From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: alistair23@gmail.com, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org
Cc: ojeda@kernel.org, gary@garyguo.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 22/25] rust: x509: Add X509 certificate bindings
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2026 04:54:00 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-206248@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261110041832.1730924-23-alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 4 potential
issues to consider:
- [Medium] rust: x509: missing unsupported_sig check in
Certificate::verify_signed()
- [Medium] rust: x509: pkey_len() returns ASN.1 DER sequence size
instead of RSA modulus
- [Low] rust: x509: missing inline attribute on small methods in x509.rs
- [Low] rust: x509: imports do not follow vertical import grouping style
--
commit b7f2b997e084d89e8ffc231afb5c218c305c3ae1
Author: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
rust: x509: Add X509 certificate bindings
This commit adds Rust wrappers around the kernel X.509 certificate parser
APIs for parsing DER certificates, inspecting their fields, and verifying
signatures.
> diff --git a/rust/kernel/x509.rs b/rust/kernel/x509.rs
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000000000..56369ef520cd1
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/rust/kernel/x509.rs
> @@ -0,0 +1,236 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +
> +// Copyright (C) 2026 Western Digital
> +
> +//! Wrappers around the Linux kernel X509 parser APIs.
> +//!
> +//! C headers: [`include/keys/x509-parser.h`](srctree/include/keys/x509-parser.h).
> +
> +use core::marker::PhantomData;
> +use core::ptr::{
> + self,
> + NonNull, //
> +};
> +use kernel::prelude::*;
> +use kernel::{
> + bindings,
> + error::{
> + from_err_ptr,
> + to_result, //
> + },
> + public_key::PublicKey,
> +};
[Severity: Low]
This isn't a bug, but the imports from core and kernel are split across
separate use statements instead of being grouped into single vertical
import blocks per the Rust coding guidelines.
[ ... ]
> +impl KeyExtFlags {
> + /// Whether the CA basic constraint is asserted.
> + pub fn is_ca(self) -> bool {
> + self.0 & (1 << bindings::KEY_EFLAG_CA) != 0
> + }
> +
> + /// Whether the keyCertSign key usage is asserted.
> + pub fn key_cert_sign(self) -> bool {
> + self.0 & (1 << bindings::KEY_EFLAG_KEYCERTSIGN) != 0
> + }
> +
> + /// Whether the digitalSignature key usage is asserted.
> + pub fn digital_signature(self) -> bool {
> + self.0 & (1 << bindings::KEY_EFLAG_DIGITALSIG) != 0
> + }
> +}
> +
> +impl<'a> Certificate<'a> {
> + /// Parses a DER certificate from `data` and returns it with the length
> + /// of the certificate in bytes.
> + ///
> + /// The returned certificate borrows `data` (`x509_cert_parse()` keeps
> + /// pointers into the DER buffer), so `data` must outlive it.
> + pub fn parse(data: &'a [u8]) -> Result<(Self, usize)> {
[Severity: Low]
This isn't a bug, but in the kernel crate, small functions and functions
that forward to C bindings should be marked #[inline]; KeyExtFlags::is_ca(),
KeyExtFlags::key_cert_sign(), KeyExtFlags::digital_signature(), and
Certificate::parse() omit it.
[ ... ]
> + /// Length of the raw public key (in bytes). For RSA keys this is the
> + /// modulus length; for ECDSA keys the uncompressed public key encoding.
> + #[inline]
> + pub fn pkey_len(&self) -> Result<usize> {
> + // SAFETY: `self.cert` is valid per the struct invariants.
> + let pub_key = unsafe { (*self.cert.as_ptr()).pub_ };
> + let pub_key = NonNull::new(pub_key).ok_or(EINVAL)?;
> +
> + // SAFETY: `pub_key` is valid and non-NULL as checked above.
> + Ok(unsafe { (*pub_key.as_ptr()).keylen } as usize)
> + }
[Severity: Medium]
Does Certificate::pkey_len() return the ASN.1 DER sequence size instead of
the modulus length for RSA keys?
In crypto/asymmetric_keys/x509_cert_parser.c, x509_extract_key_data() sets
cert->pub->keylen to the entire SubjectPublicKeyInfo BIT STRING payload,
which for RSA is the DER-encoded RSAPublicKey SEQUENCE (including ASN.1
headers and the public exponent, e.g. ~270 bytes for a 2048-bit key rather
than 256). Callers using pkey_len() to check RSA key sizes as documented
will get the wrong length.
[ ... ]
> + /// Verify that `child`'s signature is signed by this cert's public/private key.
> + #[inline]
> + pub fn verify_signed(&self, child: &Self) -> Result {
> + // SAFETY: both certificate pointers were produced by `x509_cert_parse()`
> + // and remain valid until dropped.
> + let (prev, child) = unsafe { (&*self.cert.as_ptr(), &*child.cert.as_ptr()) };
> +
> + let prev_pub = NonNull::new(prev.pub_).ok_or(EINVAL)?;
> + let child_sig = NonNull::new(child.sig).ok_or(EINVAL)?;
> +
> + // SAFETY: `prev_pub` and `child_sig` are valid for at least the duration
> + // of this call.
