From: deloptes <emanoil.kotsev@deloptes.org>
To: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: SSD SATA 3.3 and Broadcom / LSI SAS1068E PCI-Express Fusion-MPT SAS
Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2023 01:35:35 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ubedo7$151n$1@ciao.gmane.io> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20230814162028.GA176555@bhelgaas
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1510 bytes --]
Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> I don't know why that would be. Are there any hints in the dmesg log?
> Can you collect the complete dmesg log with the old drives and again
> with the new SSDs so we can compare them? I assume you have good
> cables? I assume the same cables worked at 3.0 Gb/s with the old
> drives.
>
> I would *expect* that SATA r3.3 would be completely backwards
> compatible, so since mptsas worked just fine at 3.0 Gb/s with the old
> SATA r3.0 drives, it should also work just fine at 3.0 Gb/s with the
> new SATA r3.3 drives. But I have no actual knowledge about that.
Thank you for your answer. I am also confused and couldn't think of any
meaningful reason. This is why I allowed myself to bother you.
I did not change anything - wiring or such. The server has 12 disk bays on
the front. Old disks were pulled out and new disks were inserted into the
bays.
You (probably much knowable in this matters than me) also assume negotiation
should result in 3.0Gb/s. And if I understand correctly it should be not a
driver issue.
The only difference I could find out for now is that Rev3.3 introduced PWDIS
on Pin 3. To check if the cables provide wiring on P3 I should disassemble
the server, but I can do this in September :/ and it is a lot of effort.
I am attaching a portion of the log and dmesg with the relevant information.
I see that ASPM is disabled by default (could it be related to P3?).
Thank you all in advance
BR
--
FCD6 3719 0FFB F1BF 38EA 4727 5348 5F1F DCFE BCB0
[-- Attachment #2: dmesg.gz --]
[-- Type: application/gzip, Size: 12095 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #3: syslog.txt.gz --]
[-- Type: application/gzip, Size: 12112 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-08-14 23:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-08-13 9:15 SSD SATA 3.3 and Broadcom / LSI SAS1068E PCI-Express Fusion-MPT SAS deloptes
2023-08-14 16:20 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2023-08-14 23:35 ` deloptes [this message]
2023-08-15 14:45 ` Sathya Prakash Veerichetty
2023-08-15 22:33 ` deloptes
2023-08-15 17:49 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2023-08-15 22:46 ` deloptes
2023-08-15 23:15 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2023-09-29 15:23 ` deloptes
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='ubedo7$151n$1@ciao.gmane.io' \
--to=emanoil.kotsev@deloptes.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).