From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: lirongqing <lirongqing@baidu.com>, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI: Only restore state that was successfully saved around a reset
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2026 05:51:17 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-206347@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261110053348.2419-1-lirongqing@baidu.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential
issue to consider:
- [High] PCI: pci_dev_restore() skips restoring preserved state after
error reset
It also noticed 1 related pre-existing issue this patch does not
introduce:
- [High] PCI: capability buffer corruption on disconnect in
pci_save_state() [1]
--
commit 101ae1e1e66a05607699c91780a5db7e8edbbdc0
Author: Li RongQing <lirongqing@baidu.com>
PCI: Only restore state that was successfully saved around a reset
This commit clears dev->state_saved when pci_dev_save_and_disable() skips
saving inaccessible config space and checks dev->state_saved before calling
pci_restore_state() in pci_dev_restore().
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci.c b/drivers/pci/pci.c
> index d6590805faeb2..2327f47f3fda5 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/pci.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/pci.c
> @@ -5309,8 +5309,10 @@ static void pci_dev_save_and_disable(struct pci_dev *dev)
> */
> pci_set_power_state(dev, PCI_D0);
>
> - if (!pci_dev_config_accessible(dev, "save state"))
> + if (!pci_dev_config_accessible(dev, "save state")) {
> + dev->state_saved = false;
> return;
> + }
>
> pci_save_state(dev);
[Severity: High]
This problem wasn't introduced by this patch, but can pci_save_state()
corrupt the saved PCIe capability state [1] if the device becomes
inaccessible mid-save?
pci_save_state() sets dev->state_saved to true and calls
pci_save_pcie_state(), which reads capability registers into
save_state->cap.data without checking for errors:
drivers/pci/pci.c:pci_save_pcie_state() {
...
cap = (u16 *)&save_state->cap.data[0];
pcie_capability_read_word(dev, PCI_EXP_DEVCTL, &cap[i++]);
pcie_capability_read_word(dev, PCI_EXP_LNKCTL, &cap[i++]);
pcie_capability_read_word(dev, PCI_EXP_SLTCTL, &cap[i++]);
...
}
If the device disconnects during this window, these reads store ~0 (or 0 on
explicit read failure) into the persistent save buffer, and
pci_restore_state() later writes those corrupted values back to registers
such as PCI_EXP_DEVCTL.
[ ... ]
> @@ -5328,7 +5330,8 @@ static void pci_dev_restore(struct pci_dev *dev)
> const struct pci_error_handlers *err_handler =
> dev->driver ? dev->driver->err_handler : NULL;
>
> - pci_restore_state(dev);
> + if (dev->state_saved)
> + pci_restore_state(dev);
[Severity: High]
Does skipping pci_restore_state() here introduce a regression that leaves
the device unconfigured after a reset recovers it from an error?
Commit a2f1e22390ac ("PCI/ERR: Ensure error recoverability at all times")
saves the initial config space in pci_bus_add_device() and removed the
dev->state_saved check from pci_restore_state() so a valid baseline state
is always available even after a prior restore cleared dev->state_saved.
Commit e18d1abc3bff ("PCI: Avoid saving config space state if inaccessible")
then skipped pci_save_state() in pci_dev_save_and_disable() when config
space is inaccessible (such as during DPC) to avoid overwriting that
preserved state with ~0 before the reset.
Since the hardware reset clears the device's registers back to power-on
defaults, clearing dev->state_saved and skipping pci_restore_state() leaves
BARs, PCI_COMMAND, capabilities, and bridge bus numbers unprogrammed once
the reset makes config space accessible again.
[1] https://sashiko.dev/#/bug/linux-60bae679-5c85-4c49-8042-6817f9cb5c8f
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261110053348.2419-1-lirongqing@baidu.com?part=1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-10 5:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-10 5:33 [PATCH] PCI: Only restore state that was successfully saved around a reset lirongqing
2026-11-10 5:33 ` [PATCH] PCI: Save the Root Port state before a platform-specific reset lirongqing
2026-11-10 5:55 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-10 8:19 ` 答复: [外部邮件] " Li,Rongqing
2026-11-10 10:16 ` Lukas Wunner
2026-11-12 2:47 ` 答复: [????] " Li,Rongqing
2026-11-10 5:51 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-11-10 8:17 ` 答复: [外部邮件] Re: [PATCH] PCI: Only restore state that was successfully saved around a reset Li,Rongqing
2026-11-10 10:13 ` Lukas Wunner
2026-11-10 18:09 ` Farhan Ali
2026-11-12 2:31 ` 答复: [外部邮件] " Li,Rongqing
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-206347@kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lirongqing@baidu.com \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox