interrupt address via the kvm pci msi domain in
ath12k_pci_power_up() and ath12k_pci_get_msi_address() when running in a
virtual machine.
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath12k/pci.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath12k/pci.c
> index f7879fb48d32e..dbd960f88d386 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath12k/pci.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath12k/pci.c
> @@ -8,6 +8,9 @@
> #include <linux/interrupt.h>
> #include <linux/msi.h>
> #include <linux/pci.h>
> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PCI_KVM_MSI_DOMAIN)
> +#include <linux/pci-kvm-msi.h>
> +#endif
> #include <linux/time.h>
> #include <linux/vmalloc.h>
>
> @@ -1082,6 +1085,11 @@ void ath12k_pci_get_msi_address(struct ath12k_base *ab, u32 *msi_addr_lo,
> struct ath12k_pci *ab_pci = ath12k_pci_priv(ab);
> struct pci_dev *pci_dev = to_pci_dev(ab->dev);
>
> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PCI_KVM_MSI_DOMAIN)
> + if (kvm_pci_msi_get_address(pci_dev, msi_addr_lo, msi_addr_hi, NULL))
> + return;
> +#endif
[Severity: Medium]
Will this cause a vmlinux link failure when ath12k is built-in and the kvm
msi domain driver is built as a loadable module?
Both Kconfig options are defined as tristate without a dependency between
them:
drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath12k/Kconfig:
config ATH12K
tristate "Qualcomm Wi-Fi 7 support (ath12k)"
depends on MAC80211 && HAS_DMA && PCI
drivers/pci/controller/Kconfig:
config PCI_KVM_MSI_DOMAIN
tristate "KVM PCI passthrough MSI domain"
depends on X86_64 && KVM_GUEST && PCI_MSI
Because the calls to kvm_pci_msi_get_address() in
ath12k_pci_get_msi_address() and kvm_pci_msi_wait_ready() in
ath12k_pci_power_up() are guarded with:
#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PCI_KVM_MSI_DOMAIN)
building with ath12k=y and pci_kvm_msi_domain=m causes built-in
drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath12k/pci.o to emit direct calls to symbols in
pci-kvm-msi.ko, failing at the vmlinux link stage. Should this use
IS_REACHABLE() or enforce a Kconfig dependency?
[Severity: High]
What happens on baremetal when both ath12k and pci-kvm-msi are built as
modules?
The direct calls to kvm_pci_msi_get_address() and kvm_pci_msi_wait_ready()
create a hard symbol dependency from ath12k.ko onto pci-kvm-msi.ko. When
modprobe loads pci-kvm-msi.ko first, kvm_pci_msi_init() aborts module
loading on baremetal or when no device in kvm_msi_devids is present on the
bus:
drivers/pci/controller/pci-kvm-msi.c:kvm_pci_msi_init() {
if (!kvm_para_available())
return -ENODEV;
for_each_pci_dev(pdev) {
if (pci_match_id(kvm_msi_devids, pdev)) {
first = pdev;
break;
}
}
if (!first) {
pr_info("kvm-pci-msi: no matching devices found\n");
return -ENODEV;
}
Note that kvm_msi_devids only matches 0x1103 and 0x1107 here, and even
with later commit 1d17e12c16ad ("PCI: add QCN9274 to reset quirks and KVM
MSI domain") adding 0x1109, baremetal systems, guests with only other
ath12k devices such as 0x1112, or guests prior to hotplug still return
-ENODEV from kvm_pci_msi_init().
When pci-kvm-msi.ko fails to load with -ENODEV, its exported symbols are
never registered, preventing ath12k.ko from loading on baremetal. Could
that break ath12k module loading on distribution kernels where both options
are enabled as modules?
>
> pci_read_config_dword(pci_dev, pci_dev->msi_cap + PCI_MSI_ADDRESS_LO,
> msi_addr_lo);
>
> @@ -1485,6 +1493,10 @@ int ath12k_pci_power_up(struct ath12k_base *ab)
>
> ath12k_pci_msi_enable(ab_pci);
>
> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PCI_KVM_MSI_DOMAIN)
> + kvm_pci_msi_wait_ready(ab_pci->pdev, 500);
> +#endif
[Severity: High]
Does ab_pci->msi_ep_base_data remain stale with the guest virtual message
data after kvm_pci_msi_wait_ready() completes in ath12k_pci_power_up()?
During ath12k_pci_probe(), before ath12k_pci_power_up() runs,
ath12k_pci_config_msi_data() latches msi_desc->msg.data into
ab_pci->msi_ep_base_data:
drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath12k/pci.c:ath12k_pci_config_msi_data() {
...
ab_pci->msi_ep_base_data = msi_desc->msg.data;
At that point kvm_pci_msi_wait_ready() has not yet been called, so
msi_desc->msg.data contains the guest virtual vector data rather than the
host physical base data.
Later, when ath12k_pci_power_up() calls kvm_pci_msi_wait_ready(), the host
address and data are fetched and cached in kvm_data->msg and desc->msg,
but ab_pci->msi_ep_base_data is never updated here, and
ath12k_pci_get_msi_address() passes NULL for the data argument of
kvm_pci_msi_get_address().
When copy engine and data path rings are subsequently configured via
ath12k_ce_srng_msi_ring_params_setup() and ath12k_dp_srng_msi_setup(),
ath12k_hif_get_user_msi_vector() calls ath12k_pci_get_user_msi_assignment():
drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath12k/pci.c:ath12k_pci_get_user_msi_assignment() {
...
*num_vectors = msi_config->users[idx].num_vectors;
*base_vector = msi_config->users[idx].base_vector;
*user_base_data = *base_vector + ab_pci->msi_ep_base_data;
Wouldn't this program the device registers and firmware ring setup messages
with the stale guest message data instead of the host base data retrieved
by kvm_pci_msi_wait_ready()?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261029163713.1366077-1-jtornosm@redhat.com?part=7
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-29 17:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-29 16:37 [PATCH v3 0/8] PCI/KVM/VFIO: MSI address passthrough for Qualcomm WiFi devices Jose Ignacio Tornos Martinez
2026-10-29 16:37 ` [PATCH v3 1/8] vfio: add helper to find PCI device by vendor/device ID Jose Ignacio Tornos Martinez
2026-10-29 16:53 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-29 16:37 ` [PATCH v3 2/8] KVM: add PCI MSI hypercall for VFIO passthrough Jose Ignacio Tornos Martinez
2026-10-29 16:58 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-10-29 16:59 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-29 16:37 ` [PATCH v3 3/8] PCI: add KVM MSI domain guest module Jose Ignacio Tornos Martinez
2026-10-29 17:06 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-29 16:37 ` [PATCH v3 4/8] ath11k: add PCIe link recovery retry Jose Ignacio Tornos Martinez
2026-10-29 16:45 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-29 16:37 ` [PATCH v3 5/8] ath11k: use KVM MSI domain for VM passthrough Jose Ignacio Tornos Martinez
2026-10-29 16:54 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-29 17:00 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-10-29 16:37 ` [PATCH v3 6/8] ath12k: add PCIe link recovery retry Jose Ignacio Tornos Martinez
2026-10-29 17:00 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-29 16:37 ` [PATCH v3 7/8] ath12k: use KVM MSI domain for VM passthrough Jose Ignacio Tornos Martinez
2026-10-29 17:04 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-10-29 16:37 ` [PATCH v3 8/8] PCI: add QCN9274 to reset quirks and KVM MSI domain Jose Ignacio Tornos Martinez
2026-10-29 17:02 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-189709@kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=jtornosm@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox