Linux PCI subsystem development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: lirongqing <lirongqing@baidu.com>, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI: Clear the bridge's subordinate pointer when child bus registration fails
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2026 05:56:04 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-206355@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261110053410.2469-1-lirongqing@baidu.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential
issue to consider:
- [Low] PCI: missing Fixes trailer for pci_alloc_child_bus() error
  cleanup
It also noticed 1 related pre-existing issue this patch does not
introduce:
- [Critical] PCI: double put of bridge->dev in
  pci_register_host_bridge() [1]
--

commit 145a85e5894672f4949013776fe03b0bdc6734a5
Author: Li RongQing <lirongqing@baidu.com>

> PCI: Clear the bridge's subordinate pointer when child bus registration fails
>
> pci_alloc_child_bus() stores the new bus in bridge->subordinate before
> device_register(&child->dev). If registration fails,
> put_device(&child->dev) runs release_pcibus_dev() and frees the bus, but
> bridge->subordinate still points at it.
>
> The caller returns without scanning the new bus, yet the rest of the rescan
> or removal path still follows dev->subordinate:
> pci_assign_unassigned_bridge_resources() and pci_stop_bus_device() walk
> bus->devices of the freed bus.
>
> Clear the pointer before dropping the reference.
>
> Signed-off-by: Li RongQing <lirongqing@baidu.com>

[Severity: Low]
Since 1f2768b6a3ee ("PCI: Fix reference leak in pci_alloc_child_bus()")
added the put_device(&child->dev) call that frees child on registration
failure without clearing bridge->subordinate, should this include:

  Fixes: 1f2768b6a3ee ("PCI: Fix reference leak in pci_alloc_child_bus()")

> diff --git a/drivers/pci/probe.c b/drivers/pci/probe.c
> index 222ad696a1581..efa85ae052106 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/probe.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/probe.c
> @@ -1271,6 +1271,8 @@ static struct pci_bus *pci_alloc_child_bus(struct pci_bus *parent,
>  	pci_set_bus_msi_domain(child);
>  	ret = device_register(&child->dev);
>  	if (WARN_ON(ret < 0)) {
> +		if (bridge)
> +			bridge->subordinate = NULL;
>  		put_device(&child->dev);
>  		return NULL;
>  	}

[Severity: Critical]
This problem wasn't introduced by this patch, but does
pci_register_host_bridge() [1] drop bridge->dev twice when
device_register(&bus->dev) fails?

pci_register_host_bridge() takes a second reference to bridge->dev via
bus->bridge = get_device(&bridge->dev).  When device_register(&bus->dev)
fails, the error path jumps to unregister, which calls
put_device(&bridge->dev) and then put_device(&bus->dev):

drivers/pci/probe.c:pci_register_host_bridge() {
	...
	bus->bridge = get_device(&bridge->dev);
	...
	err = device_register(&bus->dev);
	bus_registered = true;
	if (err)
		goto unregister;
	...
unregister:
	put_device(&bridge->dev);
	device_del(&bridge->dev);
free:
	...
	if (bus_registered)
		put_device(&bus->dev);
}

Because put_device(&bus->dev) invokes release_pcibus_dev(), which calls
put_device(pci_bus->bridge), both references to bridge->dev are dropped
and the host bridge is freed before returning to the caller.  When a
caller such as pci_create_root_bus() then calls put_device(&bridge->dev)
on its own error path, it triggers a use-after-free and double put.

[1] https://sashiko.dev/#/bug/linux-274884f5-d0c4-48cf-95bc-82c1e0b3753d

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261110053410.2469-1-lirongqing@baidu.com?part=1

  reply	other threads:[~2026-11-10  5:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-11-10  5:34 [PATCH] PCI: Clear the bridge's subordinate pointer when child bus registration fails lirongqing
2026-11-10  5:56 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-11-10  8:16   ` 答复: [外部邮件] " Li,Rongqing

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-206355@kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lirongqing@baidu.com \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox