linux-pci.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@kernel.org>
To: Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@huawei.com>
Cc: linux-coco@lists.linux.dev, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	dan.j.williams@intel.com, aik@amd.com, lukas@wunner.de,
	Samuel Ortiz <sameo@rivosinc.com>,
	Xu Yilun <yilun.xu@linux.intel.com>,
	Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>,
	Suzuki K Poulose <Suzuki.Poulose@arm.com>,
	Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>,
	Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 02/11] coco: guest: arm64: Add Realm Host Interface and guest DA helper
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2025 10:37:13 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <yq5aa50cm326.fsf@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251119153200.00007fd0@huawei.com>

Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@huawei.com> writes:

> On Mon, 17 Nov 2025 19:29:58 +0530
> "Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)" <aneesh.kumar@kernel.org> wrote:
>
>> - describe the Realm Host Interface SMC IDs and result codes in a new
>>   `asm/rhi.h` header
>> - expose `struct rsi_host_call` plus an `rsi_host_call()` helper so we can
>>   invoke `SMC_RSI_HOST_CALL` from C code
>> - build a guest-side `rhi-da` helper that drives the vdev TDI state machine
>>   via RHI host calls and translates the firmware status codes
>> 
>> This provides the basic RHI plumbing that later DA features rely on.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm) <aneesh.kumar@kernel.org>
> Hi Aneesh, minor comments follow.
>
>> diff --git a/drivers/virt/coco/arm-cca-guest/rhi-da.c b/drivers/virt/coco/arm-cca-guest/rhi-da.c
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 000000000000..3430d8df4424
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/drivers/virt/coco/arm-cca-guest/rhi-da.c
> ...
>
>> +
>> +bool rhi_has_da_support(void)
>> +{
>> +	int ret;
>> +	struct rsi_host_call *rhicall;
>> +
>> +	rhicall = kmalloc(sizeof(struct rsi_host_call), GFP_KERNEL);
>
> Doesn't look to be passed out anywhere, so not obvious why the lifetime
> of this extends beyond this function.  Maybe I'm missing something.
>

This should be similar to other calls

	struct rsi_host_call *rhicall __free(kfree) =
		kmalloc(sizeof(struct rsi_host_call), GFP_KERNEL);

I’ll update the code to reflect that. Thanks for pointing it out.

>
>> +	if (!rhicall)
>> +		return -ENOMEM;
>> +
>> +	rhicall->imm = 0;
>> +	rhicall->gprs[0] = RHI_DA_FEATURES;
>> +
>> +	ret = rsi_host_call(virt_to_phys(rhicall));
>> +	if (ret != RSI_SUCCESS || rhicall->gprs[0] == SMCCC_RET_NOT_SUPPORTED)
>> +		return false;
>> +
>> +	/* For base DA to work we need these to be supported */
>> +	if ((rhicall->gprs[0] & RHI_DA_BASE_FEATURE) == RHI_DA_BASE_FEATURE)
>> +		return true;
>> +
>> +	return false;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static inline int rhi_vdev_continue(unsigned long vdev_id, unsigned long cookie)
>> +{
>> +	unsigned long ret;
>> +
>> +	struct rsi_host_call *rhi_call __free(kfree) =
>> +		kmalloc(sizeof(struct rsi_host_call), GFP_KERNEL);
>
> sizeof(*rhi_call)  Same for all other cases of this.
>
>> +	if (!rhi_call)
>> +		return -ENOMEM;
>> +
>> +	rhi_call->imm = 0;
>> +	rhi_call->gprs[0] = RHI_DA_VDEV_CONTINUE;
>> +	rhi_call->gprs[1] = vdev_id;
>> +	rhi_call->gprs[2] = cookie;
>> +
>> +	ret = rsi_host_call(virt_to_phys(rhi_call));
>> +	if (ret != RSI_SUCCESS)
>> +		return -EIO;
>> +
>> +	return map_rhi_da_error(rhi_call->gprs[0]);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int __rhi_vdev_abort(unsigned long vdev_id, unsigned long *da_error)
>> +{
>> +	unsigned long ret;
>> +	struct rsi_host_call *rhi_call __free(kfree) =
>> +		kmalloc(sizeof(struct rsi_host_call), GFP_KERNEL);
>
> sizeof(*rhi_call) probably preferred.
>
>> +	if (!rhi_call)
>> +		return -ENOMEM;
>> +
>> +	rhi_call->imm = 0;
>> +	rhi_call->gprs[0] = RHI_DA_VDEV_ABORT;
>> +	rhi_call->gprs[1] = vdev_id;
>> +
>> +	ret = rsi_host_call(virt_to_phys(rhi_call));
>> +	if (ret != RSI_SUCCESS)
>> +		return -EIO;
>> +
>> +	return *da_error = rhi_call->gprs[0];
>> +	return 0;
>
> ?  Run builds after each patch and you may catch stuff like this.
>
>> +}
>> +
>> +static bool should_abort_rhi_call_loop(unsigned long vdev_id)
>> +{
>> +	int ret;
>> +
>> +	cond_resched();
>> +	if (signal_pending(current)) {
>> +		unsigned long da_error;
>> +
>> +		ret = __rhi_vdev_abort(vdev_id, &da_error);
>> +		/* consider all kind of error as not aborted */
>> +		if (!ret && (da_error == RHI_DA_SUCCESS))
>> +			return true;
>> +	}
>> +	return false;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int __rhi_vdev_set_tdi_state(unsigned long vdev_id,
>> +				    unsigned long target_state,
>
> Maybe use an enum for target state? Can name it to align with the
> RHIDAVDevTDIState used as the type for this in the RHI spec.
>

how about enum rhi_tdi_state ?

>
>
>> +				    unsigned long *cookie)
>> +{
>> +	unsigned long ret;
>> +
>> +	struct rsi_host_call *rhi_call __free(kfree) =
>> +		kmalloc(sizeof(struct rsi_host_call), GFP_KERNEL);
>> +	if (!rhi_call)
>> +		return -ENOMEM;
>> +
>> +	rhi_call->imm = 0;
>> +	rhi_call->gprs[0] = RHI_DA_VDEV_SET_TDI_STATE;
>> +	rhi_call->gprs[1] = vdev_id;
>> +	rhi_call->gprs[2] = target_state;
>> +
>> +	ret = rsi_host_call(virt_to_phys(rhi_call));
>> +	if (ret != RSI_SUCCESS)
>> +		return -EIO;
>> +
>> +	*cookie = rhi_call->gprs[1];
>> +	return map_rhi_da_error(rhi_call->gprs[0]);
>> +}
>
>> diff --git a/drivers/virt/coco/arm-cca-guest/rhi-da.h b/drivers/virt/coco/arm-cca-guest/rhi-da.h
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 000000000000..8dd77c7ed645
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/drivers/virt/coco/arm-cca-guest/rhi-da.h
>> @@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
>> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only */
>> +/*
>> + * Copyright (C) 2024 ARM Ltd.
>
> Possibly update if this has changed much this year.
>
>> + */
>> +
>> +#ifndef _VIRT_COCO_RHI_DA_H_
>> +#define _VIRT_COCO_RHI_DA_H_
>> +
>> +#include <asm/rhi.h>
>> +
>> +struct pci_dev;
>> +bool rhi_has_da_support(void);
>> +int rhi_vdev_set_tdi_state(struct pci_dev *pdev, unsigned long target_state);
>> +#endif

-aneesh

  reply	other threads:[~2025-11-24  5:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-11-17 13:59 [PATCH v2 00/11] TSM: Implement ->lock()/->accept() callbacks for ARM CCA TDISP setup Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2025-11-17 13:59 ` [PATCH v2 01/11] coco: guest: arm64: Guest TSM callback and realm device lock support Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2025-11-19 15:22   ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-11-24  4:40     ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2025-11-17 13:59 ` [PATCH v2 02/11] coco: guest: arm64: Add Realm Host Interface and guest DA helper Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2025-11-19 15:32   ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-11-24  5:07     ` Aneesh Kumar K.V [this message]
2025-11-17 13:59 ` [PATCH v2 03/11] coco: guest: arm64: Add support for guest initiated TDI bind/unbind Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2025-11-19 15:50   ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-11-17 14:00 ` [PATCH v2 04/11] coco: guest: arm64: Add support for updating interface reports from device Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2025-11-19 15:54   ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-11-24  5:42     ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2025-11-17 14:00 ` [PATCH v2 05/11] coco: guest: arm64: Add support for updating measurements " Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2025-11-20 15:22   ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-11-24  6:18     ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2025-11-17 14:00 ` [PATCH v2 06/11] coco: guest: arm64: Add support for reading cached objects from host Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2025-11-20 17:31   ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-11-24  6:52     ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2025-11-17 14:00 ` [PATCH v2 07/11] coco: guest: arm64: Validate Realm MMIO mappings from TDISP report Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2025-11-20 17:43   ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-11-17 14:00 ` [PATCH v2 08/11] coco: guest: arm64: Add support for fetching and verifying device info Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2025-11-20 17:54   ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-11-24  8:28     ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2025-11-17 14:00 ` [PATCH v2 09/11] coco: guest: arm64: Wire Realm TDISP RUN/STOP transitions into guest driver Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2025-11-20 17:55   ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-11-17 14:00 ` [PATCH v2 10/11] coco: arm64: dma: Update force_dma_unencrypted for accepted devices Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2025-11-20 17:58   ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-11-17 14:00 ` [PATCH v2 11/11] coco: guest: arm64: Enable vdev DMA after attestation Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2025-11-20 17:59   ` Jonathan Cameron

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=yq5aa50cm326.fsf@kernel.org \
    --to=aneesh.kumar@kernel.org \
    --cc=Suzuki.Poulose@arm.com \
    --cc=aik@amd.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
    --cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
    --cc=jonathan.cameron@huawei.com \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-coco@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lukas@wunner.de \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
    --cc=sameo@rivosinc.com \
    --cc=steven.price@arm.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=yilun.xu@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).