> + unsafe {
> + to_result(bindings::public_key_verify_signature(
> + prev_pub.as_ptr(),
> + child_sig.as_ptr(),
> + ))
> + }
> + }
[Severity: Medium]
Can Certificate::verify_signed() pass a NULL digest to
public_key_verify_signature() when child.unsupported_sig is set?
When the signature hash algorithm is unavailable (-ENOENT),
x509_get_sig_params() sets cert->unsupported_sig = true and returns 0
without allocating cert->sig->m:
crypto/asymmetric_keys/x509_public_key.c:x509_get_sig_params() {
...
tfm = crypto_alloc_shash(sig->hash_algo, 0, 0);
if (IS_ERR(tfm)) {
if (PTR_ERR(tfm) == -ENOENT) {
cert->unsupported_sig = true;
return 0;
}
return PTR_ERR(tfm);
}
...
}
x509_cert_parse() then returns a certificate where child.sig is non-NULL
but child.sig->m is NULL and child.sig->m_size is 0. If a caller invokes
verify_signed() without first calling check_accepted(), an ECDSA issuer key
reaches ecdsa_verify(), which clamps bufsize to dlen (0) and zero-fills the
hash via ecc_digits_from_bytes(), verifying the signature against an
all-zero digest. Checking child.unsupported_sig (or child_sig->m) in
verify_signed() would prevent this.
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261110041832.1730924-1-alistair.francis@wdc.com?part=22
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-10 4:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-10 4:18 [PATCH v6 00/25] lib: Rust implementation of SPDM alistair23
2026-11-10 4:18 ` [PATCH v6 01/25] virt: coco: change tsm_register() to use a const struct alistair23
2026-11-10 4:27 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-12 2:39 ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-11-12 3:16 ` Alistair Francis
2026-11-10 4:18 ` [PATCH v6 02/25] rust: create basic untrusted data API alistair23
2026-11-10 4:34 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-10 4:18 ` [PATCH v6 03/25] rust: validate: add `Validate` trait alistair23
2026-11-10 4:26 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-10 4:18 ` [PATCH v6 04/25] X.509: Make certificate parser public alistair23
2026-11-10 4:26 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-10 4:18 ` [PATCH v6 05/25] X.509: Parse Subject Alternative Name in certificates alistair23
2026-11-10 4:26 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-10 4:18 ` [PATCH v6 06/25] X.509: Move certificate length retrieval into new helper alistair23
2026-11-10 4:27 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-10 4:18 ` [PATCH v6 07/25] rust: add bindings for hash.h alistair23
2026-11-10 4:30 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-10 4:18 ` [PATCH v6 08/25] rust: device: Expose Device as_raw() publicly alistair23
2026-11-10 4:26 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-10 4:18 ` [PATCH v6 09/25] lib: rspdm: Initial commit of Rust SPDM alistair23
2026-11-10 4:32 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-10 4:18 ` [PATCH v6 10/25] PCI/TSM: Rename pf0 to host alistair23
2026-11-10 4:28 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-10 4:18 ` [PATCH v6 11/25] PCI/TSM: Support connecting to PCIe CMA devices alistair23
2026-11-10 4:45 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-10 4:18 ` [PATCH v6 12/25] PCI/CMA: Add a PCI TSM CMA driver using SPDM alistair23
2026-11-10 4:41 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-10 4:18 ` [PATCH v6 13/25] PCI/CMA: Validate Subject Alternative Name in certificates alistair23
2026-11-10 4:40 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-10 4:18 ` [PATCH v6 14/25] lib: rspdm: Support SPDM get_version alistair23
2026-11-10 4:32 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-10 4:18 ` [PATCH v6 15/25] lib: rspdm: Support SPDM get_capabilities alistair23
2026-11-10 4:38 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-10 4:18 ` [PATCH v6 16/25] rust: kernel: Add crypto hash bindings alistair23
2026-11-10 4:37 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-10 4:18 ` [PATCH v6 17/25] lib: rspdm: Support SPDM negotiate_algorithms alistair23
2026-11-10 4:42 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-12 4:50 ` Alistair Francis
2026-11-10 4:18 ` [PATCH v6 18/25] lib: rspdm: Support SPDM get_digests alistair23
2026-11-10 4:42 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-10 4:18 ` [PATCH v6 19/25] lib: rspdm: Support SPDM get_certificate alistair23
2026-11-10 4:40 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-10 4:18 ` [PATCH v6 20/25] rust: public_key: Add crypto public key bindings alistair23
2026-11-10 4:47 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-10 4:18 ` [PATCH v6 21/25] keys: Guard asymmetric-type.h behind CONFIG_KEYS alistair23
2026-11-10 4:41 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-10 4:18 ` [PATCH v6 22/25] rust: x509: Add X509 certificate bindings alistair23
2026-11-10 4:54 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-11-10 4:18 ` [PATCH v6 23/25] lib: rspdm: Support SPDM certificate validation alistair23
2026-11-10 4:51 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-10 4:18 ` [PATCH v6 24/25] lib: rspdm: Support SPDM challenge alistair23
2026-11-10 4:49 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-10 4:18 ` [PATCH v6 25/25] lib: rspdm: Expose public Rust API alistair23
2026-11-10 4:53 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-206248@kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=alistair23@gmail.com \
--cc=gary@garyguo.net \
--cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ojeda@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox