linux-pci.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
Cc: Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@linux.ibm.com>,
	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>, Gerd Bayer <gbayer@linux.ibm.com>,
	Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@linux.ibm.com>,
	linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] PCI: s390: Fix use-after-free of PCI resources with per-function hotplug
Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2023 11:29:47 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <your-ad-here.call-01678444187-ext-6579@work.hours> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230308231449.GA1057317@bhelgaas>

On Wed, Mar 08, 2023 at 05:14:49PM -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 06, 2023 at 04:10:11PM +0100, Niklas Schnelle wrote:
> > On s390 PCI functions may be hotplugged individually even when they
> > belong to a multi-function device. In particular on an SR-IOV device VFs
> > may be removed and later re-added.
> > 
> > In commit a50297cf8235 ("s390/pci: separate zbus creation from
> > scanning") it was missed however that struct pci_bus and struct
> > zpci_bus's resource list retained a reference to the PCI functions MMIO
> > resources even though those resources are released and freed on
> > hot-unplug. These stale resources may subsequently be claimed when the
> > PCI function re-appears resulting in use-after-free.
> > 
> > One idea of fixing this use-after-free in s390 specific code that was
> > investigated was to simply keep resources around from the moment a PCI
> > function first appeared until the whole virtual PCI bus created for
> > a multi-function device disappears. The problem with this however is
> > that due to the requirement of artificial MMIO addreesses (address
> > cookies) extra logic is then needed to keep the address cookies
> > compatible on re-plug. At the same time the MMIO resources semantically
> > belong to the PCI function so tying their lifecycle to the function
> > seems more logical.
> > 
> > Instead a simpler approach is to remove the resources of an individually
> > hot-unplugged PCI function from the PCI bus's resource list while
> > keeping the resources of other PCI functions on the PCI bus untouched.
> > 
> > This is done by introducing pci_bus_remove_resource() to remove an
> > individual resource. Similarly the resource also needs to be removed
> > from the struct zpci_bus's resource list. It turns out however, that
> > there is really no need to add the MMIO resources to the struct
> > zpci_bus's resource list at all and instead we can simply use the
> > zpci_bar_struct's resource pointer directly.
> > 
> > Fixes: a50297cf8235 ("s390/pci: separate zbus creation from scanning")
> > Signed-off-by: Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@linux.ibm.com>
> 
> Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
> 
> The meat of this is mostly in s390, so I think it makes more sense to
> merge via that tree.  But let me know if you'd rather that I take it.

I'll take it via s390 tree. Thanks

  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-03-10 10:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-03-06 15:10 [PATCH v2 0/4] PCI: s390: Fix user-after-free and clean up Niklas Schnelle
2023-03-06 15:10 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] PCI: s390: Fix use-after-free of PCI resources with per-function hotplug Niklas Schnelle
2023-03-08 23:14   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2023-03-09 16:39     ` Niklas Schnelle
2023-03-10 10:29     ` Vasily Gorbik [this message]
2023-03-09 18:18   ` Matthew Rosato
2023-04-17  7:46   ` Lukas Wunner
2023-04-17 10:07     ` Andy Shevchenko
2023-03-06 15:10 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] s390/pci: only add specific device in zpci_bus_scan_device() Niklas Schnelle
2023-03-09 18:36   ` Matthew Rosato
2023-03-06 15:10 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] s390/pci: remove redundant pci_bus_add_devices() on new bus Niklas Schnelle
2023-03-09 19:14   ` Matthew Rosato
2023-03-06 15:10 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] s390/pci: clean up left over special treatment for function zero Niklas Schnelle
2023-03-09 18:37   ` Matthew Rosato

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=your-ad-here.call-01678444187-ext-6579@work.hours \
    --to=gor@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=gbayer@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lukas@wunner.de \
    --cc=mjrosato@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=schnelle@linux.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).